American Toxic

The railroad tie plant that gave birth to tiny Somerville may now be killing the town, residents claim

Dennis Davis thought maybe his family was cursed.

In early 1998, his uncle Don developed an aggressive skin cancer that devoured his face. Several months later, his brother Dale died suddenly at age 46 from stomach cancer. A few weeks after that, his granddaughter Makayla was born with severe birth defects.

Veteran tie-plant employee Don "Slim" Hightower developed an aggressive skin cancer that devoured his face and killed him.
Courtesy of Jared Woodfill
Veteran tie-plant employee Don "Slim" Hightower developed an aggressive skin cancer that devoured his face and killed him.
Somerville native Dennis Davis was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in November 2006.
Daniel Kramer
Somerville native Dennis Davis was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in November 2006.

Davis started thinking about the other families in his small town that he knew had serious illnesses—the cancers, the brain tumors, the babies born with cleft palates.

He went from house to house in his neighborhood and was stunned to find that nearly every family he visited was privately dealing with some type of horrendous disease.

"There's a catastrophe in our community," says Davis, who in November 2006 at age 53 was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. "God knows what we're contaminated with."

Somerville, Texas, a sleepy, one-stoplight town 90 miles northwest of Houston, is home to a massive wood-treatment facility, which for more than 100 years churned toxic chemicals into the atmosphere while manufacturing phone poles and bridge supports. Locals call it the "tie plant" since in its earlier days it was the nation's largest producer of railroad cross-ties.

It was also among the industry's worst polluters, according to several prominent environmental scientists who say Somerville residents for decades were exposed to wildly elevated levels of arsenic, dioxins and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons—all known cancer-causing chemicals considered highly toxic even at low doses.

Dust samples taken during the last year from several Somerville homes and school buildings reveal contamination levels higher even than those found 30 years ago in Love Canal, the notorious chemical landfill in Niagara Falls linked to high rates of cancers and birth defects, according to James Dahlgren, a clinical assistant professor of medicine at UCLA School of Medicine who has been retained by plaintiffs' attorneys in several pending lawsuits against the plant.

"The situation in Somerville is a public-health emergency," Dahlgren says. "The government should be called in to investigate."

An investigation by the Dallas Observer's sister paper, the Houston Press, found:

• Though incidences of stomach cancer across the country have plummeted during the last several decades, now representing just 2 percent of all new cancer cases, Somerville residents are contracting the disease at a rate as much as 40 to 60 times the national average, according to Dahlgren.

• Though industry standards have existed for decades regarding industrial waste management, the tie plant as recently as the mid-1990s neglected to install any air pollution controls on smokestacks, routinely flushed chemical waste into local creeks and improperly used wood-waste boilers as incinerators, causing an incomplete combustion that increased the toxicity of chemicals released into the air.

• Though the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has never conducted any off-site testing to determine possible contamination levels for Somerville residents, agency spokesman Terry Clawson claims, "We are confident that the bulk of the contamination is on-site [of the plant itself] and is being remediated."

Davis and more than 200 other Somerville residents have sued current tie plant owner Koppers Inc., a Pittsburgh-based chemical manufacturer, and longtime previous owner Fort Worth-based BNSF Railway (formerly the Chicago-based Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway), alleging the facility's operations have caused an array of serious health problems.

In October, Houston law firm Woodfill & Pressler LLP filed a class-action complaint against Koppers, demanding the company provide all Somerville residents free medical screenings for early cancer detection. The complaint promises that ongoing studies will show Somerville as having "the largest cancer cluster and other malignant disorders ever seen."

The tie plant continues to use various heavy-duty pesticides and wood preservatives, including coal-tar creosote, a tarry, chemical stew which today is banned in more than two dozen countries and classified as a known human carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Dahlgren says the various carcinogens spewed from the facility created a "synergistic effect," increasing their toxicity. As a result, the cancers reported in Somerville are not just occurring in younger people—they are also hyper-aggressive, killing them quickly.

Residents have long suspected that Somerville has a greater incidence of cancer and other severe illnesses than would be expected for a town with just 1,700 people. In the mid-1970s, the Texas Department of Health Services found that mortality rates from gastrointestinal cancers were twice as high in Burleson County compared with the rest of the state, as documented in a report titled "Creosote Blues" published 27 years ago in The Texas Observer.

"It's just assumed here that cancer is what kills you," says Somerville native Edward "E.W." Schoenberg, a plaintiff in the lawsuits who was diagnosed last year with bladder cancer.

Ronald Supak, a tie plant worker for 28 years whose son was born with a cleft palate, says: "My friends are all dying from cancer; I'm waiting for my turn."

The Press spent six weeks interviewing more than three dozen Somerville residents and reviewing tens of thousands of pages of railway company documents, environmental reports and medical records, as well as depositions, affidavits, sworn statements and other court documents collected from legal discovery and federal and state open-records requests with the TCEQ and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next Page >>
 
  • Karen 01/02/2008 6:05:00 PM

    I would prefer to not be blasted for this but I'm sure I'll receive my fair share of people yelling at me through the internet. First a small bit to the mayor of Somerville. If you are going to write something in a public forum it is generally a good idea to have someone proof read to eliminate errors such as spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Especially if you are a public official. That being said for those in the town and those involved in the law suit. You need to remember that you are a community. Don't squabble like a group of children and cut someone else from your life because they are being cautious or stating what they believe to be true. If the plant was dumping waste water that contained chemicals into the dry riverbeds when it rained then all water and land along those riverbeds could be contaminated. Notice the ifs and coulds please. But it does stand to reason that if they did that and the water soaked into the earth then it could have been absorbed quite easily by plants in a vegtable garden, especially if the ground has had almost a century to accumulate the poisons. Then eating these vegtables on a three meal a day every day of the week, month, and year could cause a reaction of cancer or birth defects. Honestly if I lived in this town I would be less concerned about my property value and more concerned for not only my children's present health but that of their future health and lives. You can always move somewhere else and find that same hometown feeling but you can never help a child get their life back when they find out they have cancer due to your stubborness.

  • Mayor Tommy Thompson 12/15/2007 6:27:00 PM

    I never realized that it would seem that I was only worried about my own business when I wrote my last comment, for this I am sorry, I am truly worried about all the businesses in and around Somerville. I have been a smoker for 35 years and I'm having a pretty hard time quitting.So I'm guilty of that also. That being said, I am also guilty of Loving this community and only want the best for all who live here. This will be my last comment, no matter what I say or do , I see that I will never be enough to fulfill everybodies opinion. Thank You and God Bless Tommy Thompson

  • Just Wondering 12/15/2007 6:26:00 PM

    Is the mayor concerned about the town or his restaurant? It's hard to tell. Perhaps if he would consider hanging a "no smoking" sign on the front door of his restaurant his business would be filled with customers who wish to eat without breathing the effects of 2nd hand smoke and the participants in this lawsuit who are keeping things stirred up in this little Texas town and need a place to hang out would go home.

  • Concerned Citizen 12/15/2007 6:26:00 PM

    Is the mayor concerned about the town or his restaurant? It's hard to tell. Perhaps if he would consider hanging a "no smoking" sign on the front door of his restaurant his business would be filled with customers who wish to eat without breathing the effects of 2nd hand smoke and the participants in this lawsuit who are keeping things stirred up in this little Texas town and need a place to hang out would go home.

  • Mayor Tommy Thompson 12/15/2007 6:25:00 PM

    Finally I speak. I am presently the Mayor of Somerville. The issue of these law suites have created many problems for the City. Economic development which has been in the forefront of our sought after plan for the future of our city is not only at a standstill but in regression. Our sales tax has decreased and our overall vision has been on hold. I am not an expert on toxins or things of that nature , so my input on this matter has no meaning. Our intire annual budget could not come close to investigating the issues at hand. The city has resolved to go with the reports that we recieve on a regular basis from the EPA and the TCEQ. Unless otherwise proven this is all we have. Is our City contaminated ? The only contamination that I can be certian of are those of the friendships and family relationships that are so important to our community. Some people have put the blame of this turmoil on myself and the City administration . They have also slandered my personal business saying that it was a den of people who inhance and contribute to the uneasiness of this on going situation. this is definately not the case.It has caused problems in my family and my restuarant. We the City need prayers,understanding and calm until these lawsuites are finally decided by a court of law. Just for those who want to Know, I have never sued anyone and never will. Thanks for reading and I hope that it wasn't to garbled. I have a lot on my mind latley. TOMMY THOMPSON

  • Eduardo Baca 12/15/2007 6:24:00 PM

    I am very concerned about living in Somerville. Besides concern about health effects, I am concerned about what happens to my property, my house, and the community that I have been part of since 1992. I am concerned about the work that I have personally done including reroofing part of the house and taking some of the older sections of roofing out for improvement. I am not part of any law suit although peripherally my wife and I could become part of the class action suit, we have not comtemplated it. We leave in a very old house pieced through rebuilding over many years the original house reportedly built in the 1940s and moved to this current location in the mid 1980s. I need to do some maintenance on the house but do not want to go through major expenses because I don't know what will happen. Will we be forced out of our house and about 8 acres of law? Will be be compensated fairly? Should I go ahead with remodeling? All of this questions bother me. I had not idea that any of these problems existed in late 1991 when we settled in Somerville.

  • Shirley Neutzler Lissner 12/15/2007 6:23:00 PM

    We are continuely amazed by these stories of cancer and birth defects in Somerville and what might have caused them. But, most are a "stretch" at best. Jessica Baade's Dad was a friend of mine. I knew him well and his Mom was the most caring, devoted woman anyone could ever know. Mrs. Baade spent almost our entire school years making us homemade buttermilk cupcakes, chicken salad sandwiches, and anything else she could possibly "home" make and bring to school. I really don't remember an occasion where Mrs. Baade wasn't contributing something and it was always food. I'm sad and sorry for what happened to Jessica, but eating vegetables from Mrs. Baade's garden is a big huge stretch and I'm really sad that she is being put in the position of a victim because her "grandmother" wouldn't have wanted her harmed in any way. Quite frankly, if there was anything in the food Mrs. Baade served that was harmful we'd all have died a very long time ago. This story about visiting Somerville while I was pregnant story is just crazy. There are just way too many of us who lived in Somerville while pregnant or visited often ... we ate the food and we drank the water, but every now and then genetics has a different plan. I'm glad to see that Jessica is a beautiful girl today and I wish her husband a safe return.

  • Karen Torres 12/15/2007 6:23:00 PM

    It�s High Noon in Somerville. Lines are being drawn and sides are being taken. Our hometown loyalty is being challenged. Ugly personal insults are being spewed. Knees are jerking. This story is horrifying from either perspective: 1. There may be a highly toxic chemical presence in Somerville that is causing people to sicken and die, which has been deliberately (or at least carelessly) perpetrated and criminally covered up, or 2. A tiny town with little or no recourse to defend itself is being unfairly characterized as a toxic place to live on the basis of possibly lawyer-driven, greed-based and certainly incomplete investigations. We who are from Somerville and may still have family living there, and who love our little home town, are shocked whichever way this thing slices. But I don�t think it�s a �For Somerville� or �Against Somerville� issue. Is it �against� Somerville to want the poisons and the cover-up, if there are such, exposed and remediated? Is it �for� Somerville to refuse to accept even the possibility that there may be toxins in the environment, and perhaps continue to have our loved ones exposed to them? (I, for one, refuse to drink that gray water, and have ordered my mother to switch to bottled water immediately!) The list of �victims� seems to be varied as to complaints, and some seem pretty far-fetched. Tilman Hein�s death, for instance, wasn�t caused by the tie plant (he died of acute necrotizing fasciitis) � but then again, he was very sick all his life and maybe that was because of the plant. And it doesn�t seem likely that chemicals could cause diabetes, or that a pregnant woman could get enough toxins eating vegetables to cause severe birth defects without seriously compromising her own health. On the other hand, exposure to creosote is known to cause skin and scrotum cancer, and high levels of fumes can cause respiratory problems and birth defects in animals. (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts85.html#bookmark05) It is true that most people in or from Somerville are about as healthy as anybody else. But just because there hasn�t been 100% morbidity doesn�t mean there is no danger. Maybe all these sick folks are just looking for someone to blame for their problems or want to take a ride on the class action gravy train. But. . .What if they�re right. . . ? We need to reserve judgment � and take precautions -- until the results are in. Only a report independent of the attorneys involved in the lawsuits can provide a truly objective analysis of whatever chemicals the tie plant may have discharged over the years, their environmental levels and the relative toxicity still present, if any. We�ll call Erin Brockovich if we need her. Karen Sager Torres SHS Class of 1968

  • MJA 12/15/2007 6:22:00 PM

    The whole idea of Somerville being contaminated is a very terrifying thought. I grew up in Snook the vast majority of my life. We would always go to the Somerville Lake, Go Grocery shopping at Brookshire Brothers, have drinks at D's. 'IF' the city is dangerous, I do hope the people who are suffering/ or suffered get what they deserve. I think it's very important that the TRUTH is reported. If they could find any documents to prove any harm to the community has been done, I think it would help everyone understand every side to the story.

  • Leslie 12/15/2007 6:21:00 PM

    I know most of the people affected by the various forms of cancer mentioned in the news articles being circulated. I went to school with some of them and others I have known many years. It is sickening to me that dollar signs have gone to the heads of so many of them. My dad worked at the Tie Plant most of his adult life; smoked most of his life; and is 83 years old and still in fair health. He fought off a bout with prostate cancer about 5 years ago; but for all I know it was caused by being exposed to Japanese artillery smoke at Iwo Jima in 1945 defending our country. Everybody in every city in our country knows a relative or friend that has contracted cancer. Somerville is no different. Maybe all of the people in Somerville should team together to fight cancer; not sue for personal gain. A town that a lot of us have lived in for most of our lives will not be here much longer if a handful of people get their way.

  • SHS Class 79 12/15/2007 6:20:00 PM

    KRHD-TV, the local ABC affiliate, picked up on the lawsuit. It interviewed Dennis Davis, Willie Woodfork, and the superintendent. The superintendent was the middle-ground interview. He said independent environmental tests at the school should be back very soon. Let�s hope those turn out better. Before the story hits mainstream media, perhaps we need to form a PR front with the people who did work there and have no ill effects. The comments about smokers is a very valid one. These �victims� are suing in a class action suit to give the perception that a large percentage of people suffered the same affects. There is an even larger group of people who suffered no affects. That�s who needs to form an alliance now. Property values are low enough in our hometown. This story and that nutty UCLA professor who compares Somerville to Love Canal could really wipe out property values and further doom what is already a fading little Texas town

  • SHS Class 59 12/15/2007 6:19:00 PM

    Well I have a comment because this article is just so stupid! All I can say is that these people are completely NUTSO!!!! I speak from this vantage point: I come from a large family who lived in one of those plant houses and we were always stomping in those water pits and chewing the tar from the barrels which were kept there on a storage dock among a lot of other things in those woods around the plant. Our house was at the most only 100 ft. from the inner workings of the plant. NONE OF US HAS ANY SYMPTOMS OF CANCER NOR HAS ANYONE OF US DIED FROM CANCER!!!!!!!! And, we all are all up in age.

  • SHS Class 68 12/15/2007 6:18:00 PM

    It would be wonderful if actual facts and not plaintiff�s attorney pleadings were cited in the paper as well, but objective facts rarely make headlines. There well could be a link to the chemicals used at the tie plant to some incidences of cancer in Somerville but the fact is that not everyone in Somerville , or who grew up in Somerville , is afflicted with cancer. Those of us who are commenting have both sympathy and empathy for those folks who suffer from cancer, it is a horrible disease, but not everything is someone else�s fault. Sometimes stuff just happens and sometimes people live lifestyles that cause things to happen, and sometimes someone or some thing causes things to happen. One thing I have learned over my 58 years, having been involved in a number of events that were reported in the media, is that rarely does the media report match the facts of the events because honest reporting of the facts usually doesn�t play to the masses or sell many papers.

  • SHS Class 68 12/15/2007 6:17:00 PM

    I tried not to, but the more I think about this article, the more I feel the need to call 'Bull****' on it. When you review the cancer cases sited in this article, most are likely 'age related' or just chance occurrences. The only two that stand out to me are the two cases of bladder cancer, which is a fairly rare cancer and is known to be linked with chemical exposure. I think a review of the histories of many of the rest will bring up other mitigating circumstances, i.e.. smoking, drinking, drug use/abuse, family history of cancer, etc. My dad died of gastric carcinoma, but at age 84+. Most of the people who worked their entire lives at the tie plant died of natural causes at ripe old ages. We have to remember.....No one gets out alive! To quote Dennis Miller, "That's just MY opinion; I COULD be wrong.

  • SHS Class 68 12/15/2007 6:17:00 PM

    While I think there may be something to the thought of the tie plant killing everyone, I think when you look at those who are having problems, I bet you will find a more common element, most, if not all the �victims� were heavy smokers. My mom and dad died after living 60 years in Somerville , but they both smoked at least one pack and maybe two a day. I would more likely guess that the toxic waste they put in their lungs from the Pall Malls and Salems had more to do with their death from cancer than from the smell of creosote. My grandmother who lived in Somerville for 87 years and didn�t smoke, died of . . . old age. Dr. Pazdral who lived in Somerville until he was who knows how old died of . . . ? This looks to me to be a search by �victims� looking for someone to blame for their troubles lead by some scumbag lawyers looking to get rich. But I really do have sympathy for those who are suffering whatever the reason so I chose to be a bit less vocal than usual. You will also note that this appeared in the Houston Press, who by what I remember, is even more of a yellow journalism rag than even the increasingly left wing rag the Houston Comical!

  • Shirley Neutzler Lissner 12/15/2007 6:15:00 PM

    Mr. Spivak, I'm going to forward you a series of emails regarding your story about "Toxic Town". You really need to hear the story from a vantage point that's very different than sensationalism. You're a reporter and it's your responsibility to do your job, but there is another story to report. Please read the emails I'm forwarding you as they are from people who DO NOT resonate in ignorance! My hope is that you will receive a few more emails that might turn you into a "true" investigative reporter. I grew up in Somerville and I now live in Spring, Texas. I moved to Houston in 1974. My Mother still lives in Somerville and she will be 83 next week. She has had cancer twice, but neither can be blamed on Somerville or the tie plant. Some of the people who cited the "tie plant" as the source of their troubles have been heavy, heavy smokers for years and years. They have had bouts of cancer and never put down the cigarettes in spite of their situation. Linda Faust is "smoking" to this day! Your article was not only inaccurate, but embarrassing as it seems that Somerville is a town full of ignorant red necks which it's NOT. Somerville supplied many of us with the basis we needed to go on and get an education that has allowed us to be productive, successful people. Educations that were fueled by the labors of our parents who worked at the "tie plant" or provided services to "those who worked at the tie plant". There was a story that aired this week that reported that people can't even "take a bath" because the water is so bad. That's just not true. I'm going to forward you an email in that regard. But, draw your own conclusions and then do the math....Somerville town of 1700........200 complaints over the past 40 years (solicited compliants).... 1.176% of the population. If you want to do some thought provocative interviews, I can give you a list of people who lived the "tie plant" life who had positive experiences and it's more than 1.176% of the population. Thanks for the time you spent reading this email and if you want a little more fuel ... then bring it on because I think there a few people who are up to the fight and it's more than 1.176% of the population~~!

  • Jack Stamps Campbell 12/15/2007 6:15:00 PM

    That's a great article.....from a plaintiffs' attorney point of view...I think Todd Spivak must be one of the plaintiff's (article writers)...I worked there for several years (right alongside of Dennis and Slim & doing the same jobs as them) and was in and around the by products of the plant for over 33 years. I seem to be OK, which to some may be a matter of debate. Jack Stamps Campbell

  • Shirley Neutzler Lissner 12/15/2007 6:14:00 PM

    Bottled water is now a staple in almost every home in America. Why is the water in Somerville being singled out? Most everyone now drinks bottled water. I don't live in Somerville now although I did grow up there. I live in Spring, Texas and I don't drink water from the tap here either. The press reported the water in Somerville was so bad that the residents couldn't even bathe in it. My Mother still lives in Somerville and unlike "the press" reported, she uses the water to take bath, wash clothes, wash dishes and cook. My Mother is 83 years old! I'm ataching a copy of an email sent to me over the week-end in regard to an interview with a Somerville resident regarding the water in Somerville: Just a quick point of interest.....Somerville's water supply comes from deep wells just outside of Lyons, at least 5 miles North ("upstream") of the tie plant and all its attendant pollution. If she (the interviewee) has problems with her water, she should check her own plumbing.

  • Camilla 12/15/2007 6:12:00 PM

    IS SOMERVILLE CONTAMINATED? THE ANSWER IS YES, BUT WHAT ABOUT PASADENA. BRYAN COLLEGE STATION, BRENHAM, OR EVEN HOUSTON TEXAS WERE THE ESTEEMED LAWYERS MAKE THEIR HOME. WE HAVE ALL KNOWN FOR SOME TIME THAT OUR PLANET IS CONTAMINATED IN EVERY CORNER. IS SOMERVILLE WORSE THAN MOST PLACES? IF MY OPINION COUNTS, IT IS NOT. WE HAVE MANY EXAMPLES WITHIN OUR OWN GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED LONG HEALTHY LIVES HERE IN GOOD OLD SOMERVILLE. YES, SOME HAVE BEEN AFFECTED, BUT I BELIEVE THEY WERE PREDISPOSED AND WOULD HAVE GOTTEN CANCER WHERE EVER THEY LIVED. I BELIEVE THERE IS A GENETIC WEAKNESS THAT ALLOWS ONE PERSON TO BE AFFECTED WHILE THE NEXT ONE IS NOT. DO THEY DESERVE A SETTLEMENT, PERHAPS, BUT IN THIS TYPE OF LAWSUIT WITH THIS LAW FIRM, IN MY OPINION THE MAIN WINNERS OR THE LAWYERS? THEY ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR STIMULATING THIS HORRIFIC PRESS. THERE IS NO GOOD TIME FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO STRIKE AN AREA LIKE THE PLAGUE. BUT THIS IS A PARTICULARLY BAD TIME FOR OUR HOMETOWN. AS MANY OF YOU KNOW WE WERE MAKING TRUE HEADWAY HERE ON SEVERAL FRONTS AND HAD SEVERAL NEW PROJECTS IN THE WORKS THAT WOULD REALLY BENEFIT OUR AREA. THIS KIND OF STUFF PUTS ALL OF THAT ON HOLD AND INVESTORS WILL SOON MAKE INVESTMENTS IN A LESS CONTROVERSIAL SETTING. HOWEVER, I SOMETIMES WONDER IF DEVALUATING THE AREA IS NOT ALSO PART OF THE PLAN, BUY CHEAP AND THEN REALIZE WELL IT IS NOT AS BAD AS WE THOUGHT AND WE WILL BUILD A NICE WHATEVER HERE TO HELP THE LOCAL ECONOMY AS WELL AS OUR OWN POCKETBOOK. WE HAVE MORE STRANGERS SNIFFING AROUND NOW THAT EVER BEFORE. I AM NOT SURE WHAT ALL THIS MEANS, BUT I DO NOT THINK IT IS GOOD AND IT DOES NOT MEAN A CLEANER SETTING. MANY OF YOU KNOW MY AREA AND IT LOOKS SO PRISTINE, BUT FOR EONS IN THE PAST WE BOMBARDED IT WITH POISONS, INCLUDING ARSENIC. THEREFORE, WE ARE CONTAMINATED AS WELL. THE ONE THING THAT WE HAVE GOING FOR US THAT MANY AREAS DO NOT IS THAT WE HAVE SO MANY TREES WHICH ANYONE WITH ANY SENSE KNOWS HELPS TO CLEAN UP THE AREA. THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS AND I AM SPEAKING FOR ONLY MYSELF. SOMERVILLE FOR SEVERAL REASONS IS OPEN TO SCUMBAGS WANTING TO MAKE FAST BUCKS AND NOT CARE WHAT THEY BREAK OR WHO THEY HURT. HOWEVER WE ARE TOUGHER THAN THEY MIGHT IMAGINE AND WE HAVE A HISTORY OF CRAWLING OUT OF THE MUCK. WE WILL SURVIVE! PLEASE THINK AND EXPRESS POSITIVE THOUGHTS FOR US. MERRY CHRISTMAS! CAMILLA

  • Christine 12/15/2007 6:11:00 PM

    am writing you in regards to the monority information that you printed about Somerville causing illnesses and in some cases, death. Do me a HUGE favor and give the rest of us a chance to be interviewed as well. I am 56 years old and my dad would have been 83 had he not succumed to a WWll closed head injury! When he was but a young child, he worked and the "tie plant" for 25 cents a day as a water boy. He never left Somerville except during the war years when he fought for this country, this little town we "hometowners" call HOME. Those fighting to shut our home down are move-in's and money hungry for lack of WANTING to work. I could fill your paper, for those who read it. So could so many, many citizens of Somerville. Falsified lawsuits. Do some research about the past of these same people. Do some research before you believe the money diggers. Please. My brother worked for Santa Fe and BNSF for 30+ years and is healthy as a horse! He retired this year. So did my older brother, sister-in-law and me. Jack Stamps worked with creasote for all of those years. Go figure. One of the now deceased former Superintendents of the "tie plant" has his widow still alive and there is nothing wrong with her and she's pushinhg 100! They lived on the tie plant premises until the homes were moved to provide more space. I spent many, many hours at their home playing. My parents were best friends with them. My own mother passed in 2000. At the request of one person we trust, she and I went to her cancer doctor and had all tests run, ruling OUT any chemical causes. Gee......she was here for how long? Sir, there are tons of storied out there...........YOU need to find them and give the citizens who care a chance to be heard. In the love of Somerville and the truth......

  • Voice of Reason 12/15/2007 6:10:00 PM

    Somerville is my hometown and while I would naturally be concerned by these allegations, I also realize this is fueled by lawyers. What we need is an independent assessment of the situation instead of alarmist rhetoric. While I feel for these "victims," it will be difficult to directly connect their ailments to the tie plant. Other contributing factors such as smoking and genetics must be taken into account. It's good that the school superintendent is a voice of reason because it doesn't appear that the city's administration is going to take the lead on dealing with this issue.

  • Somerville Citizen 12/12/2007 3:14:00 PM

    Readers, notice the lovely home where the picture of Dennis is taken. That was bought with monies from a separate lawsuit. No details here, it was pretty embarrassing as to the reason for the lawsuit. Bedroom stuff. Lawsuit hungry? Yes. Smoking, excessive alcohol and illegal drugs is more likely the cause of some of these problems. I do feel empathy for those suffering with their health........anyone with a life threatening disease deserves prayers and empathy. I offer both. The fund raisers to raise the special needs persons over and over have gotten to be rediculous and a standing joke in some circles. Have a Blessed Day!

  • Chris Leichtle 12/12/2007 4:05:00 AM

    You quickly disposed of two cancer cluster study done in Somerville by the INDEPENDENT Texas Department of Health with comments from Dr. Dahlgren who is not INDEPENDENT. Dahlgren works for plaintiff�s attorney Jared Woodfill. Did you ever Google Dalgren�s name, ask him how much he has billed on this case or did you even call UCLA Medical School and see if he is on their staff? Obviously, the answers to these three questions are NO or you would have not put so much blind faith in Dahlgren.

  • Christine 12/11/2007 10:49:00 PM

    Some of you Brenhamites ask if the lake water is tested? Guess what? THAT is where YOU get your drinking water dude! It's piped to you and YOUR town is responsible for the water purification. Do your homework before you get all worked up.

  • Cory Kallhoff 12/10/2007 11:42:00 AM

    It is a sad state of affairs that we live in a country where the Government agencies created to protect us are a part of the capatilist system that values the almighty dollar above a human life. Ever since corporations were allowed to lobby the congress and contribute to political campaigns we have lived in a country controlled by rampant commercialism. People affected by this are traditionally discounted by "expert" testimony that the effects of living in such a manner is not destructive to human lives. I am no tree hugger just a realist, But even I am aware that there are ecologically sound ways to acheive any goal that we as a world set for ourselves. It is part of human nature to seek to better ourselves, but somewhere along the way we began to equate material successes with the ideal of betterment. Living in this manner has created a society of have's and have not's. This method of living is no longer sustainable. If a government of the people and for "The People" she serves has failed then the responsibility of everyone hurt by "Economic Security" should raise their voices in unison and let that Government know that it has failed. Human lives make the whole profit motive ideal possible, so it stands to reason that the importance of every human life should be considered before any ideal of profit is entertained. Cory Kallhoff Grapevine, Tx turningwrenches@gmail.com

  • cactusflinthead 12/08/2007 10:41:00 PM

    I was in Somerville today. I wonder how much of it has drifted with the wind into neighboring fields and farms. This is what happens when we have a "business friendly" legislature and court system. Unless the Feds step in, which won't happen until after January at the earliest, there will be not one single thing done to protect the health of anybody concerning toxic waste and pollution such as this. Yeah, the business of America is business. Thanks Calvin.

  • Collen Clark 12/07/2007 2:18:00 AM

    We have a similar situation in a case in Texarkana with Kerr-McGee. There is a lot of disimformation the industry has created and developed to avoid liability. Unfortunately the Texas Legislature and the Supreme Court of Texas has sided with Industry time and again. Recently an Appelate court in Houston threw out a creosote case against a Railroad co. that Dalgren testified in. He had done a great job and the court bent over backwards in its ruling. The science is solid on these chemicals and I hope the courts catch up and start protecting the people of this state. Especially in East Texas where the most Superfund sites exist; all related to wood treatment.

  • RH 12/06/2007 5:35:00 AM

    Has anybody tested Lake Somerville? I'm trying to remember if I ever actually got it the water. I used to drive through that shittly little town all the time in college. Now I know it didn't just look like a town full of poison.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy