What Don Hill's Conviction Means for Dallas

This terrible City Hall corruption trial we just went through—11 people either found guilty of federal crimes or pleading guilty to them—wasn't about black Dallas. It was about Dallas. To see the real story, try to focus on this one small chapter. This little play within the play, about events that transpired six years ago, tells the tale.

According to sworn testimony in the three-month-long trial, two top Dallas political consultants were trying in 2003 to get support for their client, Bill Fisher, from the late James Fantroy, a city council member. Fisher wanted to build government-supported affordable housing in Fantroy's district.

The real game for Fisher was to win lucrative tax credits awarded by the state as an incentive for building this type of housing—credits worth tens of millions of dollars that made affordable housing more affordable to developers. But the state would not award the credits unless local officials gave their blessing—a wrinkle adopted by the Legislature after some communities said they didn't want this type of housing.

At Dallas City Hall, the behind-the-scenes understanding was that these tax credit deals were the sole province of city council members in whose districts they were proposed. So if a city council member gave someone like Fisher a thumbs-down, Fisher was out of luck in that district. If he got a thumbs-up, millions of dollars flowed into his pocket.

The thumb was worth a lot of money. Some council members were selling the thumb. That's why we have 11 guilty verdicts and pleas in the City Hall corruption case.

In the Dallas way of doing things, Fisher hired two consultants—a white one to handle white people on the council and a black one to handle persons of color. The white one, Carol Reed, today is the chief fund-raiser and political advisor to Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert.

Reed runs the white side of all the big political campaigns in Dallas—bond projects, Trinity River project, convention center hotel—usually backed by the Dallas Citizens Council, an elite business group with roots deep in the city's troubled past.

The black consultant, Kathy Nealy, is a nationally active political lobbyist, best known here as a representative of the Perot family interests and for being Reed's chief operative in black southern Dallas on many major campaigns.

Reed and Nealy were to get city council approval for Fisher's projects. Nealy had the important job of winning Fantroy's support.

Fantroy was elected to the council in District 8 in far southeastern Dallas in 2000, the same year his political mentor, former councilman Al Lipscomb, was convicted on all 65 counts in a federal bribery indictment. Fantroy died last year of kidney cancer after serving time in prison for stealing $20,000 from the city's impoverished black college, Paul Quinn.

I dredge through all of this unpleasant detail for a reason. It's important to know what kind of world Bill Fisher was paying his emissaries, Reed and Nealy, to enter and do business in.

This would all be simple if it were a story about Reed and Nealy tricking good people into doing bad things. But that would be a very naïve take. As a matter of fact, I have talked to Reed for decades and have never once known her to tell me anything but the truth. I don't know Nealy as well, but am aware that she is respected at high levels nationally, up to and including past White House regimes.

They are two very smart, hard-knuckled women with their own brand of street-wise integrity, sent to do business in a swamp, often by men who don't have the balls to go there themselves.

Fantroy ran for office in 2000 on a pledge to defend his district from new multifamily housing developments. District 8 voters wanted new single-family residential development. But in 2003 when Nealy brought Fisher and his partner in to see him at Dallas City Hall, Fantroy, who owned a small security guard company, was ready to do some typical City Hall business.

Nealy testified at trial that Fantroy told her to have her clients step into the corridor—but she should stay behind. When they were alone, Fantroy told her he wanted her clients to give his company contracts for security work at the housing developments they wanted to build in his district. The deal included a $5,000 signing bonus for Fantroy and $160,000 worth of work for his struggling security company.

But here we come to a turning point in the saga. During a September 24, 2003, meeting of the Dallas City Council, then-Mayor Laura Miller learned of the security guard contract deal. And she went ballistic.

Miller insisted the council go into executive session to talk about the contracts. The rest of the council and the city attorney decided the contract deal was acceptable. Miller, still furious, contacted Sarah Dodd, then a KTVT-Channel 11 news reporter, and told her the part of the contracts story that had occurred in the public meeting.

According to testimony and to people close to the government's case, Dodd's story was how the FBI caught wind of the problems at City Hall. It's why the FBI launched its investigation. (By the way, we can officially retire the myth that Miller never got anything big done in her years as a council member and mayor.)

1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page >>
 
  • Celebrate Divershitty 11/10/2009 9:40:00 PM

    Celebrate divershitty, white-guilt liberals! Blacks and latrinos commit at least 85% of the rapes and murders in Dallas, but don't let a FACT (proven by local news and police reports) like that ruin your day of feeling terrible for being white and "smart".

  • Debra Almaguer 10/21/2009 2:08:00 PM

    I liked your article and it explained the trail of actions at City Hall. Mayor Leppert has a hard road ahead of him in updating his Ethics policy. The article in the Dallas Morning News reflects that change (10-20-09 paper). From the article, I got the feeling, his Council members are more of the "same old ways" and not interested in what's best for their districts or the city. Your article was very informative. Thank you

  • B 10/21/2009 3:33:00 AM

    AAF - the attitude of "paying off" what you call "gatekeepers" is why people do NOT want to invest in south Dallas. "Gatekeepers" - the likes of Hill, Price, West and their cronies - a select few - were or are profiting greatly from their shakedowns while the regular citizens are gaining nothing. The shakedown of the Allen group jeopardized the entire project - putting thousands of local jobs at risk. The Allen Group is supplying the capital, the concept, and are taking the risk - yet certain "gatekeepers" want to use their political positions to enrich themselves while ignoring the future gain of their constiuents - those they are supposed to to be serving. These "gatekeepers" are hurting south Dallas and its citizens - NOT helping.

  • Kim 10/20/2009 7:04:00 PM

    Article was great, but you still did not address why white business men and women are not held to the same standard legally nor ethically when it comeds to business in dallas county.

  • Alfredo 10/20/2009 12:04:00 AM

    Can we just make the Southern half of Dallas a seperate city, let Oak Cliff revert to a seperate city. I'm tired of the constant wine from the south side

  • Ji mS 10/19/2009 4:19:00 AM

    Dear AAF: If you don't have any jobs and you never had any jobs, and some guy comes here from Detroit or California or wherever and offers you 60,000 new jobs, what you do is kiss his ass, not introduce him to some damn "gatekeeper." What gate are you keeping anyway? How are you ever going to produce wealth in Southern Dallas if you can't get people from outside to put money in? And why should anybody invest if they know in advance they're going to have to go deal with a bunch of damn "gatekeepers?" People in this world go far and wide, sell hard and kiss a hell of a lot of ass to get investments in their communities. Sitting at the gate with your hand out is a loser Third World way to act. And by the way, the world never stops getting more competitive, so it might be time quit bitching about it and do it. If you need a consultant on that, call Leslie Jutzi.

  • AAF 10/18/2009 8:38:00 AM

    With alldue respect to the Allen Group I need some clarity.Pay someone from Detroit,who ,although black,and probably very competent,has to learn who the gatekeepers,and influences are in my community,but refuse to hire local people who already have the knowledge and influence to move the project forward expeditiosly,and in the process educate Ms Jutzi in the political culture in the community.I recently had an old friend come from Atlanta with a business concept that I considered a good idea. I introduced her to some gatekeepers and influences in the community. Some were millionaires, some were elderly church mothers,some were reformed criminals.What they all had in common was that their commuities followed their lead. If mr Allen were a mountain climber no matter how skilled,and he brought an expert on Mt Everest with him,it would make sense that in Africa he would find someone who knew Killamanjaro. By the way with tax abatements,the use of eminent domain,(remember the fair park homeowners),and redlining,(Blacks on an average get to fail once on a business loan regardless of good credit standing as opposed to multiple loans for whites) I am so tired and soul tired of people talking ethical concerns,when black people get in so called positions of power.Where is the uproar about the money Laura Miller got from Potasnik, nd hasn't accounted for.That's why I call black progress in America a Ponzi scheme.When we got high school diplomas the jobs all of a sudden required college degrees,then Masters degrees Our investments seeem to always to benefit others.When the city offices were at large, and majority white,where were the demands for theses strict impossible ethical standards? Nowhere to be found.

  • Anonymous 10/17/2009 3:36:00 AM

    "And, I hope, white people will one day get to quit paying off minorities in order to build or invest in South Dallas." Who's forcing white people to pay off minorities? That's just ridiculous... Everybody has a choice. Politicians have a choice to act in the best interests of themselves or the best interests of their constituents. S. Dallas voters have a choice: they can vote for politicians that act in their own self interest or vote for politicians that act in the best interest of their constituents. White people have a choice to "pay off minorities" or to tell minorities that seek payments from white people to go to H***. Minorities have a choice: they can be part of the solution, or they can continue seeking those payments. Knock, Knock, Knock. At the end of the day, there is something that we all need to understand. Those seeking payments and those paying them would have you believe that they are the only two parties in the transaction, but the rest of us are in the transaction too. Every time society looks the other way as payments get made, the problem gets worse. It results in one more project that fails because the people working on it really don't have the skills to do the work. It's one more developer who's project folds because he won't pay and no one will support him in standing up to the system. It's one more S. Dallas parent that has to find a job an hour away from home. It's one more S. Dallas child that doesn't get to see their parent that night because Mom or Dad had to work late, and by the time they got done with their commute, the child was already in bed... We all pay in the extra gas that we have to spend to drive someplace else for jobs, in the tenuous relationships with our family members because we don't get to see them during the week, in poor grades at school for children because Mom and Dad aren't there to help, in higher taxes in North Dallas to support services in S. Dallas... At the end of the day, who is benefitting from this system of whites paying minorities? We know it is not the majority of the minority contractors because they are not the ones who are getting the great contracts. We know it is not the majority of the white contractors or developers because they are the ones who are being harassed to make these payments. We know it is not the citizens of S. Dallas who lack basic services, and we know it is not the citizens of N. Dallas who are paying the lion's share of the taxes for these services. So, who benefits from this system? Who are the contractors and consultants that say that they are helping when in fact they are not? Who are the politicians that say that they are helping to make things better, when in fact things have not changed or they have gotten worse? Why do citizens in the region take a fatalistic approach and appear to accept that there is only one way to do business in S. Dallas, especially when that one way hasn't brought a successful change to the area?

  • Jim 10/16/2009 9:51:00 PM

    "But people black and white also talked to me about the unabashed racism with which City Hall has apportioned the basic elements of civilized urban existence�sewers, roads, water, power, police and fire protection�virtually since Reconstruction. If some people in southern Dallas seem to have a culture apart from mainstream values, it's not an accident." OMFG--What a bunch of crap. Dallas extends its services to every address in the city limits. South Dallas is not being denied any city services. I dare you to find one family in South Dallas who can't get water, electricity, garbage collection, etc., assuming that family is paying its bills. It's 2009. There a bi-racial President in the White House. Blacks are in powerful positions in every part of government. You don't have to apologize for being white anymore, Jim. And, I hope, white people will one day get to quit paying off minorities in order to build or invest in South Dallas.

  • Catbird 10/15/2009 1:43:00 PM

    Jim, I want to thank you for the authentic journalism you practice. This is difficult, demanding and often unrewarding work. In this day and age, it is a truely rare and much appreciated!

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy