By Jim Schutze
By Rachel Watts
By Lauren Drewes Daniels
By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
And that is not to say that nice things can't happen in trailer parks. Mike Moses, our next schools superintendent, comes to the job with great credentials, compared with his predecessors. He has never once been in the pen. When he was Texas commissioner of education, he never arranged bizarrely staged press events in which he reminded us of Slobodan Milosevic in a whimsical mood.
Of the people who've worked with Moses, the sane ones speak well of him and the crazy ones don't. This may be a new experience for us.
But there is a downside. He has never been administrator of anything anywhere near the size of the Dallas Independent School District. He is of the national fraternity of professional public school administrators, which always raises the question of how vigorously he will go after dead wood at 3700 Ross Avenue.
And even more troubling, the "search process" which brought him here was a mirror of the search that brought us his immediate predecessor, Slobodan Rojas.
Once again, this is no church wedding.
The most consistent coda, the part that never seems to change, is the role played by the chamber of commerce and the Dallas Citizens Council--the private, semi-secret business group downtown that thinks it still runs things. How do I describe their part, in courtship terms? It's kind of like, "Hi, I'm her dad; I have a gun; I'm boozed up; and I don't like your face."
Other than that, you kids enjoy the movie.
This time, as before, everything turned on the question of why they couldn't marry the smart one from the good background. That would be Dallas County Judge Lee Jackson. They left him at the altar the last time, too, when the board hired Rojas. He's been jilted twice.
It's becoming a joke.
The first time around, Jackson got the shove after emissaries for the Citizens Council called all the board members and told them that they had to vote for him. You just don't do that. It plays into the hands of the very people who don't want anybody good in there.
This time, the Citizens Council and the chamber of commerce shot off their cannons and warned the school board it had better get in shape. Good! Somebody needed to say that. Then they went on to say that some of their muckety-muck members might even run for the school board. Great! Almost everybody agrees we need more people running for the school board.
But of all the sitting board members, who was the first one they picked to eject? Ken Zornes.
No, no, no, fellas! Zornes is on your side! Was on your side, anyway. How complicated is this? It's like what I had to tell my kid's soccer team after a few bad mistakes in their first game as 4-year-olds: Goals are only a good thing if you kick them against the other team.
Ken Zornes, who represents District 1 in far North nose-bleed Dallas, up above LBJ Expressway, was a Jackson supporter...until the word went out that Jack Lowe Jr., head of TD Industries, might run against him.
So guess what happened when Lee Jackson's name came up for a vote of the board? Zornes voted against him.
I'm not saying that was the only reason or the main reason. Zornes, who has been very punctilious about the privacy of the search process, would not discuss this issue with me. And Jack Lowe Jr. told me he had not yet made any decision about his running against Zornes. Lowe said he thinks well of Zornes.
Lowe's problem is that he doesn't live in the districts of any of the people he thinks are bad board members. And he doesn't want to move to a downscale neighborhood. So he's thinking about running against his own ally.
He said, "There are a couple of other board members I wouldn't mind replacing, but I don't happen to live in their districts."
Yeah, fine, but see: That's how this stuff happens. The word got out that Lowe might run. He didn't quash it, and he's not saying he won't run. So the one guy on the school board who has to worry most about a Big Dog coming in with big bucks to shove him off the table is the guy who was most decidedly on the big dogs' side.
Not good politics. One field, two goals, opposite ends. Let's all work on this with our moms and dads when we go home tonight.
Whether it was ever really true or not, several board members were convinced there was tough business-community pressure on them to vote for Jackson. Some of them say threats were made, not merely that they would have opponents in the next election if Jackson didn't get the nod, but that spouses might lose their jobs and stuff like that. Fair or not, it sounds as though that perception had a very unfortunate effect on how the board saw Jackson personally in his interviews.