"David is able to distill the essence of a case to the current knowledge known about alcohol relating to breath and blood," says Wimbish, who spends many afternoons at the county courthouse testifying for a number of defense lawyers at a rate of $120 an hour. "David deals with the facts. He is a pretty good scientist."

Burrows also uses science to attack the field sobriety tests—that series of balance and mental acuity exams that officers ask drivers like Andrea to perform at the roadside. Officers will testify that the tests are accurate and backed up by studies conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Burrows has his own expert to counter a failed sobriety test—a former police officer and Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission commander named Dexter Simpson.

DWI lawyer David Burrows in the hallway leading to his corner office, surrounded by framed not-guilty verdicts.
Mark Graham
DWI lawyer David Burrows in the hallway leading to his corner office, surrounded by framed not-guilty verdicts.
A woman arrested for DWI during a no-refusal weekend braces inside Lew Sterrett jail before being stuck with a needle. In her left hand she clutches a search warrant
that orders her to give up her blood.
Dallas Police Video
A woman arrested for DWI during a no-refusal weekend braces inside Lew Sterrett jail before being stuck with a needle. In her left hand she clutches a search warrant that orders her to give up her blood.

According to NHTSA, a simple test like watching to see if a suspect's eyes follow a moving light smoothly or if they jerk—called the horizontal gaze nystagmus test—is an accurate measure of drunkenness up to 95 percent of the time. Not quite, Simpson testified in a recent Burrows case. Both Wimbish and Simpson have delved into the NHTSA's own data to find, they claim, that the test produces false positives 59 percent of the time.

Like Wimbish, Simpson has made a career out of testifying as an expert on behalf of defense lawyers in DWI cases. He's even written a book, The DWI Conspiracy, alleging a plot in the manipulation of the field sobriety tests that result in the faulty arrests of thousands of innocents—though Burrows doesn't bring up the book at trial.

"We respect the court system," Simpson says. "We just beat it every chance that we get, because it's defeatable. I shouldn't be able to win these cases like this. It should be difficult, but it's not."

At least for now.

----

It's St. Patrick's Day no-refusal weekend, and Senior Corporal Bobby Watkins, a member of the Dallas DWI squad, is on duty Saturday night. Only 15 minutes after pulling out of central headquarters, he's called to where a possible drunk driver was stopped heading the wrong way down a one-way street. At the scene, an Expedition is parked on the sidewalk on Elm Street. The woman behind the wheel is wearing a festive, bright green T-shirt.

"We're doing blood tonight," says Watkins, a cheerful cop with a whisper of a voice, as he parks his squad car. He directs a spotlight into the windshield of the Expedition and walks over. The sobbing woman has red hair stuck in clumps to her face. Watkins asks how much she's had to drink. "Two drinks," she says. "Oh, two drinks?" he repeats. (On the way over here, Watkins told me that virtually every driver he faces says they had only two drinks.) The woman's left leg is in a splint, and she limps away from her car at Watkins' request. Between sobs, she says she is a single mother of three.

Watkins tells her to hold the grill of the squad car while he performs a series of field sobriety tests. He's looking for at least four clues that she's drunk. Counting backward from 48 to 33, she skips 45. She recites the alphabet correctly. Then he asks her to focus on a red penlight as he moves it broadly to one side and back. Her light eyes follow it. Her mascara has run and collected to form a smudged ring below her eyes. He sees her eyes jerk during the eye test. Next, he removes a portable breath machine. He can't use the reading in court, but it helps to confirm his decision to arrest the woman. She scores 0.184.

She's placed in handcuffs and starts squirming because her bladder is full. She needs to go now, she complains, but there's nothing but a vacant parking lot and multi-storied garage nearby. As Watkins fills out more paperwork, urine collects in a pool below her sneakers.

In the Dallas Police Department, there are usually 10 officers on the DWI task force specializing in DWI cases. The squad knows what it takes to win at trial.

"We're building a case right from the start," Watkins says as he drives to the jail, where the single mother will be booked and have her blood drawn. "If you arrested this person, you got them off the street. That's a win-win for us and for the citizens of Dallas. But once you get them in the jail, and they refuse to give samples, even though they had six clues, then they win the prize."

Watkins says that everything he does in the field is geared toward a future trip to the witness stand. First, he determines if there is enough reasonable suspicion to stop a car—say, driving the wrong way down Elm Street. Next, he uses his senses. "What do you see? What do you smell? What do you hear? You see bloodshot eyes. Or you ask for their license, and they hand you a credit card. Or they are fumbling with the license and dropping it on the floor." Then, "What do you smell? Alcohol." Finally, "What do you hear? 'Officer, I had two beers.' Well, maybe they did, but then they are giving you inconsistent statements." The woman in green says she had her first drink at 7, but then says she had her first drink after leaving her house, which was at 4 p.m. So Watkins asks her again, and she says 5.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Matt 05/19/2009 5:01:00 PM

    Jesse, Which innocent people are you referring to? When cops are forcing you to take a blood test against your will, I see an unnecessary invasion of privacy, and an assumption of guilt until proven innocent. So how is innocence protected in this case?

  • Jesse 05/10/2009 2:37:00 PM

    Look you boneheads.....alcohol is a drug. As such it is incumbant upon you to use it responsibly. That means when you're going to be consuming , DON'T DRIVE!!!!!!! Is that simple enough you self-centered party animals? Hurray for the blood tests and the truly innocent people they protect. See you who are screaming at the Hotel Lou.

  • Greg 04/21/2009 10:31:00 AM

    If people are'nt supposed to drive after having drinks then why do bars have parking lots? ;-/

  • Dovan Barvc 04/19/2009 12:10:00 AM

    Joe S is absolutely correct. People get in traffic accidents. Many of them have not consumed alcoholic beverages. Some have. Just because someone is over an arbitrary limit of blood alcohol content does not mean that caused the accident. The definition of alcohol related is rediculous since it covers anyone in the vehicle. Presumably, if the driver was over the legal limit and sitting stock still at a stop light and was rear ended by a police car traveling at a high rate of speed it would be an alcohol related accident. I have known people who after a few drinks affirmatively drive more carefully than they otherwise would and are perfectly capable of driving safely. Of course, I've know a couple of people who shouldn't be walking, much less driving. The statistic in your article that the "drunk" driver gets away with it 70 times before he gets caught belies the hysteria of MADD since that statistic would be even lower if it correlated legally impaired driving with actual accidents caused by the impairment. It will be interesting to see what a jury thinks about whether it is self defense to try to prevent someone from sticking a needle in your arm.

  • Oliver 04/11/2009 11:19:00 AM

    I lived in Dallas '99-'03. One year, I wanted to go to McKinney avenue for St Patrick's day, which happened to be on a Friday. I found out that the only bus I could figure out was going there from the East Transit Center was only going ONCE PER HOUR. That's when I told myself "You know, I never realized it's the purpose of a transit system to encourage people to drink and drive". Get real, if you can't reach an area like McKinney with public transit on a Friday evening, let alone St Patricks, yes, you're going to have people who DUI. But Dallas is not precisely the city where it's an alternative to walk for 2h, the way some folks here in Europe do.

  • Slim Jim Phantom 04/06/2009 4:02:00 AM

    So, we have a bunch of drunks being defended by a tax cheat? Isn't America great?

  • Joe S. 04/03/2009 5:52:00 PM

    DWI is a lie. MADD gets to 50% 'alcohol related' by including anyone with any alcohol in their system in any way involved in the accident. The individual doesn't have to be at fault or even be driving for it count as 'alcohol related'. The truth is that 12% of vehicular fatalities are the fault of a legally intoxicated driver. That's 1 in 8. And you can easily check the numbers for yourself by reviewing the fatal accidents in the DFW area over the last 2 weeks (and if you go back 2 weeks from today that even covers the major drinking holiday of St. Patricks Day when you'd think there'd be a spike). Just because only the DWI related make it to the front page of the paper doesn't mean it's the #1 cause of fatal accidents. 88% of fatalities are not the fault of a legally intoxicated driver. Even if no one ever drove under the influence of alcohol the numer of fatalities would drop less than 12%. And the truth is that the cause of the other 88% applies equally to the those where the driver is legally intoxicated so the reduction would be less than 4%. For this I should give up my freedom? There are better ways to improve our roadways. Don't believe the hype.

  • Kevin 04/03/2009 9:22:00 AM

    I agree with the previous posters. In cities where there are trollies and interurban railways, the DWI offenses go way down because of accessibility to transit systems. We have a constitutional right (just as many white collar criminals do) NOT to incriminate ourselves. It's called "the 5th" for a reason. If law enforcement succeeds in perpetuating this trend, let's hope we can force politicians to a forced, surprise lie detector.

  • ashvega 04/03/2009 1:50:00 AM

    I also feel a better, but more difficult strategy, for MADD would be to use its large political clout to support public transportation and other alternatives. It seems the lack of this agenda shows MADD is more concerned with temperance and a total ban on drinking, than a simple stop to drunken driving. If this is not the case I would like to see MADD support a responsible drinking event, perhaps have a wine tasting after the next meeting - with safe transportation of course provided.

  • Jay 04/02/2009 11:07:00 PM

    I'm so sick of shortsighted policies and organizations like MADD, not just in Dallas but around this country. Drunk driving is terrible, but inevitable. For thousands of years people of all ages have been drinking alcohol and going home. Pretty basic human behavior. The sad thing and the thing that we need to put more effort into changing is the fact that we constructed cities which made this basic behavior so potentially harmful to society. IF the police, city of Dallas, and organizations like MADD REALLY wanted to make things better they would throw more weight behind sustainable urban design, trolley's, shuttles from the train stations as well as longer running times from the DART train system and said shuttles and more emphasis on special event days. Instead they focus on an effect of the root problem as if it is in itself the problem. Get real. If you look around the country there's a strong correlation between places that are car dependent with few other transportation options and DWI problems. There's a fundamental issue that Dallas has to solve here before we can say anything positive has been accomplished. That underlying issue should be getting more of our energies and tax dollars. That's how we'll save lives.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy