By Lauren Smart
By Jane R. LeBlanc
By Lauren Smart
By Elaine Liner
By Jim Schutze
By Rachel Watts
What makes the paintings now showing in Robert Ryman at the Dallas Museum of Art so striking is the artist's game of decision. Paint is his medium and choice his tool. One imagines Ryman deciding when to emphasize the painting's construction behind rather than the skin on top or both at once; him choosing just the right type of mount on the wall, whether it will be the gooey viscosity of paint on the edges that adheres a surface directly onto the wall or an Ikea-inspired wooden apparatus that literally raises the surface structure several inches off of the wall.
In short, Ryman is a master at deploying opposing forces. At the core of his work is the play of structure and surface. In the "Classico" series, Ryman makes flat surfaces in the form of grids that hover just along the wall. The sliver of space between each row of sheets creates a series of open vertical and horizontal seams that delineate a blanched matrix. In "Classico IV" (1968), Ryman has arranged in three rows 12 individual pieces of handmade Classico paper on a thin layer of foamcore. Atop this grid, Ryman painted a slightly drippy white square not quite at the center. "Classico 6" (1968), six sheets of watermarked cotton paper also mounted on foamcore, is a white surface that similarly floats just out from the wall. "Regis" (1977) and "Channel" (1982) sit even closer to the wall of the gallery. Ryman mounted the otherwise sheer white square of "Regis" with four tiny black oxide steel fasteners. And "Channel" is a thin sheet of Enamelac, a waxy opalescent layer of paint, on linen and aluminum that similarly lies almost flush with the wall. With "Philadelphia Prototype" (2002), Ryman uses paint as the sticky substance to literally glue flat squares to the wall. Paint operates as both surface sheath and functional adhesive: It is simultaneously façade and façade-maker. A row of white vinyl sheets adheres to the wall by way of strokes of white acrylic paint that Ryman applied along the edges of each square. Ryman has coupled deft craftsmanship with the irony of conceptualism as these carefully stuck surfaces will likely be destroyed when unstuck. And nothing will remain.
Then there is the dialectic of white pigment. The whiteness of his ghostlike surfaces connotes nothing and everything at once. Ryman's penchant for white earmarks a quest for maximum neutrality, erasure, emptiness or, as the art critic Yve-Alain Bois has it, the entombment of modernist painting. Undoubtedly white is what gives body to the profound dispensation of barrenness in Ryman's paintings. At the same time, and scientifically speaking, white is the combination of all colors, since it reflects all wavelengths of visible light. While the whiteness of "Van" (1993) is glistening and silvery, that of "Series #9 (White)" (2004) leans more toward icy blue. Both paintings are exercises in steely cold formalism. By contrast, "Back Talk" (1964) seems to move according to the warm rhythmic variation of painted globs. It is a series of five small linen canvases wherein squiggles of thick white give way to a few curving chunks of blue and orange paint.
Far from nothing, the color white becomes everything in Ryman's paintings--impastoed splotches à la Van Gogh as an homage to the life of the hallowed medium itself and the logo-like "98" (referring to the year he painted it) on a linen sidebar as a wink to painting's cyclical demise. Ryman walks a fine line between avant-garde and kitsch. His work is ambiguous: It is sometimes fine art and sometimes willfully low. With searing attention to flatness and the application of paint, certain paintings materialize the now-classical principles of Greenbergian high-art modernism. In "Document" (2002), for example, Ryman has applied oil to canvas in small craggy gestures as if to tell us of his heroic presence. He left the edges of the canvas wheat-colored and barren reminding us of painting's essential properties: liquid color and a flat surface. At the same time, though, certain paintings smack of Warholian Pop. His name painted at the bottom center of an untitled canvas from 1962 seems more a sarcastic act of Coca-Cola commodification than a mark of authenticity.