Better Off Deadbeat: Craig Cunningham Has a Simple Solution for Getting Bill Collectors Off His Back. He Sues Them.

Unlike his neighbors' homes, Craig Cunningham's house in Northeast Dallas looks abandoned. The grass is dried out. The concrete slab under the front door is lopsided and cracked. The green exterior has faded to a toxic-looking shade. Yellow Pages pile up near the front door, and the black mailbox is stuffed full. Maybe the home has been foreclosed on. That wouldn't be a surprise in this economy.

Craig Cunningham says no one offered hurting small-time investors like him a government bailout when he landed deep in debt. That made him mad, so he decided to get even.
Hal Samples
Craig Cunningham says no one offered hurting small-time investors like him a government bailout when he landed deep in debt. That made him mad, so he decided to get even.
Steven Katz, author of a book on fighting bill collectors, says the idea that consumers have a moral obligation to pay their creditors is a myth created by lenders.
Janelle Montenegro
Steven Katz, author of a book on fighting bill collectors, says the idea that consumers have a moral obligation to pay their creditors is a myth created by lenders.

But no, that's not the case. Inside, the 29-year-old Cunningham hunkers his 6-foot-2-inch frame on a dumpy couch. His heavy arms extend from his sides, palms up, so two Chihuahuas, Angel and Chuay, can curl under them. Although it's 10 a.m. on a weekday, he's wearing slippers.

He leans forward to lift some paperwork out of a plastic tub on the coffee table. The phone rings, and he answers with a soft voice. It's just a friend, and soon he hangs up. He's waiting for a particular type of phone call—one from a representative of a debt collection agency or a credit card company, whom he'll try to ensnare like a Venus fly trap. It's not unlikely that Cunningham's next call will be from a bill collector, since he's between jobs—except for being in the Army Reserve—and owes $100,000 in debts.

While most Americans with unpaid bills dread the collector's call, Cunningham sees them as lucrative opportunities. Many collection and credit card companies, intentionally or not, violate little-known consumer rights laws, and Cunningham's favorite pastime is catching them doing so and then suing them. In fact, it's a profitable side job.

Call it ironic, but the only house on the block that appears to be the foreclosed end to some sad financial story is in fact the home of one of the debt collection industry's emerging and persistent threats. Cunningham calls himself a private attorney general—someone who files private lawsuits in the public interest. Debt collectors call him a credit terrorist.

Patrick Lunsford, who edits InsideARM, a trade magazine for the debt collection industry, knows the term. "There is a sub-group out there that does actually advise people on how to bait [collectors]," he says. "That's something that really gets under the skin of, well, obviously, collectors."

Cunningham beats the debt collectors at their own game. He turns their money-making practice into a financial liability. He is a regular guy who has become a radical enemy of the banking system.

In 2005, two foreclosures pushed Cunningham near financial ruin. Like many Americans, he fell enchanted by the siren's song of easy credit and borrowed more than $100,000 to bet on risky, high-yielding investments, such as stock in the now vilified sub-prime mortgage industry. Then, while stationed with the Army in El Paso, he attempted to become an absentee landlord and got zero-percent-down sub-prime mortgages to buy low-income four-plexes in Houston and Dallas. With the interest earned on his high-yielding stocks he was paying back his low-interest credit card debt; now, he was using the mortgages to borrow even more.

Then, the bottom fell out. Investors like Cunningham fell the fastest. He sold his Houston homes, but his Dallas properties were foreclosed on. The collection calls started. He was running scared.

Desperation took him online in a search of anything that could save him from his own $100,000 in bad choices. One afternoon while sitting on his couch in his El Paso home, he found a way to fight back. He stumbled across hundreds of other distraught consumers like himself on credit message boards, each with some different version of the same story of bad choices and greed. And, he found a new way to deal with his debt: He could hide behind the law.

His new online friends pointed him to a number of federal and state statutes protecting consumers like him against overly aggressive and abusive debt collectors and a credit system stacked against the little guy. If you knew your rights, he learned on the message boards, you were very likely to catch a collector violating them. Then you could sue.

Cunningham armed himself with this knowledge, and the next time a debt collector called, the trap was set.

It didn't take long. Cunningham had canceled a home alarm service with ADT Security after two months, and the company had billed him a $450 early termination fee, which he disputed. ADT sent his account to Equinox Financial Management Solutions, a third-party debt collector. The collection agency sent him a letter asking that he call back immediately. He dialed, armed with a voice recorder.

"Can you garnish my wages if I don't pay?" he asked.

"Yes," the voice on the other end of the line said.

"Can you put a lien on my house?"

"Yes."

Wrong answers. Turns out, Texas consumer rights laws are some of the most consumer-friendly in the country. And according to a federal consumer protection law, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), debt collectors are prohibited from threatening legal action that would violate state laws. In this case, garnishing wages or putting a lien on Cunningham's house would violate the Texas Debt Collection Act.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • anon 02/01/2012 4:38:00 PM

    Lol their are a lot of people on here that are berry upset about having to pay there bills off. If you don't owe money you won't ever get these calls

  • 01/10/2012 8:30:00 PM

    Not sure he is a hero. With decent credit and a low paying military job and or reserve military . His get rich with out capital investment back fired. Yes, many Americans did this. Also, many Americans have very low math, finance history and logic skills. So, he plays the victim.

  • 11/07/2011 7:09:00 AM

    creditwrench.com site is not even online anymore. I just checked, their site has gone under. Probably got sued by Craig Cunningham!

  • JJ 09/29/2011 5:04:00 PM

    Could this article be written any more biased? All hail the collector agencies, who cares if they use scare tactics and encourage consumers to screw themselves over. If someone decides to fight back, they're a 'deadbeat' and apart of a 'cesspool'. I'm not saying I agree with not paying back debt, but the fault is on both sides here, and there is no reason to say that only the debtor should have to pay for it. I have no debt and will never carry debt because of this bullshit.

  • 09/04/2011 7:59:00 PM

    I really feel what he's saying about the bank bailouts...those bailouts really ripped a hole in the idea of moral accountability. I mean, who could believe in our great American system after all that blatant graft... About the same time as the bailouts, I too was floored and got angry with all the struggling I had to do while these useless non-producing New York joos forward their financial concerns to the taxpayer. Allegedly, I decided to secure my own personal bailout by walking away, and no bank nor lawyer nor collection agency gets one red cent. Allegedly :D Probably why the banks are still having trouble. People have a natural tendency to walk away from bull sh_t. All goes to show, if you want to destroy something, send a government check...

  • Jrjanrakus 09/01/2011 3:15:00 AM

    He's a jerk- and walmart hired him as a store manager in nashville....he has the same ethics as a store manager as he has as a deadbeat who blames everyone else for his actions.

  • Jrrakusjan 09/01/2011 2:50:00 AM

    Too late, he's a store manager in Nashville

  • CJ 07/21/2011 6:20:00 PM

    I highly doubt he lost any of them...

  • CJ 07/21/2011 6:19:00 PM

    This guy is AWESOME! Way to go Craig. It would be a different story if debt collectors would act appropraitely, but they don't. They use illegal intimidation tactics and break the law to get your money. Screw them.

  • Shocked 05/04/2011 2:45:00 AM

    I now know as a wal mart costmer what is wrong with the company I can,t belive they would hire this type of person to work in a store its bad enought you can;t find any one to help you any more when you are shopping but to hire a person with this type of back ground just makes me ask what this conpany is thinking I just hope they have not put him in chharge of any thing important like the hole store .

  • Taspiderman 04/27/2011 9:58:00 PM

    bite me dude you can t do any thing about it hahaha

  • 04/27/2011 1:53:00 AM

    and stop useing my email address in the guest post

  • 04/27/2011 1:48:00 AM

    look i dont know who you are but you have coused me a lot of trouble by useing this name

  • Taspiderman 04/26/2011 3:10:00 AM

    hello

  • 04/25/2011 11:25:00 PM

    I have been told that some one is useing one of my user names on this site taspiderman i dont apreachate it i know this person in the story and i have nothing aginst this person what he does or has done is up to him but some how i have been connected to a comment made i just want every one to know that i have not made any comments on this site before now if i could remove the comment i would .craig i am sorry for any disconfont this my have coused .

  • Randywatson 02/24/2011 7:12:00 PM

    So at your clan meetings do they call you 'white employee'?

  • Randywatson 02/24/2011 7:10:00 PM

    You mad bro?

  • making an honest living 02/24/2011 5:21:00 AM

    he goes by russel...... needs to go back to texas.

  • white employee 02/24/2011 5:18:00 AM

    i work under him at walmart. haha he also goes by a diffenernt name. not craig. not many ppl at walmart like him........

  • No 02/11/2011 3:04:00 AM

    This dude is a total piece of crap.

  • Taspiderman 12/30/2010 10:44:00 PM

    he has lost every sute and is now working in walmart and treating every one like shit.

  • 12/27/2010 8:14:00 PM

    One should tread lightly when suing anyone. To bad most sites do not point this out like they should. A good article can be found on this subject http://www.collectorsexposed.com/forum/index.php?/topic/3507-article-2-on-pro-se-litigation/

  • Kelly H 10/30/2010 10:54:00 PM

    I think what you are doing is TERRIFIC!! Keep up the good work.. I may try some of your ideas as I have also experienced these practices from a collection agency. Although I knew they were commiting a crime with some of their tactics, it never occurred to me to sue them. hahahahah!!! kudos to you

  • sammie33 10/04/2010 8:07:00 PM

    Good point Franklin, This might make a great talking point and message for the Tea Party. Issues like this means votes for those speaking up for the common voter. And in an Election Year votes equals money and power.

  • franklin 10/04/2010 7:35:00 PM

    I read this and wonder why no one brings the one key point to that should be mentioned. It’s all about the money. That is the original creditor has either received payment from the bailout program or has just written off the loan and then declares as a tax write off. Then comes along these collectors purchasing these accounts for pennies on the dollar so now the original creditor just made a bit of a profit and the collector now attempts to profit by charging you the full amount that really no longer exists, why because it has already settled by the original creditor. I would think this would be the case unless it is the original creditor attempting the collection. If it’s not the original calling but now a collection company saying you own the full amount I would now wonder and ask if the collector purchased this at a discount and the original wrote off the loan then fist the loan was closed and the original creditor gets a tax write off, the company then sells this account to a collector making a small profit, then the collector contacts you attempting to collect the full amount in order to make a large profit. Seems organized crime uses this same method. My Points: Has the original creditor just committed tax fraud by getting the tax break and then making a profit off that deduction? I believe I would be in trouble from the IRS if I made a profit from a declared loss. We should only have to pay the collector for the amount that is now due and that is what they purchased this account for plus a very small fee. Are these companies paying taxes on these profits ? If we remove the profit margins these folks make then the number of these companies will decrease or at least the people that work for them may quit when then can only make minimum wage or less, but then in the current economy the workers may not have another option. And if that is the case then the collection company is exploiting there workers while making a large profit for the owner. We also need to make the employees personally feel bad for working at these companies, sure less workers means more profit but a the cost of more work, less time off and more stress for the few that are left working at these places. In reference to profits margins remember that these nice companies provide those great 800 numbers for us to call them back, and that they are paying for the number and by the minute just for us to call them 24x7 at no cost to you or me. They probably don’t like this impacting the bottom line. This is all the about the money and the trail it takes and stops. Perhaps a good project for the IRS or news organization, can you say Glen Beck (FOX). So one thing I’ve learned from all this is that I can start my own company based of the collector model and methods, I’m going to represent book publishers and book stores by going after you for the full amount of that book you just purchased at a discount. Or maybe the car manufactures, just think of the profit marge I can make. But how could this come close to the discussion? Remember that the medical field will go after you and send you to a collector for the discounted Just and Reasonable amounts they agree to with the insurance companies. So what is the difference, remember it’s all about the money.

  • Doug 09/29/2010 5:53:00 AM

    Wow! Is this board flooded with nothing but debt collectors? He should be able to sue you for profit. You zealously ruin people's lives for profit. You should be grateful he and other's don't snap and come after you. You guys setup a system of finance that is so imbalanced in the lenders' favor, and then whine when the thing blows up in your face and the people that can't pay you anyways figure out how to turn your own despicable tactics against you. If these hacks are bothering you, get a pay as you go phone and a google voice number. Unless you're stupid, they'll never find you. And, even if you are stupid, you can set google voice up to only accept calls from numbers you tell it to. All others can be diverted to oblivion, or another debt collector. :) And please, if you're a debt collector, through yourself off a bridge. Maybe try to hit a lawyer or politician on your way down.

  • Stu 09/10/2010 10:52:00 PM

    Looks like things aren't working out so well so deadbeat Craig. Let this be lesson to the rest of you sneaky rats looking to beat the system. http://www.insidearm.com/go/arm-news/-celebrity-fdcpa-litigant-slapped-by-texas-judge

  • Wemmick 09/03/2010 12:22:00 AM

    Collectors are truly the lowest of the low. They whine and cry and moan about complying with the FDCPA. "It's so technical..." I'm so sowwy for you. Do you want some medicine for you booboo? Collectors, if you can't play by the rules that Congress has established for you, you should be mad at Congress! Not at the people who simply defending themselves against abusive collectors in a rigged system -- NAF, anyone? Thank heavens that attorney generals in Minnesota and New York are taking these scumbag collectors down.

  • NewportQueen 09/02/2010 11:03:00 PM

    Now lets here the rest of the story where the judge is making this guy pay the attorney fees of the agency he was suing. Thats what he gets for trying to make a living off piling up debt then trying to sue anyone who trys to collect on the debt. http://www.insidearm.com/go/arm-news/-celebrity-fdcpa-litigant-slapped-by-texas-judge

  • Jay 09/02/2010 8:30:00 PM

    To all you who are in debt and reading this as a jailbreak from what you owe, please don't be stupid enough to believe all you read. This Craig dude lost his suit with CMI!

  • Melissa 09/01/2010 7:33:00 PM

    Yeah! This jerk finally got his comeuppance yesterday!

  • Hugh Labrey 07/15/2010 11:53:00 PM

    I have an issue with TU Electric Company that just came up or showed up on my Trans Union Credit Report. I have not done any type of business with TU Electric Since the year of 2004. However, my trans Union credit report is showing that I opened an Account with them on 03/2009 and was closed on 01/2010 with an unpaid balance of $226. This is totally false! So, I disputed it with Trans Union Credit reporting agency on 05/03/2010 and they reported back to me on 05/14/2010. Tran Union informed me that had verified the TU Electric as being correct and accurate!!! I called TU Electric on 07/15/2010 to dispute with them directly on this false information and I recorded the entire Telephone conversation. The TU Electric Customer Representative agreed with me that the DATE Account opened of 03/2009 and Date Account Closed 01/2010 was not correct, but flatly denied my request to correct the dates on my Trans Union Credit Report!!! This 20+ minute telephone conversation was recorded on my recording device. Do I have Legal grounds to file a lawsuit for damages????

  • mattsucks 07/14/2010 9:39:00 PM

    Hey Matt, you like to talk a lot and call other people names. What is your home address, let's have a little face to face chat.

  • AP 06/14/2010 9:18:00 PM

    I have read all the comments about this article and one thing stands glaringly true. If the debt collectors would simply follow the rules Cunningham, Katz, and every one else who employs these tactics would be completely powerless. The FDCPA isn't hyper-technical, in fact it is very cut and dry. It is and was put in place out of necessity because bill collectors have a long history of abuses. The biggest problem with the FDCPA is that it caps the punitive damages at $1000.00 instead of a thousand per violation. This is pocket change for most of the collection agencies. As for paying your debts, I'm all for it. However most of the time by the time a bill collector calls the debt has already been charged off, and they have actually purchased it for pennies on the dollar. At this point and time you usually couldn't pay the original debt if you tried....why...because the original creditor wrote it off in a hurry to clear the books and get the tax write-offs. Some of the commenters seem to see things in black and white, but lenders usually play in the grey areas. How many of you have heard of the credit card reforms that were recently passed. They were passed because of the standard practices that were being exploited such as "universal default" where if you are late on a card, any card, everyone can raise your interest rates. Then there is the infamous "bait and switch", you know the one where they promise you everything and give you nothing. One of my personal favorites is lowering credit limits...ooooh this is a good one, say you have a $200 credit limit and charge $190. They will often lower the limit to something say around $150 and pop you with over the limit fees. Or how about when they offer you let's say a $300 limit card and you accept it. Then when it comes in there have been so many charges added on the front end that it's maxed out and then they lower the limit to hit you with more fees! It happens people, don't be naive and think that it doesn't. Having said all that do I think Craig should have paid his bills, of course. But do I condemn him for making the bill collectors follow the rules, absolutely not. Again, if they would follow the law he would have no power.

  • SANCTIONS FOR CRAIG CUNNINGHAM 06/11/2010 6:54:00 AM

    http://www.webrecon.com/a/sanctions_for_scumbags.pdf

  • Sal 05/12/2010 9:34:00 AM

    Nada

  • PoorCollegeStudent217 05/03/2010 11:07:00 AM

    I have to applaud this man. In this day and age, the law has sided less and less with consumers and more and more with industry. Countless times, individuals have made mistakes in their lives, be it monetary, criminal or civil, and had to deal with the consequences of their actions, whether intentional or not. Lets face it, we are human. HOWEVER, the biggest flaw that I have read throughout all of these comments are why is he the bad guy? An interview in the article stated that most of these are mistakes and that they are not the industry norm, but why must they be exempt from the same mistakes that I as an individual could make? After one of my own bills for $89 was sent to a collection agency, I promptly proved that agency with a copy of the cashed check I had sent to the original debtor. That did not suffice and they continue to harass me. Only after I threatened to have my lawyer (my father; thank god for having one in the family) did they actually look into my "accusation" and determined that I was indeed telling the truth. If I had known then, what I had known now, I would have reported them myself for violations of my rights, because why should they get away with their wrongs? My biggest gripe seems to be with over half of these comments is that most of them see this action as unscrupulous, and the actions of these agencies as noble. Well folks, just remember that when you allow injustices that occur, you just ok these actions to continue; even if the original person is someone who was trying to live the american dream and got burned, or myself, a poor college student who was accused of not paying his bills (even though I do; I have a credit score in the high 700s and always pay my bills on time). "Justice is Blind," too bad it only seems to be in theory and not in practice.

  • Eric 04/26/2010 11:44:00 PM

    Minus the suing part I did this for some of my wifes medical bills. The hospital refused to accept a fair price as determined under one supreme court ruling or even talk about it. I would have paid a fair amount but nothing so excessive 5-10 times what they would have gotten paid by an insurance company. They sent it to credit collections 1 after another (farming is illegal btw) and they all stopped immediately after I sent them a letter telling them my debt was with the hospital and stated the laws that protected me This wasn't some over extending myself thing like the article. We had ER visits during a time we were almost bankrupt and couldn't afford insurance.

  • creditwrench 03/09/2010 4:37:00 AM

    This article really makes me laugh. Katz and Cunningham. Two birds of a feather, buth useless. Katz started out years ago with some dumbass idea about how to deadbeat his creditors and called it the Steven Katz method of agressive credit repair. He posted that dumb garbage all over a message board called creditnet and then started his own message board which promotes the same dumb stuff. He claims he sued some debt collector but he really had a lawyer friend do it for him. Craig Cunningham is even worse. Craig Cunningham and some other joker from El Paso sued me for a million and 40 thousand a couple of years back. They were ripping people off for credit repair and when I exposed them to the public and got them put out of business for running an illegal credit repair scam they sued me in federal court. I whipped the pants off of them and they got nothing. I could easily have filed a lawsuit against them but I refrained because I knew that they had nothing to go after. Not a pot nor a window. No use suing people like that. Cunningham always tries to file his lawsuits in forma pauperous meaning he is too cheap to even pay the court costs for the problems he creates for others. Cunningham and his buddies were incorporated in New Mexico and illegally operating a busineess in Texas. They were also not licensed as a credit repair organization as required under Texas State law. They were also operating their business in an El Paso residential area sans having an El Paso city business license. Cunningham had lost several federal court cases against debt collectors before he tried to get even with me for revealing the truth about them to the public and to the Texas State Attorney General who apparently ended up putting them out of business and an end to their illegal credit repair racket. Cunningham is nothing but a loser even if he does somehow manage to nail a debt collector or two. All you have to do to learn the real truth about Cunningham is look him up on Pacer and you will find out the real truth about him and his lawsuits whatever that truth might turn out to be. I haven't kept up with him since he got dumb enough to file a lawsuit on me. Reporter Thorpe ought to be ashamed of herself for giving this clown the time of day without first investigating his claims to see who and what he really is. She should have known better than to believe anything he said once she saw the condition of the house he lives in. That should have told her she was being scammed by a con artist from the git-go. One of my students accidentally ran into this story this afternoon and called me to tell me about this "great guy" down there in Dallas. I immediately recognized the clown and called my student back and told him about the real story, the real truth behind Mr. Craig Cunningham and his buddy. If you want to learn more about these two clowns go to http://thestevenkatzmeow.blogspot.com and get the rest of the story. Bill Bauer Ceo@creditwrench.com (405) 237-2174.

  • creditwrench 03/09/2010 4:35:00 AM

    This article really makes me laugh. Katz and Cunningham. Two birds of a feather, buth useless. Katz started out years ago with some dumbass idea about how to deadbeat his creditors and called it the Steven Katz method of agressive credit repair. He posted that dumb garbage all over a message board called creditnet and then started his own message board which promotes the same dumb stuff. He claims he sued some debt collector but he really had a lawyer friend do it for him. Craig Cunningham is even worse. Craig Cunningham and some other joker from El Paso sued me for a million and 40 thousand a couple of years back. They were ripping people off for credit repair and when I exposed them to the public and got them put out of business for running an illegal credit repair scam they sued me in federal court. I whipped the pants off of them and they got nothing. I could easily have filed a lawsuit against them but I refrained because I knew that they had nothing to go after. Not a pot nor a window. No use suing people like that. Cunningham always tries to file his lawsuits in forma pauperous meaning he is too cheap to even pay the court costs for the problems he creates for others. Cunningham and his buddies were incorporated in New Mexico and illegally operating a busineess in Texas. They were also not licensed as a credit repair organization as required under Texas State law. They were also operating their business in an El Paso residential area sans having an El Paso city business license. Cunningham had lost several federal court cases against debt collectors before he tried to get even with me for revealing the truth about them to the public and to the Texas State Attorney General who apparently ended up putting them out of business and an end to their illegal credit repair racket. Cunningham is nothing but a loser even if he does somehow manage to nail a debt collector or two. All you have to do to learn the real truth about Cunningham is look him up on Pacer and you will find out the real truth about him and his lawsuits whatever that truth might turn out to be. I haven't kept up with him since he got dumb enough to file a lawsuit on me. Reporter Thorpe ought to be ashamed of herself for giving this clown the time of day without first investigating his claims to see who and what he really is. She should have known better than to believe anything he said once she saw the condition of the house he lives in. That should have told her she was being scammed by a con artist from the git-go. One of my students accidentally ran into this story this afternoon and called me to tell me about this "great guy" down there in Dallas. I immediately recognized the clown and called my student back and told him about the real story, the real truth behind Mr. Craig Cunningham and his buddy. If you want to learn more about these two clowns go to http://thestevenkatzmeow.blogspot.com and get the rest of the story. Bill Bauer Ceo@creditwrench.com (405) 237-2174.

  • Matt 03/07/2010 6:22:00 AM

    I am a native Texan who moved to California during the height of their mortgage bubble, it is pathetic that people like this exist anywhere in the world. Craig didn't think taking out $100,000 in debt was a bad idea???..?? that it would catch up to him at some time? Though credit card companies are a bunch of thieves, they do have to disclose the terms of the loan given to you, you can't claim to be a blind consumer, only an idiotic consumer. The meer fact that people like this are in our country is sad, this is the reason why we are where we are, people like Craig... These people want to live the champagne lifestyle as long as they can get it on somebody else's dime, as long as they are not responsible for it.

  • Robert M 03/05/2010 2:29:00 AM

    This is how I see it. He's playing the system just like the system was used to play America and it's tax payers. At least he's not living some lavish lifestyle with million dollar houses and 100 thousand dollar cars. I say all the more power to him.

  • Michelle 03/04/2010 4:24:00 AM

    I find it sad to think that anyone would agree that it is okay to overspend by 100,000 and work harder at figuring out a way to not pay it than at finding a job and doing the right thing. If people would just realize overspending is what causes a lot of our country's problems we could work together to take care of it. We are in massive debt because of ourselves. No self control. Stupidity. Greed. Do us a favor and help ALL AMERICANS out by getting off your couch, going to work and contributing to the solution instead of causing more problems for us. You see I am a debt collector. I collect on student loans. There are millions of dollars in unpaid student loans out there. Eventually there will be no private lenders willing or able to lend money so desperately needed for many young Americans to go to college and better their lives. Yes, it is annoying to receive phone calls from a debt collector, but it has to be done. Imagine if no one cared about our country's debt. Imagine what it would be like if everyone just went hog wild because they could. If people just spent everything they could and borrowed as much as they could with no limits. Eventually there would be nothing left. No money to borrow. No money to get a paycheck. No paycheck, no reason to go to work. There goes our foodstores, gas stations, education, garages, doctors, lawyers, you get the point. So next time you borrow money make sure you really need to borrow the money. Make sure that you have a game plan on how you will pay it back before you even sign on the dotted line. Ask questions about penalties for nonpayment. Common sense really isnt that difficult to come by. If you loan money to a friend you expect it back, right? So how can a person feel okay about borrowing from a bank and not paying it off? I just dont understand people these days. And by the way if you really beleive that debt collectors are so horrible, pay your bills and you will NEVER have to worry about dealing with one. I guess thats all i have to say.

  • brokecollegestudent 03/03/2010 11:27:00 PM

    This guy is my hero.

  • Lee 02/23/2010 9:44:00 PM

    Matt 01/21/2010 9:26:42 AM @ "Jen" and "JBush" I find it comical that you place 100% of the blame on Cunningham. Maybe YOU should have done more research about the mortgage you were getting into before you signed the dotted line ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Matt I find you comical. Greg's post on 1/27 was SPOT on. They signed a lease with this idiot. They didn't have a mortgage. They were renting from him. He was collecting the rent but not paying his mortgage. Jbush and Jen... I'm sorry to hear about what this idiot did to you and your family. I hope things workout for you. Best of luck.

  • Johnny 02/19/2010 10:41:00 PM

    And now the racists come out of the woodwork... I knew it would only be a matter of time. Don't get mad at Craig, get mad at the law.

  • typical_white_person 02/15/2010 3:37:00 AM

    A West Point cadet or graduate? Why isn't this loathesome bottom feeder in Iraq? Nothing surprises me in the world of nobama....can you spell r-e-p-a-r-a-t-i-o-n-s? Expect more of the same the longer mohammoud sheihk al baraq hussein is in office...

  • Salty 02/05/2010 5:38:00 AM

    "Katz doesn't believe that people are morally obligated to pay back their debts" So if a drunk driver ran you over, they shouldn't be held morally accountable? Mr Katz, don't worry about those hospital bills, Mr Drunk Driver. Mr Katz says he's okay with it. If someone stole your money/belongings/car they shouldn't be held morally accountable? If your publisher or the consumer didn't pay you for your book, they shouldn't be held morally accountable? So no one should ever go to prison because people shouldn't be morally accountable according to Katz. Oh wait, they don't have to pay for the things they took either, so just go ahead, take stuff, take a life. It's cool with Katz. No contractual or moral obligations apply to him. Such an indifferent Kitty. "That notion was invented by debt collectors as a way to beat people into submission, he says." So, it's okay for anyone that owes you money not to pay you back because they are not morally obligated to? Can I have some money please Mr Katz. Just take a cash advance on your credit cards Mr Katz. I'll pay you back. Not! Too bad Kitty Katz. According to you I have no moral obligation to pay you back. Must be nice to work for free Mr Katz. "People are brainwashed to think that paying a credit card is more important than paying for the necessities of life," Katz says. - Doubt it or else the economy wouldn't be in such bad. Your version of "necessities of life" food, clothing , and shelter, and what most people think are necessities of life to them are very different. How's the computer, high definition tv, cable package, and cell phone plan? Not in your definition of necessities I bet, yet a lot of people count them as such. Not everyone thou. There are some hard luck cases. Based on what I've read, certainly not Mr "Vegas" Cunningham. "Nobody ever went to hell for not paying a debt" Maybe not, but Bernie Madoff sure ain't liking his new digs. Katz, the only reason you're in this article is to promote your e-book which according to you people should not feel morally obligated to pay for. It ain't free people. And according to the website - "At this time, it is not available in print or on CD. " What, no publisher wanted to waste the ink or paper? "In 2005, two foreclosures pushed Cunningham near financial ruin. Like many Americans, he fell enchanted by the siren's song of easy credit and borrowed more than $100,000 to bet on risky, high-yielding investments"Lets use that line again - "borrowed more than $100,000 TO BET on RISKY, high-yielding investments""Cunningham had no problem spending all the money anyone would loan him" Mr "Vegas" Cunningham bet and lost. Love this line. "He knew his military loan did not get reported to any of the three major credit bureaus, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. So, by paying off his credit card debt with money from that (student) loan." So Mr Cunningham used goverment funds from taxpayers that were to provide for his education to pay his credit cards in hopes he would be able to borrow more money from them by keeping his credit score high. He didn't use his own money. Hmm. "mortgage fraud committed by the seller" Just the seller? "Up until now, everything was about making easy money for Cunningham" -Nuff said

  • Ian wright 02/04/2010 8:35:00 PM

    This guy says the banks already have his money via the bailout. I want my tax money back that was spent sending him to West Point! Officer and a gentleman my ass.

  • abt 02/03/2010 6:40:00 AM

    Thanks, Craig. You've provided additional supporting evidence that immoral unethical jackasses run this country and the only reason they continue to be allowed to do so is due to the overly moral populace who will proudly stand idly by while their freedoms and livelihood are slowly funneled away by their own hand at the voting machine. It should come as no surprise that even with the law on your side the loud chants of ethics and morals would come crashing down on you. That doesn't seem to stop most politicians, don't let it stop you. The secret to being rich and powerful is pretty easy: smile, screw everyone over, and don't ever look back. What's unfortunate is it seems it took bankruptcy and foreclosure for you to realize this and not a West Point education. I guess they still discriminate at West Point.

  • voltaic 02/01/2010 10:20:00 PM

    One reason why the collection companies settle out of court is that they don't want to open up a hornets nest where they have to show phone records of other collection efforts to other customers. If they went to court, they would be paying out alot more than the 3500 they are paying now. The little guy can fight back, if he knows the rules.

  • Light in the dark 01/30/2010 11:24:00 PM

    Here in Sweden we have similar troubles with debt collectors. Me and a group called "The Poor Knights" are fighting against these lying companies who makes their own evidence, forgers names, lies in the court etc... Yesterday I won against one of the biggest companies here. They wanted me to pay on a debt that had already been written off for a sum of $1428,57 interest included. It ended in that they have now to pay me $571,43 before the interest of 8,25% hits the sum.

  • Steve 01/29/2010 8:11:00 PM

    Sounds like Matt has a little thing for Cunningham.

  • Joey Debtor 01/29/2010 12:24:00 AM

    third party collectors are the devil. really. no sympathy for them or their methods.

  • Paladin 01/28/2010 10:49:00 PM

    Imagine if you will, that you're a merchant of oranges. You arrange a loan from the Wall St. sharks to start your business. Then, those same Wall Streeters kill off the orange groves on which they had taken out insurance policies. Finally, they come to you demanding the money + interest they lent you. This is what the whole chain of command in the NY financial centers have done, aided by captured regulators, journalists, congressmen, etc. Mr. Cunningham is simply mad and he's not gonna take it anymore.

  • Matt 01/28/2010 8:38:00 PM

    To Jennifer from Garland, and Greg from Porterville, CA: Everything in life is a choice. Renting a home is a risky choice. Buying a home is also a risky choice. You choose to go into these things knowing the risks. If something bad happens, you are partly to blame for your risk. To say you aren't is flat out wrong. Keep coming back on here trying to tell me otherwise. It amuses me. This whole situation amuses me. This article may be about Craig, but it's also a testament to the value of making wise decisions regarding your living arrangements, prior to moving in. It's arrogant and naive to believe nothing bad can happen to you if you take a risk (like renting a home that's not paid off). It's also VERY easy to blame someone else for your problems. It's a lot harder to say, "Hmmm, maybe I shouldn't have rented a home that was under mortgage.... Wow... if my landlord fucks up, I'm up Shit Creek... I'D BETTER HAVE A BACKUP PLAN." Jennifer says I should "Get a life." Sounds to me like YOUR life is the one that's fucked up... good thing you have Craig to blame that on.

  • Jessica 01/28/2010 1:26:00 AM

    "I don't make the rules, I just play by them" That's the worst justification I've ever seen for being a loser. I'd be willing to bet this guy doesn't pay bills on purpose now so that they'll be sent to collections and he can dupe anoter debt collector into something worthy of a law suit. You should be standing up for yourself when you've been legitimately wronged and I applaud showing people what their rights are, but he's taking it to a whole new level to see just how much money he can get out of it to where he's becoming just as bad as the people he *claims* he's trying to get to change their ways. If he really wanted to help people he should be writing books and teaching classes on knowing your legal rights as a debtor, something a little more legitimate than posting on internet message boards all day.

  • Tess 01/27/2010 10:12:00 PM

    I'd imagine if Craig or Katz loaned people some money who didn't pay it back they would call it STEALING. This guy is a greedy, lazy thief who thinks we all owe him a free ride, why exactly? Because someone spoke unkindly to him about stealing from them? Oh, and here is a revelation for you Craig: no one cares what color you are. Man up and quit participating in the ruination of this country.

  • jwd 01/27/2010 9:41:00 PM

    I love how many commenters are so quick to show their peasant mentality and rush to the defense of collection agencies and other douchebag companies and banks. My friends, don't think being unable to pay your debts would never happen to you.

  • Sandy Parker 01/27/2010 7:51:00 PM

    Allow me to add another comment based on a false statement made below. Most states DO (not don't) allow one party audio recording. I say, don't openly tell me something that you are then going to lie about in court rather than worry about my recording you. This said, yes, you'all should be aware of which states require two-party knowledge as this is a common way in which innocent people trying to defend themselves are successfully bullied and persecuted.

  • Carrie 01/27/2010 7:44:00 PM

    This country was built on money in exchange for good and services. This person made irresponsible choices and took risks that were far beyond anything conservative. For him to enjoy the fruit of his risk then turn around and kick his creditors in the teeth because he is upset about his financial problems is just wrong. Unfortunately, collection companies are in place, because there are people in the US that think they're above paying for the debt they create. If everyone paid nothing, the economy in the US would be gone, as exemplified by the housing crisis. Yes, banks were at fault but individuals have to take a financial responsibility of not biting off more than they can chew. Judgment should be in place. People need to control their spending when a commitment is made to pay a mortgage payment of $1200.00 per month and they only bring home $2500.00 per month.If this gentleman would have simply set up a small monthly payment with his creditors, they would have worked with him. That is the appropriate way to deal with the inability of pay your bills. This man is arrogent and wrong. He is no better than anyone else and needs to be responsible for his actions. Bankruptcy is always an option.

  • Sandy Paker 01/27/2010 7:43:00 PM

    YOU GO GUY! As your actions are defending all consumers, you actions are SAINTLY!

  • Mike 01/27/2010 6:06:00 PM

    Get a job...you got yourself into this mess by trying to work the system and now your trying to get yourself out by working the system...this is what's wrong with america right now, people like this guy.

  • Greg 01/27/2010 6:00:00 PM

    Matt- You are an arrogant, pompous a-hole. Anyone who has to call a lady a bitch as he can't form a concise argument to the point proves that. Here is a scenario for you - I rent a house that is fully paid for and go through a reputed realtor for my lease. Does this stop the owner from taking a future mortgage against the house? no. I could check this with the recorder's office as you suggest for my own protection. What would be a required frequency to remove blame from me, monthly, daily, hourly, maybe I should just devote my whole life to making sure it hasn't been mortgagesd in the last 5 minutes? Perhaps I should also check the property tax records hourly as well, in case my landlord falls into arrears and they seize the property for a tax levy. Oh no, what if the landlord gets sued by anyone for any reason and the only asset he has to attach is the house I am renting? Should I also follow my lasndlord around to make sure he doesn't involve himself in any liability creating instances - such as driving? Spare me your obvious answer that I should own and not rent. I'm not one of the many in my area that just lost $300-400k in home "value" with the real estate crash - and proud of it. The bottom line is that the gentleman, as presented, entered into a contract that he had no intention of honoring. Regardless of some research being common sense, it is nowhere near foolproof against dishonest intentions or changing circumstances. Using your reasonong, I shouldn't have to pay any of my obligations as my creditors didn't fully research me or play out all the different scenarios that could occur in my life before I signed a contract with them. I'm glad you own your home and that situation works for you. That fact does not make you an expert or that your scenario works for everyone else all of the time.

  • Mark Lewis 01/27/2010 5:27:00 PM

    Wow...this guy is my hero! Serves these goons right to get a taste of their own medicine.

  • MOONDANCER 01/27/2010 5:05:00 PM

    IS IT LEGAL / Permissible TO RECORD THE CALL?. DO I HAVE TO TELL THEM I AM RECORDING? Is there any BAITING which I cannot do? Should I have a lawyer or is it easy to do it myself. Are there any other proofs I should be developing.? Are there some techniques to make my case better?

  • dh1 01/27/2010 5:01:00 PM

    Leech. And no, I'm NOT in the business - I'm an engineer.

  • Artie 01/27/2010 4:21:00 PM

    This guy is part of the problem and not a solution nor should he be rewarded for his failure to pay his debts. He is no different then the banks everyone wants to slam. He borrowed money in the hopes of getting a big return and then when it didn't work out the way he thought it was he wants to blame other people. While the banks certainly deserve some of the blame for loaning money to people who were high credit risk who should have remained renters. We all know that if they had not loaned money to these people then they would have been slammed of making it hard to get a credit or buy a house. We are all taught in School the phrase "buyer beware" Consumers who took out to much credit card debt and bought houses they could not afford are just as "greedy" as the bank who loaned them the money. Unfortunately those of us who have made a conscious decision to live below or within our means ultimate pay for the deadbeats like Craig.

  • MemyselfandI 01/27/2010 11:35:00 AM

    To: Jeremy from Dallas and all others who are slamming Craig: The government took our tax dollars (at gunpoint), and gave ("loaned") our money to multimillion dollar businesses to bail them out of their financial troubles, caused for the most part, due to their greed. To add insult to this injury, a large portion of the money was paid to top executives in the form of multimillion dollar salaries and perks. The money was paid to these "experts" in order to retain the talent...the same "talent" whose decisions got us into this mess in the first place. It does not matter that some have allegedly paid the money back, no one else would have been afforded the opportunity to be bailed out. "Regular" business people would have had to file for bankruptsy. "Poor" people have been getting forclosed on since Adam was evicted from Eden. It did not become a problem that could eventually bring down the entire world economy until the greedy financiers began turning poor people's debt into securities....that is what is immoral...not Craig.

  • masturbatingbear 01/27/2010 6:23:00 AM

    he's kind of a scumbag

  • Mark 01/27/2010 4:24:00 AM

    I understand that Craig Cunningham must feel frustrated and discouraged. But I can also tell from the tenor of his comments throughout this story that he is significantly morally challenged. He repeated says things that indicate two wrongs make a right, pointing out what others have done to justify his own irresponsibility. Sorry, but I just can't swallow this story.

  • Don 01/27/2010 1:51:00 AM

    Congrats , Craig ...And thanks to you and the Observer for making this info public . I hope everybody in the US reads this article , and the debt collection industry gets what is coming to them in spades !

  • Nick 01/27/2010 12:22:00 AM

    Are you seriously sitting here holding this man up like he is something special? Are you seriously telling people that this man is a good person? This man is nothing more than a piece of trash. He borrowed money he could not afford to pay back and now sits in his slippers on weekdays trying to sue people instead of getting a job. I wish I could meet this person so I could punch him in his worthless face. People like this man are what is ruining America.

  • Tom 01/26/2010 10:31:00 PM

    I support his fight against unscrupulous debt collectors. It is a sleazy industry that uses every means to squeeze the people least able to defend themselves. And if he makes some money by catching them in illegal behavior, then good for him. However, tell me again why he thinks he is not obligated to pay the original debts? Is he running up even more debt right now that he is not going to pay since he has found a way to support himself by being a deadbeat? Doesn't this cost us all though higher fees and interest costs?

  • Pamela 01/26/2010 10:21:00 PM

    Cunningham is brilliant!

  • D. Perfette 01/26/2010 10:13:00 PM

    This guy is nothing more than a scum bag. He wanted to play, he lost and now he's mad. So instead of taking responsibility for his actions, instead of being an adult man, he's passing off the blame. The recklessness, bad decisions and gambles were not of his doing. Of course not, someone forced him into it. That is so absurd and disgusting. Most of these violations are just that. The company should pay a fine but why should the deadbeat be entitled to anything. Was there injury. Whatever happened to having to prove injury, to be rewarded compensation. In some instances compensation may likely be in order, but many of the examples depicted in the article were absolutely absurd. To be rewarded $3,500 on a $45 utility bill, because the collector was wrong about the laws in Texas is ridiculous. There was not even a threat by the collector, he/she merely got the the answers wrong when "asked" by this deadbeat. And for that he gets $3,500. I'm certainly not for banks exploiting the public, but nor am I for scum like this who are just trying to pass off the blame and exploit the intent to get a whole lot of something for nothing. And yes, people who owe a debt "are" obligated to pay it back, morally or otherwise. Look up the definitions of debt and obligation.

  • dt 01/26/2010 9:17:00 PM

    Comment #1 by Jay encapsulates this perfectly. He's fighting sleaze with sleaze.

  • Urinal Gum 01/26/2010 7:26:00 PM

    "In 2009, nearly 10,000 cases under FDCPA, FCRA or TCPA statutes were filed around the country, mostly in federal courts." If a person committed 10,000 crimes, he would be taken out of commission (life in prison). Corporations, through the eyes of the law, are considered people. They have all of the same rights as people. Yet, they do not suffer the same consequences for breaking the law. For corporations, breaking the law is part of the cost of doing business. It's truly sickening, and it's why I will never feel sympathy for them. /we need to be helping real people: http://www.urinalgum.com/?p=157

  • Joe Bob 01/26/2010 7:05:00 PM

    This part is choice: Gordon ran his own third-party collection agency for years until a spate of FDCPA lawsuits in 2008 forced him out of business. He is familiar with Cunningham's type. "This is definitely, if I can use a really strong word, a cesspool..." I don�t think Gordon is in any position to say who is or is not in the cesspool. If you break the law so often that your business is bankrupted by lawsuits then I think you�re probably swimming in it yourself.

  • EnoughIsEnough 01/26/2010 6:32:00 PM

    Unlike most of you, hard working, tax paying, law obedient sheeple, this guy is at least sticking it back to the system. If all of you stopped being such milk cows and fought back, we would not be in such a mess.

  • Robert 01/26/2010 4:57:00 PM

    Katz is an idiot just like Cunningham. This is the type of inbred morons that frequent that laughable site Katz owns. Now I know Katz is probably just loving the publicity his site is getting from this and probably a lot of traffic as well. However if you actually spend some time on his site, you will see it is nothing more than nonsense. While there are other sites out there, such as creditboards.com, creditinfocenter.com to name a few none provide the filth that is spewed on Katz's site. My Cunningham and Mr. Katz are two peas in a pod. And of course if one actually read things on Katz's site you can tell he thinks he is God's gift to debtors. Cunningham is nothing but a cheap hustler with no morals. It is one thing if you are being abused by debt collectors, it is another to bait and trap them. More reputable sites do not promote such garbage and moreover use a lawsuit as the last thing in any type of credit repair. Good luck to people who have REAL problems with debt collectors, not invented ones. I bet the Judge in Cunningham's case in TX will love to read this article!

  • Richard A Golden 01/26/2010 4:51:00 PM

    Most law firms that do consumer debt collection work would say "good for him." Law firms know how to comply with the law. Other debt collectors that violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act should be driven out of business.

  • Jeremy Johnson 01/26/2010 6:33:00 AM

    Another asshole who thinks he is owed something by somebody and refuses to take responsibility for his own actions. Which, of course, costs every single one of us both monetarily but also as a society. Every single one of you out there reading this article saying, "Good job! Stick it to The Man!" are ignorant fools who are in actuality encouraging sticking it to themselves - making it that much harder for those of us who are honest folks to get loans, make deals to help us pay down our debt when things go wrong.... In short, you are scumbags.

  • MemyselfandI 01/26/2010 3:21:00 AM

    Way to go Craig!!! It is about time the large financial businesses got a taste of their own medicine. This does not excuse your dealings with your tenants but, some people recognize that there are at least 2(two) sides to every story.

  • Jennifer 01/26/2010 2:25:00 AM

    Matt- I have a question for you... Yes, you can always check the county records to see who owns the house - you are very right about this, congratulations. When someone owns a home, the bank does not file a foreclosure on you the first month you default on the mortgage. In fact, Matt, they do not foreclose on you the second month or even the third. Heck, it may take a year to get all the paperwork straight. In this case, you still OWN the house and thus, STILL end up on the county records (which were checked before the house was leased). So, my question is this - how do you propose someone check the mortgage of the house when you have absolutely NO legal authority to get information on a loan that is not in your name? If you are so smart - why don't you research your shit before you make stupid-ass comments. We are not idiots like you and went as far as we could - so why not focus on the real issue (Craig taking loans out that he has no intention of paying and then going after the companies for stupid shit). Get off of the fact that we were forced out of a home that he illegally went into a contract on. Oh, and don't assume we didn't call the mortgage company on several attempts just to find out that they could not give us any info. Don't assume we didn't go above and beyond and join the Texas Tenants Union to fully understand our rights. We know our rights, we know what we can do to go after him (if that is what we choose to do). I just had to set you straight. If you are so smart, sir, you should know what it makes you when you assume.... Oh, and since Craig hasn't posted in a while, maybe this is Craig - but I won't assume... Get a life Matt.

  • JoeOvercoat 01/26/2010 1:46:00 AM

    Katz is great: it's okay to steal as long as people don't notice right away. After you invite that guy to your house, you better count the silverware.

  • Matt 01/26/2010 12:33:00 AM

    Bob from London says: "He is greedy, short-sighted and has a completely spurious sense of entitlement. We complain about the bankers being greedy - at least they operate within the law." How is Cunningham operating outside the law? It is THE LAW that has allowed him to sue the collectors!!! Private companies have the power to sue Cunningham if they feel he has violated the law, just as he has sued the collectors for violating the law. I don't get what's so hard to understand about that.

  • guy 01/25/2010 11:40:00 PM

    Is this guy serious? He tried to make money with no actual investment. He tried to use fake credit and failed. He got what was coming to him. His statement "all I can do is be black and die." wow really making it look good for the rest of us "blacks"

  • oscar gibson 01/25/2010 10:51:00 PM

    now you made my day i for one agonized of my phone ringing knowing that it is a debt colected i owe nearly fifteen thousand in bill and all from the hurricane katrina and i am going crazy over what to do so to me kudos and kudos

  • bob 01/25/2010 10:22:00 PM

    You seem to be celebrating this cheating usurer? Why? He's abusing laws designed to give idiots a second chance. If enough people do what he's doing the laws will be tightened up. He won't care, he'll just move on to a different form of ambulance chasing. He is greedy, short-sighted and has a completely spurious sense of entitlement. We complain about the bankers being greedy - at least they operate within the law.

  • V for Vendetta 01/25/2010 9:43:00 PM

    Howee, please explain to me how filing bankruptcy is 'taking responsibility for your actions' or how failure to involve the courts is 'driving up the cost for everybody else'. If he lied on a loan application, that would be fraud. Thinking you are an investment genius and borrowing money to invest isn't fraud, even if the investment goes down the tubes and you can't repay the loans. If it was, Donald Trump would be in prison.

  • Rob in busted bubbleland Madri 01/25/2010 9:35:00 PM

    In non-recourse states you pay extra for the right to walk away from your house. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/business/economy/24view.html Guys like Cunningham are only doing what Wall Street has been doing for the little guy for years, screwing him He's my hero!!!!

  • T'd Off 01/25/2010 9:34:00 PM

    You get what you deserve you greedy p#$ck! Get a job and work instead of being a burden to the rest of us. You are right. You got burned. So pay your Fn bills. It is people like you who got us into this mess in the first place. I hope they sue you and you end up living in cardboard box. Thats what you deserve. Truly pathetic.

  • Katie 01/25/2010 9:08:00 PM

    Go Sir Go! Its about time someone stood up for the "little guy". So many of these credit agencies are downright HARASSING and rude that its unreal. Good luck in your lawsuit!

  • David Paulson 01/25/2010 8:39:00 PM

    This guy is a self-righteous leach on society, not some Robin Hood hero. I hope he loses everything.

  • Mags 01/25/2010 8:21:00 PM

    I am amazed. I have read 90% of the comments to this article. It would seem to me that we have "TWO WRONGS" here. 1. Greedy consumers. It is an illusion that you can have more than you can afford to pay for (that means NO CREDIT for anyone, for any THING).If you don't use credit and pay for what you buy at the time you buy it, losing a job or other set backs becomes more manageable. 2. Companies that break the law. Yes, there really are illegal debt collection practices used every day. Maybe the solutions include tightening the rules for getting "consumer credit" and verifying income and assets and liabilities to obtain a mortgage?

  • joe 01/25/2010 8:09:00 PM

    That's great. A******* like Cunningham can run up debt and then turn the tables to appear as if they are the ones slighted. This is analagous to having a crook break into your house, hit him with a baseball bat and then you go to court and get sued.

  • David Minnich 01/25/2010 7:19:00 PM

    Don't like what Mr. Cunningham does? Then start supporting efforts to reform our immoral financial system. Don't expect people to follow the rules with the miserable, corrupt system that we have now. It's ridiculous, the way the culture of our country has gone in the last 25 years - big business gets to do what it wants but regular people have to follow the rules for "moral" reasons. Double standards are immoral!

  • Ed Magowan 01/25/2010 7:10:00 PM

    This guy is a conniving weasel. He knew what he was doing and now he's not man enough to face it. He and people like him are part of the problem, not the solution, and deserve their bad fortune. No sympathy here, only disgust.

  • Howee 01/25/2010 5:08:00 PM

    Are you kidding me? Take responsibility for your actions. You bet and lost. You owe the money so either pay it or file bankruptcy. This is a prime example of what is wrong with America today, no one takes responsibility for their own actions. This guy made the decision to take the credit and now he is a leach. If you can't pay your bills you can file bankruptcy, that's what it's for. Instead this guy and those like him make credit more expensive for all of us. These types of suits do not protect the consumer, but rather drive up costs for everyone else to borrow money and in turn make it harder for the average man to borrow responsibly when he needs to. I think this guy should be prosecuted for fraud.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy