By Jim Schutze
By Rachel Watts
By Lauren Drewes Daniels
By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
By Eric Nicholson
About the closest most of us will ever come to the backwoods of Appalachia is watching Deliverance, and the harrowing misadventure upon which its plot hinges pretty much ensures that we won't want to visit the backwoods of Appalachia. That the entire region and its natives have been defined for generations by a single brutal film adaptation of a James Dickey novel is odd enough; that the area's isolated inhabitants happen to be our countrymen--bands of them inhabiting the mountains of Tennessee, Kentucky, and North Carolina--and we know nothing about them is extraordinary. We're more likely to look to third-world countries for signs of gross poverty or archaic society than we are to search our own back yard. We civilians don't have much hard information about the nether regions of Appalachia because we don't go up to those remote "hollers" in the hills. At some level, we must know we're not welcome. To most of us urbanites, Appalachia's impression was sealed in celluloid in 1972, when a big ol' mountain bully forced a terrified Ned Beatty to--uh--squeal like a pig.
So instead of trespassing on Appalachia's breathtakingly lush landscape and meeting its unusual people, we vacation elsewhere (that's how we know, contrary to other movie myths, that Chicago isn't populated solely by mafiosi and Scotland by junkies). Lucky for us, Shelby Lee Adams does hang out in Appalachian hollers, and more importantly, with the people there, and he graciously documents his yearly pilgrimages with heart-stopping photographs of it all.
Part black-and-white documentation, part haunting artistic vision, Adams' photos go beyond the call of duty on either end; his deep-focus environments, unflinching portraits, dream-like lighting, and ongoing images of families and individuals act as a combination punch: National Geographic meets Diane Arbus, On the Road with David Lynch instead of Charles Kuralt.
This Friday, 30 of these images go on display at Photographs Do Not Bend Gallery in Dallas, though most viewers will likely forget they're even looking at stunningly composed photographs. They're too busy marveling at what they reveal: a legacy of rural tradition anchored in welfare, alcohol, coal mining, religion, and questionably extended families. What happens to a house when it becomes as much a storage room-barn-shrine as it does a home. The hardened souls behind the eyes of those who've lived "up against it," as Adams writes in his stunning book, Appalachian Legacy, referring to uninterrupted generations of poverty, low expectations, and a dismissive attitude from the outside--the kind of forces that create communal ties that not only bind people, but are crucial to their very survival. We are outside looking in, and though we try, we can't quite grasp what separates these people from the rest of us. We can't fathom that it's because we own computers and fast cars and work in office buildings, and they handle snakes in church and slaughter hogs and use outhouses. Sure, theirs is an evaporating culture in a fast-homogenizing world, but you can see in those eyes, those knowing, challenging gazes, that their mixed fate is rooted far deeper than the material, far past their lack of college education and paltry paychecks. That Adams' photos can hint at the complexity of this buried mountain culture without exploiting its people is the second part of his art. Because what his photos don't reveal is shame, and in preserving his subjects' pride, Adams makes us guess about what drives them, which in turn makes us think.
Hard-edged prejudice--something Appalachian mountain people have lived with for at least half this century, since the coal mines were shut down, welfare kicked in, and their more restless inhabitants moved into the cities--is a difficult force for a lone art photographer to debunk. That Adams, armed with his double masters' degree in fine art, snaps these people in their actual environment, wearing their own clothes, expressions, and body language, has some critics cautioning that Adams is merely cashing in on the stereotype. Why would Adams photograph a dough-faced man possessively grasping his skinny, slouchy teenage bride, flanked by two sadly disfigured tiny relatives, all lighted garishly on a dilapidated porch, if he wants to capture the natural nobility and grace of these people? To dispel popular myth? Regardless of the honesty of the photo, it makes most viewers shudder a bit while conjuring its inherent implications (spousal abuse? has she even hit puberty yet? are those deformed ones related in some not quite legal way?). But look closer. There's no disrespect in the camera's approach, no judgment coming from Adams himself. Our knee-jerk response is to misunderstand, to criticize. Yet there they are, unapologetic and steady. Again, their eyes tell the half-story: "We do exist. Get used to it."
Indeed, they have names (the man described above is Roy Childers) and stories, and Adams can tell them all. In his book, he explains the context of the photos with clear, graceful language, letting readers in on the backgrounds of his subjects and his own growing attachment to them. Of the Napier family, one of his longtime subjects, he writes, "Most of the deceased children had died violently; one son was shot and killed by his father, a daughter was poisoned by relatives, and other sons died from shootings, including one killed by his brother." Still, his time with them has sparked some mutual affection: "James Napier and I have become particularly close. He loves being photographed, has no inhibitions about it, presenting himself to the camera with daring honesty...He is by nature quite harmless, and when not drinking is a gentle soul."