Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

For Art's Stake

European Masters and Dallas benefactors

Share

  • rss

By Shannon Sutlief

Published on January 10, 2002

The Dallas Museum of Art's new exhibit, European Masterworks, The Foundation for the Arts Collection at the Dallas Museum of Art, contains more than 100 works produced between 1700 and 1950 by Europe's great masters.

These paintings, sculptures and works on paper by artists such as Picasso, Matisse, Renoir, Rodin and Toulouse-Lautrec have been pulled from the museum's vaults and permanent galleries, dusted off and reinstalled in the large, downstairs J.E.R. Chilton galleries in the order in which they were produced.

There are new placards connecting the themes, styles and relationships of the work and adding context to the brushstrokes, line drawings and dried clay.

All in all, it's the kind of history-based exhibit for which those who love viewing great (and famous) art usually give a museum a pat on the back. Too bad the museum started giving itself the high fives and backslapping before the show even opened.

The exhibit, as the part of the title following the comma suggests, is a self-congratulatory display to kick off a two-year celebration of the museum's 100-year anniversary in 2003. It shows the kind of art that benefactors' money can buy when it's thrown at a foundation with a thirst for big names.

Along with honoring the included artists and their work, European Masters pays equal tribute to the foundation and the people behind the money. But the aesthetic value of the art could speak for itself. And it should.