Karen Zarsky in Austin, who began as a facilitator for Re:Vision Dallas and wound up submitting an entry that did not place among the finalists, looks 200 miles up the road and thinks the project can become a reality, but only if Greenan and Brown can negotiate City Hall, which has offered support but little else to this point. She points to the need for private-public partnerships and the dangers involved when negotiating daydreams with code inspectors.

"I hope this effort is not done in vain, but there are some very lofty objectives here, and there's a large amount of due diligence necessary," she says. "I sure hope it works, because it's imperative to put precedent-setting work on the ground, and Dallas is a great place to do it for all kinds of reasons."

Greenan says he wants to break ground by no later than January 2011, which seems like forever from now—yet another reason the nonbelievers hiss and giggle upon the mention of the project.

"But this just might be the right time to do it, because of the economic situation with our country and the political dialogue" concerning sustainable developments, Brown says. "It's the perfect storm. Folks think it's pie-in-the-sky, sure, but there is a lot of energy. We are getting things finalized. This is the next project. It's right there, ready to happen."

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
 
  • Will Warner 10/13/2009 9:28:00 AM

    I know building a wall of straw sounds like something only the first of the three little pigs would do, but a hay bale covered in a thin layer of adobe is cheap, fairly lightweight, surprisingly fireproof, and being two or three feet thick, excellent insulation in a hot sunny climate. Even though it sounds like the kind of thing no one would ever have been foolish enough to try until the current green craze, it has been done quite successfully for centuries in what is now New Mexico. Without a steel frame, it doesn't really work for multistory buildings, but with a steel frame underneath it could probably work fine for skyscrapers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw-bale_construction

  • chevytexas 10/07/2009 9:46:00 PM

    I commend the article for at least showing us that this is no weak sister in development processes. I question, somehow, why it had to journey to SFO (architectural nirvana? I don't think so)for the selection process, so I'll re-read the article. That said, it's the usual silliness: they don't own the property, near City Hall or wherever. Can you visualize Chavez Properties, who have been regularly screwed out of "insider" development projects by Hillwood and others, giving this to the City? Don't think so; I wouldn't. Next: there is a lot of hoopla about housing what are sometimes seen as "transitional" occupants (read: housing for the homeless); again, the site is amidst a poster-child neighborhood that may have to decide very soon how democratic it wants to be. The fact that it is a parking lot surrounded by the shelters and even 508 Park do not veil its extreme value to for-profit developers. Finally --frankly-- what the hell's wrong with a deck-park over the MixMaster Canyon? That's what drove that end of Dallas into convenient dissolution so the Cedars could be divided into "right side" and "wrong side"--any reduction of the canyon barrier would cause property values to soar. Nice try, wrong location.

  • Catbird 10/01/2009 6:48:00 PM

    Just to be fair�what these guys are proposing can be built technically but it will never work without taxpayer funding for construction, maintenance and long term operational subsidies. The world�s fair type of �sustainable housing of the future� project rationale may be mildly interesting for a time but it will be seen as laughable after the Obama administration ends and cap and trade is repealed. The thing will ultimately become a non-functional government-run slum right next door to the landmark I.M. Pei city hall. For the money, I�d rather have the �Biosphere� in Oracle, Arizona, that Ed Bass built to prepare astronauts to survive on the Earth after the long prophesied nuclear holocaust. It�s a better aesthetic fit for Dallas than any of the entrants and I hear it�s for sale since the Bass family lost interest. Think of it this way: the LEED carbon off-sets produced by repurposing the Biosphere at a new location in Dallas instead of building new will make it far greener than any of the proposals. Just to be fair�

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy