By Kelly Dearmore
By Jim Schutze
By Rachel Watts
By Lauren Drewes Daniels
By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
By Alice Laussade
In the late '60s--before the Grateful Dead had ever recorded a note, just as Jefferson Airplane landed its deal with RCA Records--Richard Goldstein wrote in The Village Voice that the music emanating from San Francisco was "the most potentially vital in the pop world." The Bay Area bands, he insisted, were creating a sound born of "spontaneity," standing in direct opposition to those musicians more concerned with "form and influence...[not] effort."
To Goldstein and the dozens of other writers who flocked to San Francisco 25 years ago, that town beckoned in the distance like the undiscovered country--virgin territory ripe for discovery, untainted by the grubby hands of the music industry that would eventually come to the Bay Area and wine and dine local talent "like the last available shikse in the promised land," Goldstein noticed.
But Goldstein also cautioned in his piece, titled "San Francisco Bray," that once those bands were discovered, they would fall prey to greed and ruin, finally wilting under the media spotlight that accompanies the discovery of any new fad or trend.
"The most fragile thing to maintain in our culture is an underground," Goldstein wrote. "No sooner is a low-rent, low-harassment quarter discovered than it appears in color spreads on America's breakfast table...The new bohemians needn't worry about opposition these days; just exploitation."
It's curious, more than two decades after this piece was written, to apply these words (of caution, of promise) to our own "scene," if that's indeed the word for what you'd call a few hundred bands trying to get booked into a few dozen clubs so a few people might see them on a Wednesday night. (And one can't help but chuckle at the thick irony found in the phrase the new bohemians needn't worry about opposition because when Goldstein wrote his piece, Edie Brickell and Kenny Withrow were still into Captain Kangaroo, not Captain Trips.)
If one were to follow Goldstein's definition of what makes a scene most--interesting, vital music created by several handfuls of artists in love with their craft--then, indeed, Dallas approaches the ideal: there are dozens of unsigned artists--Cafe Noir, Sixty-Six, Funland, Baboon, Slowpoke, Cowboys and Indians, Tommy Morrell, Spyche, Little Jack Melody and His Young Turks, Marchel Ivery, Bedhead, Ethyl Merman, and so many others who fill clubs most nights--creating challenging, interesting, noteworthy, occasionally brilliant sounds that transcend the baggage attached to the label "local band." To walk into a club and hear Bill Longhorse growl his way through "Swell Hell" or experience the mournful beauty of Gale Hess' violin playing or the swingin' stomp of Erik Swanson is to believe all the music you will ever need can be found inside the city limits.
And yet, a scene isn't defined just by the mere existence of bands and clubs; it isn't something so easily manufactured. Deep Ellum and Lower Greenville and even Exposition Park are more restaurant scenes than music scenes, anyway, with clubs outnumbered by trendy eateries and furniture stores and upscale bars. Rather, a scene is defined and sustained by the passion and knowledge of those who would choose to be a part of it--passion and knowledge not only about one or two bands, but about the entirety of music.
There is really no Dallas music scene; if one existed in the mid to late '80s, it has long disappeared, the victim of greedheads and trendhoppers and fadseekers who came into Deep Ellum looking to claim every square inch as their own. No, this column is not another lament for the so-called Good Ol' Days (that really existed only in memory). Rather, it's part of a search for the passion--the dialogue between band and audience, the feeling that musicians are in this for the joy of performing instead of amassing crowds who pay no attention to the music--that seems to be lacking in this town.
Consider why, with all the bands that have been signed to major labels in recent years (from Reverend Horton Heat to the Toadies to Jackopierce to Tripping Daisy), there has been no talk among the national magazines of a "Dallas scene." In its recent year-long quest for the great American rock and roll town (titled: "A Year in the Life of Rock and Roll"), Spin ignored Dallas completely, going instead to places like New Orleans, Chicago, and, of all places, Columbia, Missouri. Even better, Alternative Press recently referred to Bedhead as an "Austin band."
Why? Because Dallas has no identity as a music city. It's become just another stop on the map where musicians ply their trades in hopes of giving up their day jobs. Bands have tasted the promise of success, watched as peers and contemporaries from Pantera to the New Bos to Brutal Juice landed major-label deals, and now bide their time till they are discovered. But remember, every band's a local band somewhere, and a few just happen to be from Dallas.
Crushing masses of people do not head to Deep Ellum on Tuesdays or Wednesdays unless some touring act is playing Trees or the Galaxy Club or Deep Ellum Live. The crowds do come on weekends and line up to get into the Art Bar or the Bone, heading to the clubs when Reverend Horton Heat or Course of Empire or the Toadies are in town--but only because these local bands have been given the stamp of approval from executives in Los Angeles or New York. The Toadies didn't even draw large crowds in Dallas until the eve of the release of their major-label debut Rubberneck, and, even then, the show was free.