-
Paddymc 05/25/2012 9:34:00 PM
Good for southlake. Hmmm....new fire engines and computers, etc while possibly poisoning yourself and your children.
I'm amazed that so many are so blind to the potential dangers of tracking. Unbelievable! Aesbestos was once declared safe. So was lead paint. DDT...the list can go on and on.
Too bad southlake is an island surrounded by drilling and they are breathing polluted air anyway.
-
SouthlakeCarroll Graduate 02/26/2012 2:28:00 AM
Keep describing Southlake that way...we feed off of it!
-
BringIt 12/28/2011 1:57:00 AM
Interesting how you attacked the only intelligent response...
...and if it were a choice between that and you, she'd probably consider it...
-
Willie 12/22/2011 2:46:00 PM
Wow, you might want to light some candles and get the vibrator out.
-
EndFrackingNOW 12/20/2011 10:11:00 PM
Your article disgusts me. Your stereotyping of Southlake is no different than if I said Dallas was populated entirely by low-income minorities.
I don't have blonde highlights, don't have green eyes, don't have a soft voice, and don't drive an expedition.
I am a single mother struggling to put my kids through school here because it's a GREAT community to live in.
And if you think this town hasn't had it's share of recession impacts, you came in here with blinders on.
Many people in Southlake don't want the drilling because we've researched it and know how bad it is. Why don't you run a piece on the dozen or so families in Dimock, PA who have no water because of contamination from fracking AND the O&G gas company stopped delivering clean water to them?
Or go interview the families in the community in Flower Mound that make up 20% of all cancer cases in Denton County. Guess what that small community lives near...that's right, a drilling site.
"The women here often get together to play bunco in each other's living rooms and tennis at the country club..." WHATEVER...
Every woman I know here works hard...very hard...
Shame on you for creating class warfare...
Go do something useful with your time. If not, then go write movie reviews...your verbosity is better suited there...
-
12/19/2011 11:54:00 PM
The description of the place sounds ghastly.
-
12/05/2011 5:26:00 AM
Really do need to re-read your really bad research. They did not go bankrupt because of the reasons you have cited. The O&G Industry doesn't want any of these breakthroughs. Solar is ready to go unless O&G destroys it.
-
12/05/2011 5:19:00 AM
Oh, like the less affluent can't "afford" to debate its merits or its pitfalls?? That's ridiculous.
-
12/05/2011 5:16:00 AM
Maybe. But when you live in a neighborhood you don't have large acreage and you certainly don't want to have pad sites at the borders and entryways. "Mineral owners" with small acreage are definitely not the same as mineral owners with large parcels of land. But then the industry doesn't mind people thinking that no matter how much land they have they will "get rich." Southlake understood that early on. We should all have been so lucky. The large landowners in any city or town will be the ones the industry wants to lease first. Then they can influence the rest of the townfolk to get on board. Then they can move when they realize their land is ruined forever...leaving the mess for those who aren't as able to get out.
-
12/05/2011 5:09:00 AM
You don't need to be a Petroleum Engineer to know that shale gas drilling and fracking are bad.
-
12/05/2011 5:05:00 AM
I doubt very seriously that the industry would like to pit itself against home rule. When push comes to shove, anyway. It's truly a matter of cities determining what kind of businesses and development they want in their jurisdictions. It's all about protecting the citizens. The more and more awareness of all of this...the more difficult it will be. Leaving Southlake is one sign of that change. The "mineral estate" is different in every state. Texas wrote these laws saying the mineral estate was "dominant" early on. Not all states have this same law. Once we move away from the worship of fossil fuels...the "mineral estate" will be a thing of the past. The industry loves to threaten cities with this stuff.
-
12/05/2011 4:53:00 AM
I hope you are able to live in your micro-ecosystem someday all by yourself. You obviously aren't looking at this issue up close and personal or you wouldn't be so arrogant about it.
-
Edgar 12/04/2011 11:46:00 PM
"...we all drink the same water and we all breathe the same air."
I swear I'm gonna live in my own micro-ecosystem someday. Not to avoid fracking, but to refute this lame-ass cliche so no one has to hear it anymore.
-
Edgar 12/04/2011 11:41:00 PM
It's frequently noted (or at least argued) that those who oppose drilling are probably ones who own no mineral rights and thus stand nothing to gain. It's probably not surprising that this observation does not hold true in Southlake. A few thousand bucks per mineral acre and a modest royalty income stream means less the wealthier one is. The affluent can afford to oppose drilling without paying close attention to either its merits or its pitfalls. That doesn't help us answer the question of whether fracking is, in fact, unsafe.
-
12/04/2011 4:55:00 AM
What caused Google to ban your website? There are numerous factors that can trigger Google to either penalize your website by pushing it far down the line in the rankings, or to ban it entirely and remove it from Google, as well as other Google partner sites.
-
12/02/2011 10:50:00 PM
Give it a few more years, you'll be able to afford it. Just like what Bartonville has turned into, high dollar homes that are now worthless-to the point where quite a few of the homeowners simply left. You can't drive a block in Bartonville without passing a For Sale sign. Hmmm, I wonder why?
-
12/02/2011 10:35:00 PM
I wish I could afford to live in Southlake. Instead, I'm stuck in Dirty ol' Fort Worth.
-
Todd Gamble 11/30/2011 5:10:00 PM
I cannot wait to move away from Southlake. Had I known this little place was populated mostly with yankees and born agains, we never would have bought a house here. Most of these moms who consider themselves "self taught petroleum engineers" can't even operate the Carroll school system's Skyward application to monitor their kid's progress in school, much less use Excel or Word. But if you want to have an extramarital affair, join a bible study class at Gateway or White's Chapel -- they all use the convenient excuse that the devil was trying to upset their wonderful life (time and time again).
Milner, Wright and Rucker are now living in a locale they couldn't have imagined twenty years ago.
-
11/30/2011 4:36:00 AM
Perhaps - just perhaps - if everything is done 100% correctly then it may be completely safe. But then, we know how interested in safety the oil and gas industry is, don't we? I mean, there is no way a multi-million dollar drilling rig in the Gulf could ever blow up, right? And leave a big hole in the bottom of the ocean, right? Dumping tens of thousands of barrels of oil into the ocean, right? And we want those guys drilling right next to our homes and schools, right? Sounds good, where do I sign?
-
11/30/2011 4:19:00 AM
"At the depth of the drilling in the Barnett Shale the chemicls will NEVER come to the surface. If you think so then why isn't the oil/gas coming to the surface?"
Mmmmm, because there isn't currently 5000 lbs per square inch of water pressure down there blowing the ground apart. And because there are no wells/pipes crammed down there trying to bring stuff up to the surface.
-
Guest 11/30/2011 3:19:00 AM
"Southlake has every right to build out their city as they wish"
Not necessarily true. They are limited through pre-emption by the state and fedral governement and they also may not condemn the dominant mineral estate.
-
Guest 11/30/2011 3:13:00 AM
Whoa! If that is not evidence of te crazies that oppose drilling? I have a nose bleed. It must be due to the gas well 20 miles away. It couldn't be that I am a hypochondriac, crazy or dry air..it must be drilling.
-
11/29/2011 8:56:00 PM
From my reporting, primi, I didn't see it break down so clearly between those with mineral rights and those without. Many of the younger folks with kids, as the story notes, own their mineral rights and were paid well -- though certainly not as much as Joe Wright and Zena Rucker, who are much bigger landowners.
-
11/29/2011 5:36:00 PM
My God Louschell, Haven't you learned anything about "Green" energy after the Solyndra and Evergreen debacle? Both companies went bankrupt because it is too expensive to produce solar energy. Today the news stated that Solyndra's solar panels would generate electral power in the range of .60+cents /Kwh compared to around .05 cents/Kwh with coal fired power plants. Biofuels are in the same boat. There has not been any "break throughs" in these types of energy producers to make producing energy through other means financially viable. Also, drilling is NOT a short term fix. There is enough gas/oil to last centuries if we could get the likes of the "No Drilling" people out of the way and let progress move us.
-
11/29/2011 5:20:00 PM
Sorry, you are completely wrong. At the depth of the drilling in the Barnett Shale the chemicls will NEVER come to the surface. If you think so then why isn't the oil/gas coming to the surface? As far as the "bad chemicals" are concerned I don't think there is anything worse than what is down beneath the surface already, such as H2S. This H2S is a very very bad "chemical. H2S is oderless, clear, and super deadly. One breath and you die. Absolutely there are risks to drilling, but there are greater risks in everyday life, and everyone takes those risks as part of living. No, please don't say that these everyday risks are risks that people must take in order to carry out their daily lives because they aren't. Drilling in Southlake is a good thing over all. The revenues will generate a lot of money for the schools and other things to make Southlake a great place to raise a family. I suggest people do their own homework on this subject by asking our neighboring cities who have allowed drilling to take place what they think.
-
11/29/2011 4:49:00 PM
I would guess the fault lines were between mineral owners, especially owners will lots of acreage, and non=mineral owners, or those with very minimal acreage. Next time follow the money.
-
11/28/2011 5:37:00 PM
Google Fracking then find the list of "some chemicals" that are pumped into the ground. Nasty, Nasty, Nasty stuff. The water that is being used is now polluted with those same chemicals. The energy companies are relying on our out of sight out of mind mentalities. There are places in the US where these chemicals are coming to the surface.
-
Louschell 11/28/2011 4:37:00 PM
Why can't we get on board with renewable energy? Drilling is a short term fix to a long term problem.
-
Darrd2010 11/28/2011 3:30:00 AM
Those who are not informed, tend to favor the industry much like the banking industry. Loose regulations and only the industry makes the big money while those who sit at home with credit card debt jump at the prospect of a $75 a month check. In time, the true price will ask to be paid with our health and environmental costs. Then what?
It's coming. Watch for it, now breathe deeply.
Dallasdrilling.wordpress.com
-
Texaspainter 11/28/2011 3:22:00 AM
Frank is an industry whore.
-
Darrd2010 11/28/2011 3:19:00 AM
Poor Frank. Try raising a family in an industrial zone. Health effects are already happening throught out our area. Ask some folks about their breathing problems year round in Texas. This drilling procedure is so new, that it may be another 5 years before we begin to realize the long term effects. I'll bet you smoke cigarettes. No? Remember how long it took from the Marlboro man to banning smoking in public spaces?
-
Texaspainter 11/28/2011 3:11:00 AM
You know as well as I, the money is not there.
Prostitute of the industry.
-
YeahIsaidthat 11/28/2011 3:09:00 AM
Liar. Prostitute.
-
11/27/2011 7:52:00 PM
It never ceases to amaze me that people think you can extract large quantities of hydrocarbons from deep below ground without there being some sort of environmental consequences.
-
11/27/2011 6:10:00 AM
No, Frank. The City can make rules to "protect" the citizens from harm. The pollution released by the shale gas drilling is just one of the very harmful effects. Health and enjoyment of your home should trump any amount of money. The gas operators swooped in and handed out money to municipalities, churches and school boards, bought their silence and helped write the Ordinances that "encouraged" drilling.
-
11/27/2011 5:46:00 AM
That's funny. Clearly, a college "English" lit teacher with such disdain for a community that has managed to keep shale gas drilling "out," is an English teacher who doesn't keep up with the latest information about all of it. Learning should be a life-long process. Especially for educators. Paradise has many definitions. In the Barnett Shale, "Paradise" is a city that isn't built-out with pad sites. It's a city that doesn't have its citizens living down-wind of multiple pad sites or even one pad site housing the multiple produced water tanks for holding the poisonous water that comes back up from the fracking and must then be periodically "vented" onsite or these tanks will explode; or within a few hundred feet of compressor stations; or surrounded by gas gathering pipelines that criss-cross the community to get the gas to market...which now means it's going overseas as Liquid Natural Gas. Ah, Paradise.
-
Flower Mound Resident 11/27/2011 5:23:00 AM
Urban gas drilling is exploitation at its best. At an all-time market low, O&G gets to pay the mineral rights owner a pittance while exporting LNG at 3-4 times the US cost. They get to use our roads and tap into Atmos conveniently, while residents suffer the pain.
Way to go to Kim Davis (I too am a conservative, far-to-the-right Republican, but care more about the environment than money or politics); Auland, Diane Harris, et. Al. Of S.T.A.N.D.
-
11/27/2011 4:54:00 AM
Nothing negatively has happened? Actually, there have been numerous violations near Tarrant County College site this summer ~ that we know about. Or didn't you hear about Chesapeake trucking Arlington water from a fire hydrant at the Sublett and 360 pad site to the Harvey site in Grand Prairie? You didn't know? There were likely other incidences that weren't caught on camera. So, pay attention, Frank. They were caught by a citizen. Grand Prairie was under water restrictions that included no drilling and no fracking. Even being in a severe drought didn't seem to matter to Arlington or Fort Worth. It's clear that you may be trapped in 2007 ~ when the gas operators moved in to spread their good cheer to neighborhoods and Tommy Lee Jones encouraged everyone to "get on board." Well, it's 2011, Frank, and people are finally starting to realize that turning our neighborhoods into industrial zones was never part of that "get on board," discussion.
-
11/27/2011 12:43:00 AM
There you go again. Frear tactics. There is less carcinogens produced by drilling a gas well than produced by cars driving up and down the streets, or by all the thousands of Southlake residents having their lawns sprayed for insects, or spraying herbicides. The truth is the people of Southlake have a right to drill on their property if they want. The city could stand to make millions of dollars in revenue if drilling was allowed. We have high enough taxes already. Driling is a win win proposition for Southlake residents. Our schools would benefit tremendously with the revenue generated.
-
11/27/2011 12:34:00 AM
Oh please! Greed had nothing to do with wanting to harvest what is rightfully the land owners resources. The neighboring cities have drilled gas wells all over their cities and nothing negative has happened. That's right NO flaming water coming out of the faucets in their houses. There is a gas well drilled just immidiately west of Tarrant County College NE and you can't hardly tell it is there. I have seen scare tactics like the ones being used by those against drilling before and it is a shame that people believe those things. I am not saying nothing can happen, but if it does it will not be a major catastrophe. The residents will probably not even know anything happened. I compare the scare tactics used against drilling to be in the same catagory as the Democrats saying babies will die if we cut back aid to dependent mothers--All the while promoting abortions. HA! WHAT A JOKE.
-
Concerned in the Shale 11/26/2011 11:01:00 PM
What data? I'd like to see it. The pro-drilling crowd says that they have data, but then there is no support. Point me to a non-biased third party study about the air quality in the Barnett Shale or a comparable area and I'll concede the point. Part of the problem is that most cities did not require baselines to be taken before the drilling started, so there is no basis for comparison.
-
11/26/2011 3:47:00 PM
Let's not forget that one site was approved in Southlake (under very questionable circumstances that residents legally challenged) The second site was not approved by a super-majority vote, meaning the vote was 5 councilmembers in favor 2 opposed. Those 2 councilmembers have taken the heat and have been threatened by those who were blinded by greed and a few paltry royalty dollars. XTO ultimately made the "financial decision" to leave Southlake because it wasn't worth it to drill one site. Simply put: XTO is a corporation concerned most with their bottom line...NOT being the "good neighbor" their ads like to exclaim.
-
11/26/2011 8:39:00 AM
close. i am a college english lit teacher.
since southlake is not a suburb of my city, i actually have no interest in whether it fracks or does not frack. just a natural revulsion to emotional 'experts,' overly self-focused, all-anglo residents of traffic-clogged former farmland, now filled with bloated houses, surrounded by shopping, whose culture center is a high school football stadium.
enjoy your paradise.
-
11/25/2011 9:25:00 PM
Interesting. You must be with the industry. Sounds like a whole lotta sour grapes that there are no "easy" avenues for drilling and fracking in Southlake.
Blaming the city for not having apartments as being some kind of "snobbery," and as being "sanctimonious." It's probably one of the main reasons there is NO fracking and drilling there. Apartment developers are some of the first landowners to lease the minerals...as we've discovered elsewhere.
Southlake, TX has every right to build out their city as they wish...all home rule cities have that power.
Roadblocks for this massive shale gas drilling campaign are always more than welcome in the Barnett Shale since we all drink the same water and we all breathe the same air.
-
11/25/2011 7:35:00 PM
and we all know that the residents of southlake, 'who understand all,' deny apartments out of compassion for the renters, 'who may not know,' own good. add 'sanctimonious' to the above description.
-
Concerned in the Shale 11/25/2011 4:12:00 PM
Colleyville already stuck it to south Southlake. They allowed Titan to drill near the border of the two cities without requiring the same safety measures that Southlake would require. I think that most folks in Southlake would have been comfortable (or at least more so) if the nat gas industry would have agreed to safeguards, like vapor recovery and real time air monitoring. You can blame the nat gas companies for this because they would not agree to the most minimal of protections and assurances. Asking for drillers to drill in a responsible manner is not ridiculous, it is good governance. If nat gas will go where cities do not care to protect themselves, then so be it. Money without health is not worth a whole lot.
-
11/25/2011 6:58:00 AM
The shale gas industry loves to drill and frack near apartment communities. They sign the mineral leases with the apartment owners who don't live near the industrial activity. The apartment renters may not know about the carcinogens in the air. They certainly won't be told about any of it. I'm certain that those living in Southlake who understand all of this wouldn't wish it on any community.
-
11/25/2011 6:52:00 AM
Don't think so. "Get the Frack Out of Here."
-
11/25/2011 6:47:00 AM
I think the entire concept of it is amazing. A smart City Staff fashioned a very strong ordinance with 1,000 foot setbacks early on. Brilliant.
-
11/25/2011 6:43:00 AM
It is not hypocritical to understand that this activity ~ drilling, fracking, compressor stations, gas gathering pipelines, all the infrastructure necessary to operate a shale gas industrial plant in our neighborhoods ~ is wrong. Shale gas drilling and fracking are wrong everywhere since all of it is creating major issues for our environment and the earth. We need to get off this fossil fuel train as soon as possible.
-
11/25/2011 6:36:00 AM
This issue is not about a party affiliation. Citizens who have educated themselves about this environmental and health disaster are from every political stripe. The Oil and Gas Industry pays out a lot of money for politicians to remain silent about it. There's the problem. We really do need campaign finance reform. Term limits for TX governor would help, too. This governor controls too much in our state government since he's be there so long. And he gets the big bucks from Oil and Gas, of course.
-
11/25/2011 6:20:00 AM
Dicole: 20 years? Slick water, hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells in shale formations (like the Barnett Shale) has only been viable since 2006. Multiple wells on pad sites since 2007. That's about 5 years. (Google Dr. Anthony Ingraffea's December 16, 2010 Lecture or any of his lectures to get the lowdown on all of this. Dr. Ingraffea worked for Shlumberger (http://www.slb.com/) in the early years of developing the "fracking technology" and he has a very different picture to share than you have shared.)
Being in this business for 20 years does not qualify you to tell communities what they should do. Cities develop neighborhoods and neighborhoods bring homeowners together to live together often with deed restrictions and homeowners associations. For this industry to swoop in, as it did in North Texas communities, round up people to "get on board," and then claim that mineral development is critical to our national security and economic development....without mentioning anything about the process (except to say that no one will ever notice they are drilling since it will be so far away)...it is ALL a major failure of municipalities and our state for not demanding more information up front. Many of us are sick and tired of the lies and deception of this industry. And our cities for taking the money and not using their power to protect their citizens from an industry that clearly knows how to use every trick in the book to get what it wants.
Now we know that the gas operators are exporting the shale gas to China and other countries. (http://www.texassharon.com/2011/11/10/lng-to-china-the-real-reason-fracking-psyops-is-necessary/).
-
anonymous 11/25/2011 6:13:00 AM
southlake does not allow apartments either. a silly, snobbish, sterile surburb that thinks cities take it seriously.
-
Rangers100 11/25/2011 4:00:00 AM
Seriously. Southlake: the entire concept of it is just gross.
-
Rangers100 11/25/2011 3:58:00 AM
Fled the city for sprawl and ended up fracked. Boo hoo.
-
Dlcole 11/25/2011 3:33:00 AM
Lady, having worked in the Industry for 20 years, you are full of it. There are most likely existing pipelines closeby that have a great potential of causing you problems than the highly regulated Barnett plays. You are your high and mighty neighbors just screwed Southlike of Million$$$ of dollars of royalties and taxes. GOOD FOR YOU.
-
Dlcole 11/25/2011 3:28:00 AM
Sounds like Southlake screwed the pooch and most of it's citizens...Oh well. we'll just produce it from Hurst and Colleyville with paying you one cent.
-
11/25/2011 2:45:00 AM
you need a drill rig right next to your house and a compressor station and let your kids breathe it in and have your water be affected and then have to deal with that.
-
11/25/2011 2:41:00 AM
Good, inspiring story showing what people networking and working together can do-- they can keep the drillers out and keep their bit of "heaven" intact. This is good for us in Pa. to hear and realize that we can kick them out if we can organize and focus as a group.
-
11/25/2011 2:09:00 AM
I live in Arlington TX and am downwind from the 22 gas wells on campus at UTA. All is NOT well there.
First of all during production, a resident living within 600 feet had her carbon monoxide detector keep going off and she doesn't have gas hooked up to her home. Then her doctor sent TCEQ a letter stating a medical opinion that the lady's illnesses were a direct relationship to all the hydrocarbon activity nearby.
There was a fluid spill and produced water? was rushing across the street into johnson Creek a couple of years ago. Days after, the EPA came out and took this video ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiJ_zDvU9tU
There are the UTA invisible VOC's that only an infrared camera can see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p-G36wAONc
Then I have emails where the driller Carrizo is not responding to my questions about the site.
Then there was the time during a ice event in Feb of 2009 when my son was outside playing in the snow. I believe a cooling inversion pushed down the pollution to him. Hours later my son's eyes were dilated, he was lethargic, had headaches, nausea, dizziness and this lasted for ten days. His doctor said he was exposed to something, but because I did not know to get him BTEX tested, we'll never know. And one day if he gets cancer or leukemia, I'll always wonder if that event or the long term living downwind from 22 urban gas wells sickened him.
I myself am having health effects. I am under the care of Dr Lewis Cone, a nutritionist who is prescribing me detoxing meds as my joints ache. Years ago when the first wells were in production, I kept grinding my teeth and clenching my jar and feeling nervous and like I had to run around the block.
Just months ago, my right eye finally stopped twitching and this lasted about six months.
One time my son and I both had shoulder muscle twitching at the same time. Now my husband is complaining of an achy shoulder.
A few months ago I drove by an recorded an emission event there... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjIVpC8recQ&feature=related
These wells are now aging and TCEQ told me that a lift compressor was added to help with the production. Compressors =formaldehyde in our airshed. A few days ago, I took a UTA "well work over" video where this white stuff was wafting over to the UTA dorm just south of the site. Since TCEQ doesn't test for chemicals used in a well rework, I admitted to them that they would come out and test and what they test for would not show exceedances. The last time I called them, they came out to a different site in Dalworthington Gardens (across from Camp Thurman). Their inspector took a Toxic Vapor Analyzer reading of 122,900 ppb, YET the suma tests came back as no violations. TCEQ doesn't test for carbon disulfide, formaldehyde, the amines, & methane to name a few. We will never know what sickened the TCEQ rep and he no longer works there. He was one of the best investigators they had is what an independent environmental testing company spokesperson, Dr Alisa Rich told me.
The city water departments in the DFW area likewise have not changed what they screen for since they have allowed urban drilling. It is a shame to drill and NOT test for drilling effluents in the air, soil or water.
By design, apathy, or stupidity, our local and state government avoids detection of effluents that should be fixed, but the industry and the political system doesn't want to know if there are issues. Folks wonder why there is so much distrust. What will only worsen is the accounts of illnesses (wow check out folks near Lake Arlington-leukemia cluster?). I personally know of people whose chickens, cats, dogs and goats that have died who are near drilling. Please visit the youtube video entitled "Fracking: The Dirty Truth in North Dakota" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN_YwQp4pzY
-
11/24/2011 11:51:00 PM
"I am a scientist and prefer to form conclusions based on that thing called "data.""
Yes, we know so well these companies are more than willing to release all that data, nor would they ever require a plaintiff to sign a nondisclosure agreement in return for paid medical treatment due to their "environmentally safe" drilling practices.
Yeah, you sound very scientific, more like some Phillip Morris-type spokesperson. Anybody who moves their family and kids near these facilities has half a brain.
"To all the idiotic bleeding heart tree huggers, groundwater supplies in the Eagle Ford region have naturally-occuring levels of methane."
The issue is whether the industry is increasing those levels, not whether methane ever occurs naturally.
-
WahWahWah 11/24/2011 2:20:00 PM
Moronic article...waste of paper. Taking the point of view of a bunch of tight-sphinctered suburbanites is pretty lame. Anyone with half a brain can see that the Gasland movie is a bunch of hogwash. (FYI, I am a scientist and prefer to form conclusions based on that thing called "data.") Studies have shown that it is highly unlikely that fracking in this region will contaminate groundwater used as drinking water. And all the air studies have shown that the emissions aren't toxic, even the studies that collected air samples NEXT TO PROCESSING FACILITIES. Southlake is nothing more than a case of NIMBY. The biggest health hazard in this region stems from emissions from the millions of vehicles. Wah, wah, wah.
P.S. To all the idiotic bleeding heart tree huggers, groundwater supplies in the Eagle Ford region have naturally-occuring levels of methane.
-
11/24/2011 4:00:00 AM
Blame your greedy city council on up to your Congressmen in DC for turning a blind eye on all this. They had their palms greased good. Companies don't have to reveal any of the chemicals in their fracking methods because politicians allow them to hide behind the intellectual property laws.
-
11/24/2011 3:45:00 AM
Gas drilling is just the nastiest fucking thing to hit this country but it's a windfall for the Oil & Gas Industry and the "Race for the Cure" Industry. If you allow it in your community, the only people that will buy your house are those in the Meth Lab Industry, which is more environmentally friendly by comparison. Check out "Gasland" at your library or nearest video store if you want to learn all about this.
-
11/24/2011 2:19:00 AM
NIMBYs using the guberment they incessantly bitch about to regulate gas drilling. What a bunch of fracking hypocrites.
-
11/24/2011 12:02:00 AM
Southlake sister city to Gomorrah. Makes me want to cry (crocodile tears).
-
jentingting 11/23/2011 10:35:00 PM
Nice that rich, educated folks are able to protect themselves and their families. Sadly that wasn't the case here in Fort Worth. It (pretty much) always smells like chemicals and gas in the air here. Fort Worth, Texas: Breathe shallow y'all.
-
11/23/2011 9:18:00 PM
So, you all agree with the Republicans that government regulation is bad. Well, maybe not for fracking, but for all that other stuff. Regulations have been developed because there were concerns about how things were being done or would be done without regulation. Yes, regulations need to be periodically reviewed to see whether they are effective and serving a useful purpose. However, most of them exist for a valid reason. The greedy in our society don't care about the impacts of their actions.
-
11/23/2011 8:19:00 PM
Southlake, what a Republican cesspool, but it is amazing that all the conservative pro-business whores in Southlake didn't sign their children away along with their environment. I wonder how many people employed by the natural gas industry live in Southlake, cuz' you know the natural gas big wigs don't settle their families and live next to a well head for twenty years like they expect us poor, powerless folks to do.