Most Popular
Reader's PicksTop RecommendationsA short list of Dallas's most popular hot spots.
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
Hash OverBy Mark StuertzPublished on November 19, 1998Butt ban? But they offered no hard data to substantiate these claims, prompting prickly quips from the commission. "How often does a patron enter a restaurant and ask to be seated in a no-smoking section and is told there is no seating available in no-smoking?" asked commission member Richard Wasserman. "If there's no data tracking that, then I think it's disingenuous to suggest that there isn't a problem." What's more disingenuous, however, is the kid-glove treatment commission members applied to the Dallas Fresh Air Coalition, an ad-hoc organization of health and community-interest groups that seeks to dramatically tighten the city's smoking ordinance in the name of public health. Armed with reams of evidentiary paper bolstering their contention that secondhand smoke is a serious public health risk that "voters" want regulated, the group offered a 1993 Environmental Protection Agency report designating airborne smoke a "class A carcinogen" as the linchpin to their argument. This report is the justification for public-place smoking bans nationwide. Yet in July, a federal judge struck down the EPA's findings, essentially saying the agency reached a desired conclusion before research began, and then doctored established procedures to make sure the evidence conformed to that conclusion--that is, secondhand smoke causes cancer. A recent seven-year, seven-country World Health Organization study also found no statistically significant health risks associated with secondhand smoke. But such findings, while pointed out to the commission, drew no scrutiny for Fresh Air, which shows you how aerodynamically sound junk science is in the world of lawmaking. List watch --Mark Stuertz E-mail Dish at markstz@juno.com.
write your comment
|