Dallas' Inland Port of Gall

Old boys act like a bunch of hicks over the inland port that could mean progress in South Dallas

I write a lot about how the city, Dallas proper, needs to defend itself against the suburbs. Sometimes I feel as if we are an urban Jerusalem surrounded by Nebuchadnezzar and all his Babylonian, golf-playing horde.

But lately I'm wondering: Who's the horde? Them or us?

I'm talking about this "inland port" thing, but please put that term out of your mind, because it doesn't make any sense. How can there be a port in Dallas? How will the ships get here? Won't it scrape all the paint off their bottoms?

They already do get here. Sort of. Look, it's not something any of us can grasp easily, because it's so new and beyond our ken. Trains haul shipping containers here from Pacific Coast ports and the Port of Houston. The containers are hoisted onto trucks in Dallas and then hauled to the Northeast or to warehouses the size of small towns in southern Dallas and Dallas County.

The bottom line is that this new "logistics" industry could make Dallas the biggest shipping center on the continent.

I know. Who knew?

There are other spots around the nation where this operation could develop instead, and some of them already are being developed in competition with this one. The one reason for it to be here is Richard Allen, a shipping magnate from California.

Allen came here five years ago, looked around, said, "This is it," and bought 6,000 acres in southern Dallas County. If this is it, it's because of him.

I wrote about this whole thing November 13 in a column called, "The Big Stall." I said Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price and Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert are working together to screw up and sabotage the inland port in ways that would seem to benefit the Ross Perot family, which owns a directly competing shipping facility in Tarrant County around their privately owned Alliance Airport.

The Perots are not the bad guys here. They're just pursuing their own interests. Ross Perot Jr. calls the southern Dallas inland port a "direct threat" to the shipping center his family has developed at Alliance.

The problem is the mayor of Dallas and Commissioner Price. They should be fighting for the interests of their own constituents. Instead, they are pushing for land-use studies and rules and enforcement for the Dallas inland port, all of which threaten to stall the inland port and turn the advantage toward the Perots at Alliance.

I suggested in my last column about this that Leppert and Price have joined in a kind of sicko good-old-boy embrace: They want to help a well-connected local family ward off competition from an outsider, even if it means screwing their own constituents.

As if to prove my point, Commissioner Price called me the day after the story came out and accused me and Allen of being "carpetbaggers."

I moved here from Detroit 30 years ago. I checked with my wife that evening. She's a Dallas native. I asked how long I'm going to be a carpetbagger. She said until I die. OK, so I give Price a point on that one.

But he also was calling Richard Allen a carpetbagger, a point he made again in a letter to the Observer. "The only thing worse than a carpetbagger is a convening or collaboration of the same," he said in the letter.

Carpetbagger? This guy is trying to change southern Dallas from an impoverished Third World slum into a boomtown.

I need to say right here that John Wiley Price's position on this is not universally shared. A couple weeks ago I attended a breakfast meeting of the Oak Cliff Chamber of Commerce at which Richard Allen was the featured—and, I must say, honored—guest. The proceedings opened with an invocation in which the pastor called on the deity to bless Richard Allen.

Then Allen was introduced by John Ellis Price (no relation). This Price is vice chancellor of the University of North Texas over the new UNT southern Dallas campus, where he is developing a whole "logistics" curriculum to prepare students for management positions in the industry expected to spring up in and around the Allen Group developments.

Vice Chancellor Price opened by making sure everybody in the large audience understood that his relationship with Allen is more than professional. Speaking to Allen, who was standing at his side, but also to the audience, Price said: "On my most recent visit to California in October, I had a chance to meet you and members of your family and friends. I had an absolutely delightful time."

Vice Chancellor Price said he spent part of his time driving Allen's vintage pickup on the streets of San Diego. Then he launched into a description of the Allen project and what it promises:

"The 6,000-acre master plan with 60 million square feet of distribution, manufacturing, office and retail development is slated to become one of the biggest economic engines for northern Texas," he said.

"The Dallas Logistics Hub is projected to create 31,000 new direct jobs, plus 32,000 new indirect jobs. The hub also expects to increase the tax base for the municipalities of Dallas, Lancaster, Wilmer and Hutchins by $2.4 billion. The economic impact of the facility, construction and employment for operations within the hub from 2006 to 2035 is projected to be $68.85 billion dollars."

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • 09/04/2009 1:52:00 PM

    Heck, *Tulsa* has an inland port, and it's twice as far from saltwater as the DFW area, so why can't we have one here? True, we won't be seeing, say, the USS Nimitz or the QE 2 sail into Big D (or, more accurately, Lancaster), maybe nothing much grander than river barges. Still, a port here would connect us to the entire planet's waters. Full disclosure: I own two small pieces of commercial property just inside the edge of the area predicted to benefit from an inland port, so naturally I have a rather keen interest in the project. I have absolutely nothing against the Perots, and would be quite happy to see them work together with the port authority and seek areas of synergy, just as I would like to see the port work together with authorities at places such as DFW and Love Field airports, and with the rail companies. Obviously, I'm most displeased with any and all who would obstruct this project, whatever their reason might be. This project stands to benefit not only the Metroplex. Consider, for example, the huge amount of trade along the "NAFTA Corridor," especially along the stretch from the border with Mexico all the way to Oklahoma City -- and that's leaping further north towards Kansas City. In years past, I've even seen references on federal websites to the "San Antonio-Oklahoma City Economic Region" (or something along those lines). And why not? we talk about the Metroplex, with its several counties and scores of municipalities as a single unit in a number of ways, including some economic ones.

  • wr 12/15/2008 1:29:00 PM

    Another Allen Group supporter trying to advocate the creation of Allen2 Texas by allowing private business to dick-tate the course of Southern Dallas County instead of letting the Commissioner do his job. And yes, so you can rest assured, I am a white republican, and I am taking a black Democrat Commissioner (who has proven his loyalty and dedication) over a white republican business owner because it is right for Southern Dallas County.

  • Joyce Foreman 12/10/2008 9:57:00 PM

    I am a southern sector resident and believe that the development of the Inland Port is important to all of Dallas. What is so distrubing to me is that I watch the Dallas City Council give millions of dollars through TIF's for incentives in the downtown and other areas of Dallas for re-invest in Dallas. Dallas also is wanting to spend upto $500 million for a tax-payer owned convention center hotel which would create 700 jobs, but the city can not find the will to work with The Allen Group to create over 30,000 jobs and an additional 30,000 jobs in surrounding development. This would be good for all of Dallas. I wish someone could explain to me how the development at Alliance Airport will help Lancaster, Wilmer, Hutchins or Dallas? Alliance is in Tarrent County so it does not even help Dallas County. I am all for regional cooperation but not at the expense of 60,000 needed jobs in the sourthrn sector.

  • Francesco Sinibaldi 12/10/2008 6:51:00 PM

    In a thought. In a fanciful thought there's the light of a shade and the song of an intense emotion. Francesco Sinibaldi

  • SocraticGadfly 12/09/2008 11:02:00 PM

    And, what's up with Lancaster Mayor Marcus Knight? I haven't found any direct connection between him and Perot. But, if not that, is he in JWP's hip pocket? That's the only way I can explain his stubborn insistence on the "study" going through. http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-lancaster-mayor-in-perot-family.html

  • Keith 12/08/2008 7:56:00 PM

    What a shame to see Dallas politics getting in the way of much needed development in South Dallas. South Dallas is like a whole other world, underdeveloped and largely forgotten by everyone. That needs to change.

  • Tumon Tamuning 12/05/2008 2:57:00 AM

    Dude, all we need to do is publicly ridicule silly politicians by making -- and distributing -- Tijuana Bibles featuring them.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy