The Dallas Cowboys Have 10 Of Their Legends in The Hall of Fame. So Why Do Their Fans Feel Canton Has Mistreated America's Team?

Stop it.

Yeah you, the rabid Dallas Cowboys fan with painted face and silver-n-blue panties in a wad. Your popular old refrain about some supposed Cowboys prejudice among Pro Football Hall of Fame voters makes about as much sense as Mixed Martial Arts fighter Chael Sonnen claiming iconic cyclist Lance Armstrong gave himself cancer.

When Emmitt Smith was inducted into Canton last weekend he became the 10th Cowboys player to earn football immortality in addition to former general manager Tex Schramm and legendary head coach Tom Landry. In the last five years, five Cowboys have been knighted into the Hall of Fame.

While there's probably a better argument to be made about Cowboys favoritism than anti-'Boys bias, the irrational cries for more Canton Cowboys continue.

It's asinine. It's embarrassing. It's wrong. It's...on full display inside San Antonio's Alamodome during Cowboys training camp.

"We're America's Team, the best team in the history of football!" says San Antonio fan Hector Ramons in between impassioned screams for quarterback Tony Romo's autograph. "We won three Super Bowls in the '90s. Almost every player from those teams should be in the Hall of Fame. How is that fair? It's not! Everyone hates the Cowboys...because they're jealous."

All together now: I love the Cowboys. But I hate Cowboys fans.

Every player is a star. Every referee has a grudge. Every season that doesn't end in a Super Bowl championship is a fluke. Every Cowboy should wind up in Canton.

"I don't know about any Hall of Fame bias," says former Cowboys defensive end Charles Haley, a member of the '90s dynasty that won three championships in four years. "Seems like we're filling it up pretty good."

Truth is—and this one's gonna sting—those beloved '90s Cowboys were underachievers. That's right, underachievers. Think about it.

In the same offensive huddle the Cowboys were blessed with four Hall of Famers in Smith, quarterback Troy Aikman, receiver Michael Irvin and slam-dunk future enshrinee and offensive lineman Larry Allen. Certain Hall of Famer Jerry Jones owned the team, legitimate Canton candidate Jimmy Johnson coached it and on the defensive side of the ball were probable inductee Haley, no-brainer Deion Sanders and possible member Darren Woodson.

Maybe it's just me, but—impressive as it is—shouldn't six Hall of Famers produce more than three titles?

Perhaps that's a tad harsh, but no more absurd than fans moaning and bitching about the absences of former Cowboys such as Drew Pearson, Cliff Harris and Harvey Martin. Yes, Pearson was named to the NFL's All-Decade Team of the 1970s and was Roger Staubach's favorite target in the clutch. Yes, Martin was co-Most Valuable Player of Super Bowl XII and the most feared pass-rusher of his era. And yes, Harris is a member of both the Cowboys' Ring of Honor and the league's '70s All-Decade Team.

But sorry, not everyone gets in. Relatively speaking, Dallas is well represented.

"I'd love to see Cliff and Drew and Chuck Howley get their due," said 1980 Hall of Fame Cowboy Bob Lilly last week. "But I don't think playing for a team as successful and visible as the Cowboys ever hurt anyone trying to do anything. It's a huge advantage."

The Chicago Bears have 26 members in the Hall of Fame, but their franchise has been around since 1920. Of the teams born at the same time or later than the Cowboys in 1960, only the Oakland Raiders have more representatives, 13 to the Cowboys' 12. The Philadelphia Eagles, for example, have been playing football since 1933 with only nine Hall of Famers to show for it.

On the heels of Aikman and Rayfield Wright in 2006, Irvin in 2007, Bob Hayes in 2008 and Smith in 2010, the Cowboys seemed primed for the immediate future. Sanders (who won a Super Bowl as a mercenary of sorts in Dallas in '95) will be a candidate next year, Haley (who won three of his five championship rings as a Cowboy) was a finalist this year and Allen (a rare two-time All-Decade player in the '90s and '00s) will be a first-ballot winner in 2012.

"I don't want to be too presumptuous," said Jones at training camp last week, "but we might be headed back up to Canton a couple more times pretty quick here."

This year's Cowboys also have high hopes, but no Hall of Famers. Not yet, anyway.

Linebacker DeMarcus Ware is one of the NFL's most prolific pass rushers. And Jason Witten is already a prime candidate for the Ring of Honor as the best tight end in franchise history, capped by six consecutive Pro Bowl appearances and the second-most catches as a Cowboy behind only Irvin. But for the most part, the 2010 Cowboys will attempt something great behind players that have so far only proved to be good.

"This team reminds me of us back in the late '60s," Lilly said. "For a couple years we were good teams that couldn't get over the hump and people started to label us and so forth. It was just a matter of time before it all clicked and we had that breakthrough season. I can see something like that happening to them this year. They've got the pieces in place."

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Paul 09/03/2010 5:36:00 PM

    The Cowboys have 10 but they should have more. That's why there's a claim of bias. We shouldn't be content just b/c they have 10. Emmitt, Aikman, and Irvin are obvious choices. But what about the obvious choices from the past like Cliff Harris and Harvey Martin?

  • stan spraggins 09/02/2010 8:47:00 PM

    The Cowboys will not make it to the Big Bowl...They will implode...can't take the pressure...Steelers '08...Vikings '09

  • Rich 08/17/2010 8:08:00 AM

    Since Emmitt acknowledge his offensive lineman, and you mentioned future HOF Allen, how about Stepnoski and the entire Ol that openend up those holes for Emmitt to run through? for the first time in history, I think the entire OL for these Cowboys should be considered as a group, not individuals. They did such a dynamic job for Emmitt that it would be fitting for a special honor to be bestowed upon them. Stepnoski was magnificent, along with the others in various combinations. At times these holes were big enough for a semi-tractor trailer to get through. Anyway keep up the excellent articles. I also enjoy you and Gregg0O on the radio every day. Thanks.,

  • Rasputin 08/15/2010 1:08:00 AM

    You're a moron. The Eagles suck......doesn't matter how long they've been playing. Just for some context.... Total Hall of Famers / Total NFL Championships + Super Bowl wins (excluding last decade*) Bears - 23 / 9 - 2.56 HoFers per title Packers - 19 / 12 - but 8 players and 3 SB wins for 2.67 modern era HoFers per title Giants - 14 / 6 - 2.33 HoFers per title Lions - 14 / 4 - 3.5 HoFers per title Steelers - 13 / 4 - 3.25 HoFers per title Browns - 13 / 4 - 3.25 HoFers per title Redskins - 13 / 5 - 2.6 HoFers per title 49ers - 12 / 5 - 2.4 Hofers per title Raiders - 11 / 3 - 3.67 HoFers per title Cowboys - 10 / 5 - 2 HoFers per title Cardinals - 9 / 2 - 4.5 HoFers per title Dolphins - 8 / 2 - 4 HoFers per title counting Warfield and Buoniconti, otherwise 3 per title Vikings - 8 / 0 - Are you kidding me? And Chris Carter could go in any year now too. *The guys on those recent teams mostly haven’t even been considered for induction yet. Dallas has the highest all time winning percentage, the most playoff appearances, and the most conference championships, but so far that hasn't translated into extra HoFers. If Cowboys were at least inducted at the rate Giants were for their championships alone they'd have a couple more guys in Canton right now. If they were inducted at the rate of the modern era Packers they'd have 3 more guys in the Hall of Fame already. If Cowboys were inducted at the rate of Steelers or Browns they'd have 16 players in the Hall of Fame. If Cowboys were inducted at the rate that Raiders are Dallas would have at least 18 players in Canton. If voters liked them as much as they like the Vikings there would probably be 25 Cowboys in the Hall of Fame already, lol. The Cowboys are clearly under represented. In the future please educate yourself before you whine about people more intelligent than you are. I'll thank you in advance.

  • Big Money 08/14/2010 12:27:00 AM

    I think the biggest dissatisfaction for Cowboys fans is that the steelers had 10 HoF'ers from their 70's run, and they were not the dominant team that the 90's Cowboys were. In fact, the steelers did beat our '70's Boys twice in the big game only by a mere 4 points each time. One could make the case, then, that the Cowboys were close to the steelers, whereas the bills of the 90's and the steelers of the 90's were not so competitive with Dallas. The Cowboys have had to scrap and fight to get HoF'ers from the same 70's era when they dominated the Super Bowl schedule with 5 appearances and 2 championships, not to mention appearances in the NFC championship games 8 times in the decade. Ask any team in the NFC at the time and they will tell you Dallas was the dominant team. It is NOT right that such a successful team should get so little recognition from the Hall for that era. While I'm not a RABID fan, I do have a brain and more sense than some off-beat half hearted overblown writer/ radio guy whose work is found only at the bottom end of the media spectrum around here. You piss off people with common sense. Are you 1 percent sure about your thoughts in this article? Loser. This was my first and last foray into your writings. Please don't try to entertain me again.

  • Ryan Kirk 08/13/2010 9:09:00 AM

    Dude, really? "Maybe it's just me, but—impressive as it is—shouldn't six Hall of Famers produce more than three titles?" There has only been 44 played dummy and the cowboys have won five of them. And by the way, only eight players are even in the hall of fame right now. Two are a GM and Coach. They don't count towards player totals, nor do people who "might" make it as trying to use possible future people in your argument is just sad. Number of players in right now is still only eight, and only three of them are from the 90's. Meanwhile the cowboys have 5 rings and seven appearances at the super bowl. You know what, I could go on, but your article is not worth it.

  • Michaelangelo 08/12/2010 11:03:00 PM

    Your comment about the 90s Boys having 6 presumptive HOFers and only winning three Super Bowls is one of the dumber things you've said in a while. By that rationale, the 70s Steelers were the biggest disappointments in pro sports history, considering they had 9 Hall of Famers but only managed to win four Super Bowls.

  • Ken 08/12/2010 7:34:00 PM

    Sorry to go ahead and whine, but I think there was some favoritism toward the 1970s Steelers over some 70s Cowboys due to the Steelers winning the head-to-head Super Bowl matchups. Only 2 first teamers from the NFL All Decade 1970s team are not in the Hall of Fame - Drew Pearson and Cliff Harris. Franco Harris, Terry Bradshaw and Mike Webster, All-1970s second teamers are all in the HOF. The real crime is why Drew Pearson isn't in the Cowboys Ring of Honor. Any guesses on that one?

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy