So, at some point last summer, Brent Brown got on the phone with the Urban Re:Vision people, and this is what he said, according to Freed: "Austin? What about Dallas?"

"My argument was, if you do this in San Francisco it's just going to be another project," Brown says now. "But in Texas, if you look below the surface, there are some pretty interesting things happening in regards to alternative energy. And we are a pro-developer city. Besides, someone has already torn down everything, so we have a blank parking lot and a blank canvas. The question is, If you are going to start with the blank canvas, then where should you start?"

John Greenan, and Brent Brown, creators of affordable housing, believe a parking lot behind
City Hall can sprout a cutting-edge, green, sustainable
building.
Brandon Thibodeaux
John Greenan, and Brent Brown, creators of affordable housing, believe a parking lot behind City Hall can sprout a cutting-edge, green, sustainable building.
The Entangled Bank, is a favorite among voters polled nationally by Urban Re:Vision.
The Entangled Bank, is a favorite among voters polled nationally by Urban Re:Vision.

At first, the other Urban Re:Visionists looked in east downtown, toward Deep Ellum; Freed especially liked that idea. (At least they'd be close to bars.) But Brown knew just the place: a dollar-a-day parking lot behind Dallas City Hall.

This is how Greenan and Brown wound up in charge of building the most fantastic project Dallas has ever seen—even if, for now, it exists only in a short stack of conceptual renderings and cost estimates and engineering specs.

And then there's the question of costs. The project's capped at $60 million—just a fraction of what the city will pay to build its new convention center hotel, but nevertheless a pretty stiff bill for a pair of project managers with nonprofit groups. Who's paying for this again?

That and other questions are being addressed at this very moment, as Greenan and Brown plot their course in the hopes of getting this...this...thing off the ground within the next 14 months. The two men are working alongside the higher-ups at The Real Estate Council—a powerful consortium of Dallas real estate execs, powerbrokers, bankers and development hot shots—to see if this is as viable as they keep insisting it is.

But, again, what is it? Oh, right, a building that will "fertilize an old parking lot in the hopes that dormant seeds of retail, commercial, residential and social equality, if given water in the form of education and teaching, and sunlight, represented in the sustainable movement of nature and man, can encourage this block to flourish and grow beyond its original footprint." Or so say the architects responsible for one of three contenders to fill the spot—the same architects who have suggested putting smaller-than-normal cows on a "sky pasture" perched above downtown.

So, that answers that: When will this get built? When cows fly.

----

The notion of a live-work-play development is not exactly new to Dallas. The West Village, Mockingbird Station and Legacy Town Center have all created variations on the theme. In Greenan's and Brown's vision, however, instead of a prefabricated, prechewed miniature Manhattan populated by the upscale and the overpriced, there would be a self-sustaining "community" living off the grid and eating off the building. The amenities will, most likely, be familiar, so utterly Dallas: a spa, a specialty slow-food eatery, a rockin' gym, a performance space, shops downstairs. But the method of their making will be utterly foreign. The electricity would come from photovoltaic panels and tiny combined heat-and-power chips and vertical-axis wind turbines; the water, collected from ponds filled with runoff rainwater and from recycled bath water; and food, grown on rooftops and the building's very walls. All this would be planted but a few steps from the Dallas Convention Center and the Dallas Farmers Market and AT&T headquarters and the central library and, of course, City Hall. And, more to the point, just within reach of the Cedars and Old City Park that sit just across Interstate 30 but might as well be miles away.

"All those places are all job centers," Brown says. "They aren't high-paying jobs, but they are all good jobs. To achieve the great potential of the Cedars, you have to figure out how to bridge downtown and the Cedars. I don't mean bridge as in build an I-30 deck park. You've got to get things happening in the middle...This is an activator."

And, no doubt, it all sounds so very out-of-reach—looks it too, as evidenced by the illustrations accompanying this piece. Said one commenter on the Dallas Observer's news blog, Unfair Park, one of the entries "kinda looks like what Logan saw after he emerged from his Run." And more than once on the blog it has been mentioned, even by fans of the winners and proponents of the project, that they all resemble something featured on the History Channel show Life After People. Or I Am Legend. Or Planet of the Apes. Anything apocalyptic. Anything abandoned and overgrown and left to return to nature.

That's precisely the point. This is not science fiction—ask Patrick Blanc, who has draped the Athenaeum hotel in London with what Wired in its September issue called "an eight-story antigravity forest composed of 12,000 plants" that grow on a "techno-trellis" irrigated as though by raindrops falling in the woods. Out in El Paso, a company is manufacturing vertical farms intended to be planted in city centers, hydroponics skyscrapers upon which crops move up and down on conveyor belts depending upon the amount of water and sunlight needed for growth. As Time wrote in December 2008, "As the world's population grows—from 6.8 billion now to as much as 9 billion by 2050—we could run out of productive soil and water. Most of the population growth will occur in cities that can't easily feed themselves. Add the fact that modern agriculture and everything associated with it—deforestation, chemical-laden fertilizers and carbon-emitting transportation—is a significant contributor to climate change, and suddenly vertical farming doesn't seem so magic beanstalk in the sky."

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Will Warner 10/13/2009 9:28:00 AM

    I know building a wall of straw sounds like something only the first of the three little pigs would do, but a hay bale covered in a thin layer of adobe is cheap, fairly lightweight, surprisingly fireproof, and being two or three feet thick, excellent insulation in a hot sunny climate. Even though it sounds like the kind of thing no one would ever have been foolish enough to try until the current green craze, it has been done quite successfully for centuries in what is now New Mexico. Without a steel frame, it doesn't really work for multistory buildings, but with a steel frame underneath it could probably work fine for skyscrapers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw-bale_construction

  • chevytexas 10/07/2009 9:46:00 PM

    I commend the article for at least showing us that this is no weak sister in development processes. I question, somehow, why it had to journey to SFO (architectural nirvana? I don't think so)for the selection process, so I'll re-read the article. That said, it's the usual silliness: they don't own the property, near City Hall or wherever. Can you visualize Chavez Properties, who have been regularly screwed out of "insider" development projects by Hillwood and others, giving this to the City? Don't think so; I wouldn't. Next: there is a lot of hoopla about housing what are sometimes seen as "transitional" occupants (read: housing for the homeless); again, the site is amidst a poster-child neighborhood that may have to decide very soon how democratic it wants to be. The fact that it is a parking lot surrounded by the shelters and even 508 Park do not veil its extreme value to for-profit developers. Finally --frankly-- what the hell's wrong with a deck-park over the MixMaster Canyon? That's what drove that end of Dallas into convenient dissolution so the Cedars could be divided into "right side" and "wrong side"--any reduction of the canyon barrier would cause property values to soar. Nice try, wrong location.

  • Catbird 10/01/2009 6:48:00 PM

    Just to be fair�what these guys are proposing can be built technically but it will never work without taxpayer funding for construction, maintenance and long term operational subsidies. The world�s fair type of �sustainable housing of the future� project rationale may be mildly interesting for a time but it will be seen as laughable after the Obama administration ends and cap and trade is repealed. The thing will ultimately become a non-functional government-run slum right next door to the landmark I.M. Pei city hall. For the money, I�d rather have the �Biosphere� in Oracle, Arizona, that Ed Bass built to prepare astronauts to survive on the Earth after the long prophesied nuclear holocaust. It�s a better aesthetic fit for Dallas than any of the entrants and I hear it�s for sale since the Bass family lost interest. Think of it this way: the LEED carbon off-sets produced by repurposing the Biosphere at a new location in Dallas instead of building new will make it far greener than any of the proposals. Just to be fair�

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy