By Jim Schutze
By Rachel Watts
By Lauren Drewes Daniels
By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
By Eric Nicholson
Too Much for Too Little
It's very hard to say anything negative about a pseudo-charitable organization, but I am able to force my way through it.
I am more of a math guy: $7,000,000 in operating expenses this year...400 people helped this year. That means $17,500 per person helped. I will gladly take that $17,500 and help a person get back on their feet. And with the remaining $16,000 I will go buy two brand-new wave runners.
Good lord. That is a lot of money. Luckily, the taxpayers are paying the bills, so it doesn't matter. It reminds me of running for city council and one of the folks I was running against said he didn't care how much the hotel costs as long it helped one person find a job. We should have just given that one guy the 500 mil and called it a day.
Do the math. Seriously.
Is it good to help people? Absolutely. Do we need places like this? Absolutely. Should we try to do more? Absolutely. But if the taxpayers were not paying the bill we would get relatively the same results with less money.
The government can't do anything without spending way too much to do it. I am a huge Angela Hunt fan, but on this I think she should read the book The Law by Frederic Bastiat, and she may come to understand that there is a big difference between philanthropy and misplaced philanthropy.
I attended an event and gave a donation to the shelter; had I known how much I was already being charged, I might have reconsidered...
No one wants to admit it, but it all goes back to single-member districts. It's a lot easier to bribe one council person than an entire council, particularly when the council person doesn't have much of an income from a nonpolitical real job or business. Registering lobbyists won't do much. Taking zoning and other controls out of the hands of financially irresponsible single-member council people will.
Robin Phelan from Dallas, via dallasobserver.com
We're Never wrong
A lot of coaches in the NFL are on the hot seat. Being a Cowboy fan and an optimist—at the same time a realist—I think you should get off Wade Phillips' back. Granted, if they don't make the playoffs this year I agree that we should go in a different direction. You're being too critical of him; fire some of it at Mr. Jones, who brought in all the troublemakers. I still hope T.O. will become a team player, same is true for the rest of the crew that lost their jobs.
Remember a couple of years ago Tom Coughlin was in a lot of trouble in New York? He made a big change and allowed his leaders to take control, and the result was a Super Bowl victory. The Cowboys are certainly capable.
It's a hell of a lot better to be an optimist than a pessimist. You reporters should learn that. For the most part, all you get is dirty laundry from the media. Tons of people crave to hear some good news. Will you admit to everyone publicly that you were wrong if they make the playoffs and win?
Coach Nasche from Tyler, via dallasobserver.com
I am so disappointed in the review, although it may be well-deserved. There have been many plays at Garland Civic that have been astounding. Unfortunately, your review indicates that this is not one of them. I do hope that corrections can be made so that audiences will grow and not decrease. Community theater is absolutely necessary to the emotional health of our city during a time of intense emotional and financial stress to families and individuals. A night at the theater at a convenient location is one way to relieve stress and to take a short "mental health" break. Please do not fail to come back and to write a well-deserved better review of future productions.
Dorothy from Garland, via dallasobserver.com
"Josh vs. Josh," By Richie Whitt, August 20
Race Matters, Religion too
I just wanted to take a moment to applaud you for your courage in standing up and being absolutely honest in this article. It would have been much easier to have taken a "holier than thou" approach to the issue, but instead you admitted your faults and still approached the issue properly.
I am a white man and a die-hard Mavericks fan, and I too have found myself down on Josh Howard for his antics of seasons past. Your article really makes me think about the reality of racism in myself, even though I have no issues keeping any race as company.
Anyway, thank you again for being an honest man and taking an approach that 999 out of 1,000 journalists would never dream of taking.
If you think blaming it on racism is silly, then what do you blame it on? Josh Howard is a nice guy too. He does wonderful things for the community not only here but also in his hometown of Winston/Salem. It made me sick when J-Ho was crucified in the media. And it makes me sick that Hamilton is not. I think it's because of racism, and it's because the media doesn't want to criticize a Bible-thumping hypocrite. Oh my god...to say something bad about a guy who says he plays a sport for "God's glory"! Heaven forbid!