At SMU, Winning On The Field Is Being Sacked By An Unwillingness To Accept The Academically Less Gifted.

Amid grumblings throughout its coaching staff, disappointment among its recruits and an uprising from its alumni, SMU football found itself under duress last week. As two incoming freshmen were denied admission to the school despite having the academic qualifications to play at almost any other NCAA program, coaches wanted answers, boosters sought changes and reporters asked questions.

The result: SMU audibled into damage-control mode.

NEWSCOM

SMU football coach June Jones may be unhappy that the university’s academic standards have thwarted his recruiting efforts.

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy Cancel Continue

In an attempt to douse the spark before it becomes a flame, the Mustangs on Friday sent out prepared statements from athletic director Steve Orsini and head coach June Jones.

"I fully support SMU's academic standards and view them as an asset to our football program," read Jones' statement. "I am as confident as ever that SMU can offer the best both academically and athletically, and I look forward to many years of our collective success."

Sorry SMU fans—Kumbaya be damned—things aren't happy on the Hilltop. The way the Mustangs want it to be eventually, just isn't the way it is currently.

Otherwise, why is Jones putting off signing his new contract?

Jones arrived in Dallas in 2008 determined to tackle what he called SMU football's embedded "culture of losing." With last season's 8-5 record and the school's first bowl game victory in 25 years, that mission is accomplished.

But now, an even tougher task: blocking the SMU administration's academics-over-athletics society of stubbornness.

"June and his staff aren't getting the support they were promised," says a source within the SMU athletic department. "There's a lot of head-butting taking place."

Jones desperately wants to comfortably coexist with SMU's administration, and if part of that process requires him to temporarily swallow his pride and camouflage the truth via a warm-n-fuzzy statement, then so be it. But so disillusioned is Jones that he has yet to sign a contract extension offered to him last November. That extension, presented near the end of SMU's first successful season since 1984, was trumpeted in a press release indicating Jones would remain the Mustangs' head coach through 2014. But Jones not only has refused to sign the extension, he has also privately expressed doubt this summer about remaining on the Hilltop for the remainder of his initial five-year, $10 million deal.

"Everyone in the program is frustrated," says the source. "There's the thought of, 'If they want to go 1-10 every year fine, but they'll do it without us.'"

Though Jones and school president R. Gerald Turner declined to directly address the issues with the Dallas Observer, and despite multiple sources indicating those two, along with Orsini, plan a clear-the-air summit this week, SMU associate provost Tom Tunks is attempting to preach harmony.

"I don't sense any friction, and if there was any I'd pick up on it," says Tunks, who has overseen the school's undergraduate admissions since 1998. "Things are fine. I don't think there are any problems at all. We are really unified here."

Darryl Jackson and a host of hostile alumni vehemently disagree.

After Jackson and co-recruit Jeremy Hall were recently denied admission by SMU's Faculty Athletic Admission Subcommittee, an irate group of fans formed a "We Are Not Going Back" committee. The faction, headed by members of the school's Lettermen's Association, asked for $300 donations to, in part, pay for an anti-Turner ad proposed to run this week in an issue of The Dallas Morning News unless the president apologized in writing to Jackson and Hall and allowed them to enroll at SMU in time for fall classes and football season.

"We are fed up, and no longer willing to accept the administration's position with regards to (specifically) the refusal to admit certain incoming student athletes to SMU," read an e-mail circulated within the group last week. "If these demands are not met, the gloves are coming off. It will be ugly and it will be very public. Enough is enough. We are not going back to the days of Phil Bennett and 1-win seasons."

In conjunction with Jones' arrival in January '08, SMU remodeled its admissions policy to be, according to Tunks, clearer but not necessarily more lenient. Though competing schools like Texas Tech and Baylor accept NCAA qualifiers, prospective SMU athletes are automatically referred to the admissions board if their SAT is below 900 or their high-school GPA below 2.5.

The five-member committee is charged with granting admission to athletes who have a "reasonable chance of success," defined by SMU as having at least a 50-percent chance of graduating.

"You'll never get a perfect system because it involves judgment calls," Tunks says. "But I think it's working. No university wants a losing team. But at the same time, it's not fair to ask these students to do something they can't do. That would be setting them up to fail."

Sounds simple and, at least statistically, it's efficient. Tunks said that since Jones' arrival 25 incoming freshmen football players have gone before the committee and 23— either initially or after a maximum of two appeals—have been admitted. It's the two who were denied—Jackson and Hall, the last two to go before the board—that have alumni pissed and coaches perplexed.