Backing Rebecca Aguilar

Buzz just sees a reporter doing her job

Inquiring minds: Buzz keeps watching the video of reporter Rebecca Aguilar's interview with James Walton, the West Dallas business owner who, in separate incidents in about the past four weeks, shot and killed two burglars breaking into his machine shop. We watch and watch and still don't get it: Why did KDFW-Channel 4 suspend Aguilar?

You may have missed the report—Channel 4 pulled it from the station's Web site and demanded YouTube remove its copy. You can still find it on the Web if you search, along with about 8 kazillion blog posts vilifying Aguilar, slamming her with ethnic slurs, suggesting that she be shot or calling her a bad word that rhymes with runt.

You know, the usual blog stuff.

Aguilar met Walton outside a sporting goods store, where he was buying a shotgun. (The cops took two other guns from him as evidence while the shootings undergo a pro forma review by a grand jury.) Walton had told her where he'd be, so she didn't ambush him, as some bloggers suggested. He didn't want his face to appear on camera, but Aguilar peppered him with questions anyway, as was, Buzz thought, her job.

Not that we don't feel bad for Walton. He didn't thrust himself before the media. Still, you kill a couple of guys inside a month, you get reporters in your face. Welcome to civilization. But ask yourself this: If a cop killed two suspects in such a short period, wouldn't you want some watchdog sniffing around to make sure we didn't have a trigger-happy lawman on the street? You would if you know what's good for you. And cops are trained. Walton is just a gifted amateur. It behooves us to know whether he might be a little loose with his lead.

That's what Aguilar wanted to know: "Are you a trigger-happy kind of person? Is that what you wanted to do, shoot to kill?" she asked.

Granted those questions are not what you might call tactful, but they're the heart of the story. And if you watch the video, it will seem obvious Aguilar was trying hard to elicit Walton's side. (She does.) That's one trick reporters have: Be shockingly direct, rude even, and see what you get. Reporting can be an ugly business sometimes, which is why you hate us. You still need us, though.

Of course, Aguilar could have been slick and edited out her questions, broadcasting only his responses. Maybe she's too honest. (She's told us she couldn't talk about her suspension. We couldn't reach Walton.) Or maybe she needs backing from an editor, though apparently Channel 4 doesn't have any of those, since we haven't heard of any of Aguilar's supervisors getting suspended.

 
  • Monique Sharps 07/13/2009 10:14:00 PM

    I just bumped into the article about Rebecca Aguilar. She should have been fired along time ago. She did a story on a organization New Beginnings Christian Academy about bogus diplomas-I was there when she interviewed the director and she twisted and aired nothing but lies about the school. The organization has been helping young people like myself get off the streets and get a better education and a better job. The Lord likes truth and honesty and she did not air the truth about that academy whatsoever!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • drew 10/26/2007 7:49:00 PM

    Ms. Agiular is lucky she wasn't shot by the car. One could legally argue that the space between the open car door and the car is his domain. Since he was able to use the castle doctrine to kill the other, why not just make it 3 for 3 on people invading his space? I'm not say she should be shot or anything like that, and i think reporters have a right to free speech. But the work she did on this story was just plain bad. If anything she should be suspended for just poor journalism. By making the reporter seem like a victim you are in turn making the burglars look like victims. People that think that you shouldn't face those potential consequences for committing crime are crazy.

  • Bob S. 10/26/2007 4:41:00 PM

    There is a huge difference in tact and attacking. Rebecca repeatedly phrased questions to make Mr. Walton look like a "trigger happy" villain. Did she mention in the story that he had called the police 42 times in the past 12 months? Did she mention that the salvage yard is also his HOME? What would your response be if your home was broken into repeatedly? Mr. Walton stated at the beginning he didn't want his face seen, but yet to make the story Fox 4 and Aguilar showed his face at the beginning of the interview, how is that for journalistic integrity? "It behooves us to know whether he might be a little loose with his lead." You've got to be kidding, it that was the case, why weren't there more shooting at his place? The right of the news to make a story shouldn't come at the expense of detaining a person, disobeying his wishes to protect his privacy, at his right to defend himself. Aguilar seems to have realized that she had gone too far and tried to cover with the bit about getting his side out. If she was truly interested in his side, her questions would have reflected that. Did she ask about how terrified he was, how close the burglars were to him, what security measures they by-passed to get into his property? NO. She attacked him and tried to portray him as being "trigger happy". The response needs to be a firing of Aguilar and the others involved in this story.

  • wick olson 10/26/2007 6:03:00 AM

    Why doesn't the Dallas Observer hire Ms. Aquirre? It would be an improvement over the the other Old Gray Mare.

  • The Coop 10/25/2007 11:27:00 PM

    Where to begin? 1) If you saw the video, you would clearly see that she was standing in his open car door in a way that he could not close it and drive away. 2) You failed to mention that Mr. Walton told her he didn't have time for her, and then she shows up anyway. He didn't tell her where he would be as-if to meet up with her. 3) The analogy that you gave of a cop is terrible. Police patrol the streets, looking for criminals. In Mr. Waltons case, the criminals BROKE INTO HIS HOME (also his place of business). A more appropriate analogy would be if a cop had two burglars break into his house on separate occasions, and he shot them. 4) Isn't her job to report the news? It seems to me like she formed an opinion (please see the "trigger happy" comment). What she was doing just looked like sensational journalism designed to get ratings. 5) Google some of the key words from this story, and read everything for yourself. Then decide is she was out of line...I bet you will agree.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy