By Anna Merlan
By Lee Escobedo
By Alice Laussade
By Scott Reitz
By Claire Lawton
By Kiernan Maletsky
By Anna Merlan
There's an obvious stunt element to the casting of The Runaways: a punked-up, barely legal Kristen Stewart and a still underage, barely dressed Dakota Fanning begging for street cred by playing dress-up as, respectively, Joan Jett and Cherie Currie, front girls of the oversexed '70s-era teen proto-punk sensation, The Runaways. Watch Dakota strut around in a corset! Look at the chick from Twilight, kissing girls and snorting massive amounts of coke! But under the stylish direction of Floria Sigismondi, what may be a stunt is also a movie worth taking seriously.
The film opens in 1975, in a dystopic Los Angeles floating between the Manson murders and the Polanski rape case. Brought together by charismatic weirdo/record producer Kim Fowley (Michael Shannon), the girls develop a "product" based on "women's libido" in place of women's lib. Cherie and Joan become fast friends, drinking vile blends of liquor-cabinet pilfered booze under a decaying Hollywood sign. With "I want an orgasm!" as their Fowley-dictated rallying cry, the pushing-16-year-olds sell the notion that they're full of cum; young and dumb, it takes them awhile to figure out the dark side of hawking their sexual curiosity.
Jett is the first to wise up. When the band turns on Cherie for submitting to a solo soft-core photo shoot, it's because Joan understands that unless they set the terms of their own sexual empowerment, and its commoditization, then what's really happening is exploitation.
Jett's unique blend of allure and threat, apathy and determination, gets a mumbling, hyper-naturalized take from Stewart. Her performance is largely internal—risky, considering that the built-in audience that probably made the Twilight star appealing to producers might not know what to make of the actress playing a character with so much going on in her head. Fanning tacks the other way, bravely embracing the physicality of her role, but unable to nail its emotional complexities.
The girl-on-girl kiss at the center of the film shocks for the simple fact that it's not gratuitous. Cherie and Joan's attraction is less about sex than natural teenage emulation—they want to be each other more than they want to be together—and its consummation allows Sigismondi to show off her music-video-honed knack for creating deep wells of feeling without dialogue.
Sigismondi gets the most mood out of chiaroscuro lighting, invisibly elliptic editing and well-chosen source cues, but actually saying something is harder. In The Runaways' first hour, there's a guttural pleasure to be had in riding waves of rock movie cliché spiked with socio-sexual commentary. The movie is at its best when working through the contradictions of teen sex-for-sale. And Sigismondi's nearly avant-garde visual choices elevate what would be junk food into something more. It's only when she abandons the expected rock biopic forward motion that the film runs into trouble.
The Runaways didn't sing slow songs, and Sigismondi falters in trying to choke the film down to contemplative ballad-speed. After defining Cherie and Joan as two halves of the same whole, Sigismondi loses her way when the girls' personal problems tear them apart. Joan gradually adopts a modicum of self-control, while Cherie spirals through drunken public meltdowns and beyond into the ultimate embarrassment: a straight job. This drowsy spell snaps when Jett is apparently struck by divine inspiration to cover "I Love Rock 'n' Roll." Sigismondi returns to the rock cliché that fueled the best stretches of The Runaways, but junks the visual daring and feminist questioning. It's sexy, but in the end skin-deep.
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city