Counting DART's Light Rail in Heavy Traffic Leads to One Inescapable Conclusion: Downtown Gridlock

What am I doing here with a notebook, waiting for DART trains and being abused by people? I've been out here trainspotting for the last few days, and it's not much fun.

No need to hurry completion of the Routh Connector because, as you can see from this picture, cars are never going to be able to get through the trains anyway.
Jim Schutze
No need to hurry completion of the Routh Connector because, as you can see from this picture, cars are never going to be able to get through the trains anyway.

They made a movie about trainspotting, I know, but I think all the people in that movie were heroin addicts. Maybe that's the secret.

For my part, I am lurking around DART stations, systematically writing down the times when DART light rail trains come in. Or not.

A couple of times guys in suits coming off the trains see me standing here, and they start shaking their heads no as they pass. They think I'm some kind of panhandler or phone-card salesman or something!

Look, the timing of the DART trains through downtown is where suburban push comes to urban shove in this city. Dallas has always been dominated by its 'burbs. In the late 1970s, Dallas was still electing major suburban real estate developers as its mayors.

Mayor Robert Folsom ('77-'81) and Mayor Starke Taylor ('83-'87), in fact, were the two biggest independent suburban tract-home developers in the entire region. They devoted their tenures, not surprisingly, to ramming thoroughfares through inner-city neighborhoods in order to get more people out to the boonies faster, the best examples being the cross-town expressway and an infamous failed plot to double-deck Central Expressway.

For decades even when Dallas invested in downtown, the developments it favored tended to be monolithic, fascist-scale shopping mall projects like "Victory" at the American Airlines Center arena, instead of small-scale, diverse urban shop fronts, of which we still have precious few downtown.

But that's changing. Look around the borders of downtown—from Uptown to Henderson Avenue, the Design District to The Cedars—and you'll see dense thickets of development crowding in from the periphery, thriving on a lifestyle that is decidedly urban. It's so un-suburban, it's actually anti-suburban.

So, the trainspotting. On September 14, when DART opened service on a segment of its new Green Line from Carrollton to Pleasant Grove, all the trains in the entire region slowed to a near standstill, choked by a rail traffic jam in downtown. DART said it was just first-day jitters. Now, they say, everything is back to normal.

I say we won't see normal again for about seven years.

I wrote about this last July 23 ("Tracks of My Tears"), and also in April 2008, both times citing DART's own studies predicting havoc if all its new suburban rail lines wind up going through downtown before DART builds a second downtown rail alignment.

In fact, people knew about this when DART first began laying out its rail lines. It was pretty simple. If all of the regional rail lines have to connect through downtown Dallas by passing east and west on the one existing rail corridor on Pacific Avenue, then at some point there will be too many trains trying to get through the bottleneck.

DART promised to take care of the problem by signing a pact with the city almost 20 years ago agreeing to get a second reliever route built through downtown before hooking up its two new train routes—the Green Line and the Orange Line (from DFW Airport to downtown).

But that promise has continued to slip as the more aggressive (and smarter) suburban members of the DART board have pushed for money for line extensions into their own backyards.

Uh...the trainspotting. Getting to it.

I am out here two days before the lightbulb comes on. At first I think DART is doing the impossible—shoehorning all its regular traffic on the existing Red and Blue Lines through downtown, sticking fairly close to schedules, also managing to get the new Green Line trains up and down Pacific without too much disruption.

But I have been timing the wrong thing. I am looking at how often each train shows up—the gaps between trains. Does a train show up every five minutes if a train is scheduled to show up every five minutes?

Kinda sorta. But that's the wrong thing to look at. I should have been looking at when they show up precisely. How close to their schedules are they?

Not at all. They're all over the map. A train that's supposed to be here at 7:26 shows up at 7:30. Train scheduled for 7:34 shows up at 7:32.

So what possible difference does that make? You can wait an extra minute or two.

But the difference is downtown. What I am really looking at is one giant traffic implosion getting ready to happen downtown in December 2011. That's when the final branch of the system, the Orange Line from DFW, comes on line. Here's the deal.

The trains go up and down Pacific Avenue. Cars go back and forth across Pacific Avenue. If cars can't cross Pacific, vehicular traffic can't cross downtown, especially since our city council in its stupefying un-wisdom has agreed to a pernicious scheme called "signal prioritization."

DART trains drive on the streets downtown. They have to stop for red lights just like cars. Or they did. Now with signal prioritization the driver of a DART train can push a button and turn the light ahead of him green.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Casie Pierce 10/15/2009 1:52:00 AM

    Jeff, those Green Line trains will be at capacity the first week they're online. Mesquite isn't in DART but that doesn't mean their residents won't use the line. Scyene is a highway and it will lead many from North of 635 to the Lawnview Station to park and ride into town. It's why the parking lot has 500 spaces and property to build 400 more if needed. I don't understand why residents of Lakweood and East Dallas wouldn't think to park (or walk, I'm mot sure which part of East Dallas you're referring to) at the Baylor station and ride into downtown to work.

  • Jeff 10/13/2009 8:34:00 PM

    I'd love to see a follow-up story covering cars coming in to downtown from Lakewood and East Dallas on Live Oak between 8a and 9a on weekdays. The (empty) green line trains crossing there have traffic backed up forever. To make matters worse, people turning right off of Live Oak must then cross the tracks again. These trains have added 5-10 minutes to these drivers' commute. And for what? Empty green-line trains?

  • Madmax 10/13/2009 5:52:00 AM

    I see your point. The only answer I have it to park that car you took to watch the train's and hop abord! My only complaint is I requested my employer sponsored pass 9 weeks ago and DART had yet to process my application! Riding the Rail!

  • richard schumacher 10/12/2009 8:19:00 PM

    Brandon, thanks for the correction on number of trains. I'd thought that the Orange Line would bring the number of trains to 60 per hour at peak. But remaining at "only" 48 per hour is no argument against a second downtown line. A second line is needed for redundancy at least. Even now an interruption of downtown rail would be a nightmare.

  • Daphne Scarbrough 10/12/2009 12:39:00 AM

    I was fortunate to be able to attend the national Public, Private, Partnership Conference held in Dallas last fall. I had lunch with most of your Dallas Dart board members and chairman. Nice people, shocked to have someone from Houston there with them. There is something that happens to the thinking of intelligent people when they are placed on non-profit and city boards, all logic goes out the window. From what we have studied in Houston, light rail creates traffic congestion and you have only reinforced that. Thank you for going through such an arduous, boring task of counting trains. How many red lights do your trains run? Ours do it all the time in Houston. Very dangerous.

  • Branden Helms 10/10/2009 2:29:00 AM

    Jim, sigh, another off the mark column on rail planning. Too bad the trial is over. Your skills were appreciated there. 1) What's with the contradiction in celebrating urban walkability in other stories, but bashing transit because it interferes with cars? Cars are the antithesis of urbanity. Cars = L.A. People and trains = New York. Several urban developers you praise love congestion in the mixed-use projects, including in the downtown area. Dallas has it backwards when it comes to downtown, cars are first. Getting people out of downtown matters more than what they do when they are here. If Pearl Street were better timed for trains instead of cars, the scheduling issues, which are mostly resolved as it is now, are just about completely removed. When the level boarding project is complete for all lines, it will be a rarity even further. 2)Speaking of congestion, where is it? The wall of trains blocking traffic that you predicted earlier has yet to appear. Of course, had you listened to my comment on your story from July 23rd, you would know why that was unfounded. The addition of the Orange Line will be minimal, and here's why. If you look at the train schedule for peak hours and peak direction, apparently the armageddon time for congestion, there are six Green Line, six Blue Line and 12 Red Line trains. Or in other words, we are near the 1990 interlocal agreement for downtown routing, which is the predetermined capacity level, but only for peak direction. Each line has six in non-peak direction. Now you say adding the Orange Line will exceed this by adding six more trains, right? Not so fast. If you peruse the Environmental Impact Statement for the Orange Line, you will see routing up the Central Corridor, to LBJ/Central Station if I recall correctly. Page 3 of this PDF, http://www.dart.org/about/expansion/noiorangelinedfw.pdf, states it will run to Parker Road in peak hour times. This is important because the 6,6,12 currently turns into 6,6,6,6 with the Orange in peak direction. The only addition comes from 6 additional trains in non-peak direction, which has been free flowing at this point. Let me introduce another conflicting position. You say Dallas is a pushover to suburban interests. Yet you want free flowing streets for cars downtown. A greater percentage of train riders are Dallas residents and a greater percentage of cars users are suburban. 3)Speaking of Dallas v suburbs, you claim downtown routing sucks because we have built trains to the burbs instead. About half of the DART sales tax comes from the burbs and half from Dallas. Plano has two light rail stations, Richardson has four and Garland has two. Addison, Carrollton, Cockrell Hill, Farmers Branch, Glenn Heights, Highland Park, Irving, Rowlett and University Park have none. The Park Cities are near Mockingbird and Lovers Stations and Irving does have two TRE stations, but Dallas has the remainder of the 31 LRT stations. With phase two of the Green Line, Carrollton and Farmers Branch will get four total, Dallas will get 11 more. It's not like they are getting the short end of the stick. Even downtown has more stations than any single suburban member. You state the suburban board members were smart in getting rail lines built into their backyard, presumably over the priorities of bumbling Dallas. All the rail lines that are getting built today and have been built already were on the plan presented to voters in 1983. There is no new line sneaking into suburban areas. The only thing that has changed are the opening dates. The original plan called for all lines to be built at once, with Dallas getting the first opening date of all the lines. That had to be modified when a bond vote failed in 1989. That led to the interlocal agreement that capped the transit mall at 48 trains per hour. It also made completing each line in its entirety more practical, rather than starting them all at once. Note that DART will not violate the cap of 48 trains an hour when the Orange Line is opened in 2011 and extended in 2012 and 2013. It will not be violated when the Blue Line is extended in both directions, starting in 2012. The agreement does not state that as soon as 48 trains are met, a new line must open immediately. Should DART choose to do so, they could never open another downtown line, so long as 48 trains are never exceeded. If they want to run a 49th train into downtown, a new line will then be needed. You've been too quiet on the Trinity front lately. Perhaps a trip is needed out that way, rather than to the rail line downtown.

  • richard schumacher 10/09/2009 9:36:00 PM

    There are no circle lines here now because nobody wanted to pay for them. Many people had to see LRT first hand before appreciating their utility. It may not be strictly necessary for the Orange Line to go through downtown, but that is the official plan because people don't like transfers. Adding Orange Line trains will push the existing capacity right to the brink with no margin for errors. Commenter Jim, Author Jim's math was correct: (48 trains)/(60 minutes) = 0.8 trains per minute, which is equivalent to (60 minutes/48 trains) = 1.25 minutes per train, not 0.8 minutes per train. Be careful with units.

  • JamieDFW 10/09/2009 3:27:00 PM

    "There's no button for the train operator to push to get a green light or otherwise override traffic signals" Why not? The Fort Worth T already has this on the 2/2E East Lancaster bus route. Wouldn't this help?

  • Ken Duble 10/09/2009 6:11:00 AM

    As always, Jim, your insights are fresh and very much appreciated. Trouble is, your story is about 3 weeks out of date. There were delays and snarls initially, but by the second week, the red and blue lines were on schedule. I know. I depend on the train to get to and from work every day. The scheduling is a good as it has ever been. As for signal prioritization, why wouldn't the council approve this? No city on earth with a progressive view toward transportation fails to prioritize public transit over cars, most of which have single occupants. In fact, I live downtown, and I'm not seeing these Pacific traffic jams you're predicting. Not that I'm surprised. Motorists adapt quickly to such challenges, and learn alternate routes. Isn't that much of the point of having a car, to be able to navigate around traffic snarls? As for the orange line, I fail to share your worry. After all, the orange isn't a thru line like the other three. So there isn't any need to bring it down Pacific at all. It could terminate at AAC just as easily as Pearl. Riders could take another line to AAC and change, so there is no reason it couldn't stop there for the time being, at least until DART decides whether to branch off a Pleasant Grove line east over Loop 12. In a larger sense, though, when did you come to be so worried for the interests of motorists driving downtown? This contradicts your celebration of walk able urban ethos. The drawback to DART's political culture, as I see it, is the lack of circle lines. Why should a rail rider traveling from downtown Plano to downtown Garland have to go through Mockingbird Station to get there? Why should a rail rider going to the VA Hospital from Buckner have to go through downtown? Why should a commuter who lives in Pleasant Grove but works in Garland have to go through downtown? Why can't rail have circular routes like Etoile-Nation in Paris, or the Yellow Line in London? This is what you ought to be writing about.

  • Jim 10/08/2009 10:49:00 PM

    Jim, your math is incorrect. 48 trains in 60 minutes would be one train per 0.8 minutes (48 seconds).

  • Brandon 10/08/2009 10:28:00 PM

    if train A leaves Baylor heading downtown and Train B leaves Mockingbird at the same time traveling the same speed, which train will get through Downtown first? Answer: no tellin'.

  • gogoplata2ya 10/08/2009 9:54:00 PM

    WHAT! THE GOVERNMENT LIED WHAT! TRAINS NOT RUNNING ON TIME WHAT! THEY WANT MORE MONEY hahahhahaah

  • JimS 10/08/2009 8:33:00 PM

    Jim Schutze here, owning up to a mistake in this column. I misinterpreted information I had been given to the effect that the trains are entirely driver-operated. I thought this included the signal prioritization system. Morgan Lyons of DART has informed me I was/am wrong. Here is what Mr. Lyons told me: "There's no button for the train operator to push to get a green light or otherwise override traffic signals. The signals are timed and the operators have a countdown in their cabs telling them when the light will change. This helps get them ready to move the train into position so its going through the intersection as quickly as possible."

  • Tim Covington 10/08/2009 4:52:00 PM

    This a classic case of prioritization. Do you want to prioritize cars or trains. Since one of Dallas' stated goals is moving people out of cars, it makes sense to prioritize trains.

  • ajw 10/08/2009 2:21:00 AM

    Trains will run like a Swiss watch until that first commuter sticks his hand in the closing door and delays everyone on board. Or there's a power outage. Or a track fire. Or a guy trying to run from the cops by hopping the train. Or the motorman is too light on the gas or a leadfoot with the brake. Or a train door gets stuck a Mockingbird Station. Schedule all you want, there is no way trains A & B cross Akard at the same scheduled time except by accident.

  • richard schumacher 10/08/2009 1:06:00 AM

    Bad as the situation will be already, the geniuses in Dallas city hall want to delay resolution by a further two years while they look for funding to route the 2nd downtown line next to the convention center hotel. Along with the delay that means another $300 million that the region will not have available to pay for more worthy projects. The only sensible and affordable route on the table is along Young and under Lamar. Contact your DART board member; Dallas residents also contact the mayor and your councilperson. Tell them to forget that convention center route nonsense and do the right thing. http://www.dart.org/about/board/boardbios/boardbios.asp http://www.dallascityhall.com/government/government.html

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy