By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
By Alice Laussade
By Scott Reitz
By Claire Lawton
By Kiernan Maletsky
By Anna Merlan
Disney, an information-age company through and through, understands this principle with frightening clarity. Let's think about how this will affect the news--and how the increasing concentration of media ownership affects the news in general.
A few years ago, a day-care center innocuously painted images of Disney cartoon characters on its windows. Disney's swift retaliation--including freakishly excessive legal threats that would sound more appropriate spewing from the mouth of an anti-Mafiosi district attorney--was given big play on TV newscasts and in newspapers nationwide. Coverage of the incident was as informative as it was appal-lingly funny; it illustrated to shareholders and average citizens why many Disney employees refer to the company's management style as "Mouse-schwitz." More recently, we've seen stories about teenagers who died mimicking a stunt they saw in the Disney film The Program; about the company's push--aborted following public protests--to build a Disneyfied history park in Virginia; and about the near-hysterical hatred many French citizens feel toward the culture-despoiling EuroDisney.
The next time a Disney public-relations disaster happens, do you think you'll read an aggressive, provocative story about it in The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, which is owned by Cap Cities--even a wire story? Do you think you'll see a fair story about it on the ABC Evening News, or the nightly newscast on WFAA-Channel 8, an ABC affiliate? Do you really believe the normally skeptical Dallas Morning News TV critic Ed Bark when he parrots the official company line--that Disney's self-interested agenda and brutal reputation won't intimidate anybody working in any division of the media company it just swallowed up?
Anybody who does believe it probably thought The Lion King was a documentary.
--Matt Zoller Seitz (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!