Dallas Has A Dirty Secret: It Acts As If Supports the Community Gardens Movement, But That's Not the Real Truth.

It never occurred to Jan Worthington, an East Dallas yoga instructor, that her idea for a community garden could be controversial. "I simply wanted a fresh tomato," she remembers.

Now she knows.

Worthington and a group of eager would-be gardeners wanted to build long rows of raised garden beds—wooden boxes filled with plant-friendly soil—on a small portion of a grassy 10-acre piece of property owned by the city of Dallas near White Rock Lake.

The group planned to use an architect and a garden consultant to make sure its garden would fit in well with the woodsy residential neighborhood around it. Some of the raised beds would have produced low-growing, bushy crops like lima beans, peppers and eggplants. Others would have grown dense-green jungles of trellis-trained cucumbers, tomatoes, green beans, loofah gourds and what-have-you. Winding between would have been walkways paved with wood chips.

But the whole idea ran into a brick wall at City Hall. After much sturm und drang and spinning of wheels, city officials finally told Worthington it couldn't be done.

In general, City Hall's position on community gardens amounts to saying it's just not ready for them. It wants the gardeners to wait until it can accomplish a lengthy process of study and budgeting.

Enthusiasm for community gardens is so great, not just here but nationally, that the city winds up looking like a traffic cop furiously tweeting on his whistle in the middle of eight lanes of freeway traffic. Not surprising, determined gardeners are finding their own way around.

Local garden experts say that folks in this city, like other places across the country, are bursting with energy and passion for homegrown veggies. It's a trend that crosses class and economic lines but with different motivations.

For Kim Haley, who tried to organize a community garden in an affluent East Dallas neighborhood, it's all about kids and healthy eating. She says, "I have noticed that if you give a kid a bell pepper to eat, they'll turn their nose up at it. But if you take it off the vine, they'll eat it.

"Just seeing the magic of that—that all of a sudden my kids are eating green beans by the handful, and parsley and tomatoes—and with the problems we have with obesity and inactivity—I really want my children to grow up knowing where food comes from and not thinking it comes in a box."

For Becky Smith, who runs a community garden in a more modest neighborhood in southeast Dallas, growing food by hand has a lot to do with need: "We have families who are here because they struggle to put food on the table."

Whatever the source of their enthusiasm, City Hall wishes community gardeners would put a lid on it, at least for now. Worthington, the yoga instructor, was seemingly welcomed with open arms at first by city staff, then suddenly spurned. She is one of a number of would-be community gardeners who say their efforts have been foiled by someone at City Hall, often described by them as an invisible foe.

In truth, their foe is not invisible—just not eager for publicity. We will name him here shortly. And the foe has his reasons.

Being a government, the city naturally assumes it must find a way to regulate community gardens and then come up with tax money to pay for the regulating. But the gardeners don't understand how growing beans can possibly require all that much regulation.

In its reluctance, Dallas may be a little backward compared with Boston or Chicago, but it's hardly the Lone Ranger, according to national community garden experts. Cities everywhere are having trouble keeping pace with the surge of interest in community gardens, and private garden advocacy groups say interest has become so great in just the last year that they barely have time to man their own phones.

The trend does not look like it will melt away soon. A January 2009 survey paid for by Monsanto and published by the National Garden Association found that 31 percent of all U.S. households—36 million in all—participated in some form of food gardening in 2008. The study revealed that 7 million more households will raise garden food in 2009—a jump of 19 percent, more than twice the rate of increase for the previous year.

An important topic of conversation at the national convention of the American Community Garden Association held in Columbus, Ohio, in August, was the degree to which public enthusiasm has dwarfed local resources all over the country. ACGA President Bobby Wilson told the Observer, "There is so much demand on local programs across the country that they cannot keep up with it."

Given the national picture, perhaps some slack should be cut for City Hall in Dallas if it can't keep up either. But City Hall has failed to explain the problem to community garden enthusiasts, leaving them to puzzle it out for themselves. And that has led to some understandable gardening paranoia.

Some people even speculate there's a secret anti-organic conspiracy afoot, funded by Big Chemicals. Kim Haley has pondered the possibility of an unspoken agenda harbored by someone in authority taking issue with her group's commitment to organic techniques or maybe even its association with Howard Garrett, the Dallas-based national organics guru who is persona non grata to the chemical industry and Texas A&M University.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Betty Priesing 10/24/2009 5:58:00 AM

    I think all of the City Council should be voted off. Also the school board needs new faces. There should be a 4 year limit on all. Dallas is the laughing stock of the United States large cities. Everyone is always fighting.

  • Dick Richardson 10/18/2009 10:27:00 PM

    Howard is a friend of years, and it's good to see him influencing the mainstream of the city. We have a raised bed garden in our front yard, less than 20 blocks easy walk from UT-Austin. We eat regularly from it, and local kids are introduced to eating vegetables -- right off the plant. Several neighbors have gardens. Our entire yard is "organic" and the pecan trees in the back yard also produce nuts we crack and shell as we watch TV or DVDs. Even some UT students are interested in gardening. They got diverted a bit by focus on "native plants" instead of "edible native plants", but they will be exploring many ideas. It's not quite like Dairy Queen at the garden, but the campus cafeterias compost their leftovers. Of course, Austin is "weird" and has never, far as I know, considered gardens "illegal". That's a tasty way to be weird.

  • Carol Thompson 10/17/2009 5:37:00 PM

    The City of Dallas has, for decades, taken "more time to study . . . " situations of vital interest to residents, then, moved on to hire an outside consultants who did a fair job but identified results that fell short of the actual answers - they were not wrong, only short-sighted. Now, here it is again, community gardens in question! Perhaps the present leadership should travel a bit, and absorb all the gardening activity elsewhere, on rooftops of apartments buildings, in vacant lots, medians, alleyways, etc. then return home and help this critically needed movement along. Gardening to feed the populace has had an extremely long clinical trial, folks!

  • Meredith 10/17/2009 3:39:00 PM

    Incredibly informative and insightful article--esp. interesting to me as a person who would love to see community gardening take off in Fort Worth. City officials MUST develop whatever policies they need to and QUICK because the push for community gardens is only going to get stronger--not go away. Kudos to Becky Smith, Don Lambert, Howard Garrett, and others who are such great advocates for community gardens! Thanks, Observer, for this article and support of the community gardening movement!

  • Gerald Simpkins 10/17/2009 2:02:00 PM

    I read this piece with interest. As an outsider to Dallas, the names and locations mean nothing to me. Neither do the various offices and departments. The things that jumped out at me is (1) The "roadblock" is always Mr Dyer. (2) The company that paid for the community garden survey is Monsanto. Has anyone ever considered that Mr Dyer might have a little too cozy a relationship with Monsanto? Before you dismiss that as some loony conspiracy theory, take a step back and look at what Monsanto's greatest budgetary expense is. It is genetically modified organisms (called GMO's) Their whole corporate future is staked on the success and worldwide dissemination of their own hybrid seeds. In Iraq, the only seeds farmers can get are Monsanto hybrids and they must buy them year by year because unlike natural seeds, they cannot reproduce themselves from the crop itself. If these community gardens catch on nationwide, Monsanto will eventually feel the pinch as people switch from GMO 'frankenfoods' to real, whole foods properly grown with no pesticides or harsh chemical mineral-deficient fertilizers added. And worse yet for Monsanto, these foods could be reproduced year after year from anybody's seeds that they saved from the harvest. Now add the stunning successes of so many community gardens to internet communications and you might just have a worldwide problem for Monsanto. I would be willing to venture that if Mr Dyer does have a 'special' relationship with someone at Monsanto, he is not alone in this. It may well be that his counterparts are found in other large American cities wherever hostility towards community gardening is found. The question could be answered by investigating where campaign funding comes from. Then again, Mr Dyer may be innocent in all of this and just may be another bureaucratic grinch that has outlived any useful service he may have once had to offer the City of Dallas. He may be simply a stuck-in-the-mud dinosaur who's time has passed.

  • Donaldo Ellisoni 10/16/2009 8:59:00 PM

    Jim, you again have a great article, especially including all the positive forces like Garrett, Lambert, et al. Lambert's suggestion about concentrating on private land and leaving the "government" out of it is the direction to go, I would agree. As another suggestion, and Kim was very close to it with one of her borders being a railroad: Yes, railroad rights of way! There are miles, acres of this private land, unused except for the occasional access road or crossing. In The Netherlands, the railroads turn over all their rights of way to local Dutch "gardeners" to grow vegetables, flowers, or whatever. As a result, the rights of way are a thing of beauty as you travel along. (Yes, poeople do travel by rail in The Neterlands!) As you have suggested, Jim, at the end of your article, the positive forces need to find a way around the road-blocks and government red tape, i.e., leave them out. However, If you do want to involve the nay-sayers in some way, though I'd recommend against it, tell them that Ft. Worth already has gardens!

  • fx1 10/14/2009 7:30:00 PM

    good job city of dallas, i agree with the city on this issue, and as for those that want a fresh tomato there is a hole great big farmers market that would deffently love to help you out with that, sounds like to me all you would have is a homeless person free snack bar

  • Km Koesler 10/14/2009 2:35:00 PM

    To Quote II , "Also, a vote for highway property. I have gardened the highway right of way for about 15 years." Aren't you concerned about heavy metals running off from the road and contaminating your produce. I've been reading for years not to harvest from right-of-ways and roadsides due to lead contamination and other auto exhaust chemical contaminates.

  • LMM 10/14/2009 3:08:00 AM

    I am, by no stretch of the imagination, an expert on city law and regulations, but if there's no definition of a community garden in the zoning regulations, and if there is no specific law or regulation prohibiting a community garden, then it seems to me that it ought to be legal.

  • hk williams 10/13/2009 10:08:00 PM

    Folks, You article assumes or has the expectation that politicians in Dallas or anywhere else actually care enough to attempt to figure out what is best for its citicens. Look no further than the $1Billion spent in Arlington for a new stadium and you will see the IQ of the politicians in Dallas. I think a pre-requisite for holding office is you should have to pass an IQ test and score above IDIOT. This would eliminate the majority of those holding any office today. Eliminate 50% of Government - E50G

  • interestedneighbor 10/12/2009 6:32:00 AM

    Wrong Friendo, Live in the surrounding neighbor. You sure make a compelling argument with your know it all attitude and open checkbook, quite impressive. Since I have not called the city to oppose this so called grass roots effort by 60 people then I am certainly compelled to now. By the way, if you want to be a farmer try Red Oak. Yall come back now ya hear.

  • Casie Pierce 10/11/2009 7:27:00 PM

    Here's the thing that bugs me, because my non-profit, grassroots organization, has a similar problem: a group of people get together and organize collectively in the neighborhood, for whatever project, and one or two people who either did not "hear about it" or were skeptical of it, decide that they don't like or agree with whatever grassroots project their neighbors tried to organize, so they go to the Park Board and complain. And the reaction from the Park Board and staff??? To shut down the project because they can't handle a little criticism from disagreeable neighbors, sometime people who don't even live near the project at hand, but who just want to complain at every turn. The City capitulates to one complaining neighbor vs. a whole neighborhood of grassroots organizers with their checkbooks open and ready to pay for the project... This article admits that it happens! I'd like to know who this poster "interestedneighbor" is and where he lives with his "Git Offa My Lawn" attitude. 10 bucks says he doesn't even live near Kim's proposed garden.

  • interestedneighbor 10/11/2009 3:48:00 PM

    Wow, sounds great. Interestingly I've heard nothing about this until now and live close to the 'city park' that is being discussed. Seems the 'gardeners' would have asked the surrounding neighbors for their support. Yes, the property has not been used for 70 years. And what is wrong with that? The city allows the natural grassland to grow as much as possible to leave the 'natural' look. Why is it that people blame the city for not doing anything with the park/land are the same people who complain that the city will not let them do anything with it? Leave well enough alone.

  • samuel beaux 10/11/2009 2:41:00 AM

    dear Jim Schutze ... SPELLCHECK!!! U Dumd MudrFkr!

  • eastdallaguy 10/09/2009 9:15:00 PM

    Great article! Hopefully, the article will spur along the current efforts to get community gardens "legal". The East Dallas Garden mentioned in the article has been "illegal" since it started and remains so today. When the City attempted to close it some years back, the public outcry was loud enough to prevent it from happening. Don Lambert is, indeed, the dean of community gardens because of his knowledge and tenure. Unfortunately, he has been part of the problem when it comes to relations with the City. The good news is that there are new emerging voices of reason within and outside of the City that are finally getting things moving.

  • JimS 10/09/2009 8:28:00 PM

    Jim Schutze here, with a correction. Don Lambert wrote me yesterday to say the following: "Overall a very good piece on community gardens. One small problem, is that, I have never been an employee of the city of Dallas. I worked for the Dallas Civic Garden Center (currently known as The Texas Discovery Garden), which is a nonprofit that manages its program at a city owned facility in Fair Park. The community gardening program I coordinated at the Garden Center was funded from a Meadows Foundation grant." My apologies, Don. I got it wrong.

  • ll 10/09/2009 7:13:00 PM

    The answer is simply to do it and not ask permission. The City is so inefficient that by the time they figure it out, you will have harvested your second crop. Also, a vote for highway property. I have gardened the highway right of way for about 15 years. They mow around me and haven't bothered me at all. I now have full grown fruit trees out there. Also, I have planted fruit trees in the park and in the parkway. With all the vacant lots in Southern Dallas and the lack of grocery stores, it is a no brainer.

  • worm rancher 10/09/2009 4:59:00 PM

    Steve, I agree EVERY Council person and city staffer are not the problem--there are some real supporters and shining stars. However, the most recent "pay to develop" trial surrounding a council person and appointees leads me to think that not every person at 1500 Marilla Street believes they work for the residential taxpayer. Also, haven't they had enough time? This issue has been around for 20 years. Again, if we were Big Business, that code would be altered and they would find a way to make it happen. Unfortunately, we are just citizens.

  • worm rancher 10/09/2009 4:31:00 PM

    Cognitive Dissonance is a common theme in the Dallas City Hall Psyche. The frustrating part of several Dallas Code issues (like community gardens, local Farmer's Markets, etc.)is the seeming lack of problem solving, inconsistent communication of "the code/law/enforcement",and the lack of concern for the wants and desires of Joe/Jane Public. 20 years with no definition of what a 'Community Garden" is? 20 years of the same code with a requirement of an already standing building? If we were(insert any insidious Big Box Store here), the staff/council would be slobbering all over us to immediately change the code, destroy an urban forest, re-route natural creeks, pave over wildlife habitat, etc. to immediately serve our needs. Mr. Lambert's assertion that City government is concened about "grassroots community organizing" as trouble sometimes seems to be the real perception, when it feels the Council/Staff bends over backwards for outside Corporate interests, but gives the voting populace the runaround. Ironic that our Mayor, Tom Leppert, was in Seattle just last week to learn strategies from other cities about the "important topics" of the environment and obesity. Seems your own citizens have been desperately trying to teach City Hall that in their own backyards. Goes back to the title of the article: Dallas Has A Dirty Secret: It Acts As If Supports the Community Gardens Movement, But That's Not the Real Truth Lot's of saying the right thing, knowing all the while it is "horse compost".

  • Steven Clary 10/09/2009 3:55:00 PM

    Elected officials aren't the problem. In fact, they are the solution but it's going to take time.

  • A.L. Nickerson 10/09/2009 2:37:00 PM

    I have been a volunteer in community gardening for several years. I also founded the Lake Highlands Community Garden. I sincerly believe that Jill Jordan, Eric Griffin, Laura Fiffick and Jerry Allen have done everything within their power to open Dallas for community gardening. I learned almost everything I know about community gardening from Don Lambert. Don and his Gardeners in Community Development organization has done more to feed hungry people in Dallas than any other "grass roots" organization in our city. Nancy is 100% correct that the city has never had any apreciation for his efforts and truthfully has done everything within their power to shut him down. While the focus of this article is on community gardening, there are a lot of other issues where the city seems to be fighting hard to maintain the staus quo. Why can't we do more to insure that we have clean air and clean water for the future. Other cities are looking past traditional wisdom to rethink and reinvent how they approach environmental issues. Why can't Dallas? As a child, I remember hearing R.L. Thornton speak about the greatness of Dallas and how our future would be incredible because of our "can do attitude." I wonder what ever happened to that attitude?

  • Farm Lover 10/09/2009 5:47:00 AM

    Dallas owns an entire Farm! - Samuel Farm - Yet they don't grow anything out there anymore except ruts.

  • schrodie 10/09/2009 1:19:00 AM

    "...milk and eggs DON'T come out of a bottle or a carton." Sorry for the typo

  • schrodie 10/09/2009 1:16:00 AM

    You mean vegetables DON'T come out of a box or a bag? Shocking!! Next thing you'll tell me is that milk and eggs doesn't come out of a bottle or a carton...

  • Carla R. Springer 10/09/2009 12:44:00 AM

    Just another example of the red tape and bureaucracy that drove me out of homeownership in Dallas. The motivation of doing something good for the community wilts in the face of the City's mission to have power over every inch of public and private land. Certainly feeding hungry people and drawing communities closer together are more important than writing rules and regulations, hiring city inspectors and levying fines, etc. in Dallas. The City of Plano and Junior League have worked together for years on a community garden without all the pathos that seems to happen in the City of Dallas.

  • chevytexas 10/08/2009 11:49:00 PM

    If Code Compliance can't generate compliance violations as a means of generating revenue (fines=fees), their new mantra, they won't support it and will actively work against it. If there was a City Fee for gardening, they'd be all for it.

  • colinnwn 10/08/2009 11:43:00 PM

    It is so very embarrassing how backwards our Dallas city leaders are. Has anyone done research into the organizational history and development of city and county politics and politicians, to see why they do their job so poorly, compared to other cities that seem to work so well?

  • gogoplat2ya 10/08/2009 9:48:00 PM

    Anything that could interfer with government collecting taxes is the reason from the Farmers Market or the Local Tom thumb etc grow them in your own yard and never trust a socialist

  • jaime 10/08/2009 9:14:00 PM

    another reason why i love the dallas observer. thank you for (again) bringing to light the absolute idiocy of elected officials. so many children (as mentioned in the article) don't have any idea where their food comes from. they don't eat vegetables unless it's on a mcdonald's burger. this is both disturbing and disgusting, yet dallas turns a deaf ear. what is wrong with growing some frickin' tomatoes??????

  • Donna Turman 10/08/2009 8:21:00 PM

    If it involved pouring concrete over that same land, the city would have no problem. Dallas City Hall seems to be allergic to nature. Part of this I think comes from a natural tendency to be obstructive but another part of it I think is to keep the land ready and available for the next chain that wants to build a parking lot on it.

  • Marsha Bills 10/08/2009 5:43:00 PM

    Thanks to Jim Schutze for exposing, once again, the ultimate power of Big Money (Big Chemicals, Big Medicine, Big fill-in-the-blank) and its ability to block even the most benign and benificial activities in our communities to control what we literally put into our homes and families. Better city gardens are at worst overgrown with neglected tomato vines than littered with empty malt liquor bottles. Geez. I hope every citizen who cares not only about healthy and economical eating but also about forthright politicians (I know, it's an oxymoron), will join me in sending a a strong message to every elected official at city hall that we demand a right to the most basic and best use of city-owned land to benefit those who live here, pay taxes and elect them.

  • Nancy 10/08/2009 5:37:00 PM

    Dallas needs to come into the twenty-first century. It missed the twentieth, and we are almost ten years into the twenty-first. Nationally, community gardens have been successful across the nation for years. I'm sure there are failures and problems, just as there are failures any where you want to look. The Dallas city government has apathy, no motive, and no interest. They have excuses. Truly, it is embarrassing, when it could be something to be proud of. The federal government gives grants to gardens in place. Is that not an indication of interest and success? Other cities are getting the money, because of the work they have already done. No legal regulations covering community gardens? In twenty years? How long does it take? Will it ever hapopen? When? Go back to what Don Lambert said. He has gone on without the city of Dallas and is respected for the work he has done. This has been at great sacrifice to himeself and his family. Yes, Dallasites need to be encouraged and educated as to how to grow some of their own food. All of these resources willing to help them, and the city has turned their back on them. Shame on them. Again. You'll actually fine that recycling and gardening make great partners. Dallas again is over twenty years behind in recycling. Why?

  • VFW American 10/08/2009 1:51:00 PM

    This is what Dallas City leaders do on a consistant bases. They want to spend more money on studies and build Parks in a Yearly Flood Plain so as to spend more money to repair it every year. I have lived in Dallas my entire life and have never been so disapointed in the direction these uneducated leaders are taking our city. Something that would bring people together is what these leaders were voted in to do. WAKE UP DALLAS/GET THE VOTE OUT

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy