The North Dallas Plot to Take Over DISD

Rich, white, North Dallas businessmen are plotting to take over Dallas' schools. Maybe this time it'll work.

The top four individual donors to the PACs, all white, contributed more than half the quarter-million dollars. They are, in order of their generosity, Ken Barth, a technology magnate; Harlan Crow, the international real estate magnate sometimes associated with conservative politics; Daniel Muzquiz, a venture capitalist; and Container Store founder and serial entrepreneur Garrett Boone, sometimes associated with liberal politics.

Why do they give a damn? None of them is involved in school district contracting. They certainly don't fit the demographic mold.

Of the 150,000-plus students in the Dallas Independent School District, according to state records, 87.1 percent are economically disadvantaged, 4.6 percent are white, 25 percent are black, 68.2 percent are Hispanic and only 14 percent of those who graduate from high school are ready for college in both English language arts and mathematics.

The two PACs, together with a new communitywide volunteer effort called Commit!, are part of a citywide reform movement loosely affiliated with a national movement sometimes described as "collaborative impact," aimed at coordinating and streamlining disparate do-good efforts to improve education.

The core of it is called "cradle to graduation," a concept that calls for diverse philanthropic entities to integrate and stage their resources in order to focus on student success from birth until college admission.

But that begs the question of why. A year after the district had to call off its board elections because no one gave enough of a damn to run, why do 11 of the city's most affluent ZIP codes suddenly cough up a quarter-million bucks to influence school board decisions?

School board member Michael Morath, a champion of the reform movement, goes straight for the most idealistic explanation: "We as a species would not have survived if we didn't fundamentally care about our young collectively. It is part of human nature that we do actively love children. You can say it's wired into us, you can say it's God-given, but it's there. Otherwise we would have died a long time ago."

So we are asked to believe that a bunch of wealthy white people woke up in the middle of the night and decided to start pouring their money into the Dallas public schools out of the goodness of their hearts?

Yes. On the one hand, it sounds preposterous. On the other hand, what if it were true? What if it were even half true? A quarter true?


The very suggestion of affluent white people wanting to do the right thing by urban public schools pushes a very angry button in the veteran education warriors — the high-seniority activists who have learned over the years to mistrust just such assertions.

Black community activist Joyce Foreman gets along great with white people most of the time. Quick-witted and business-sophisticated, she bridged gaps, formed alliances and earned credibility with white suburban colleagues as a member of the board of directors of Dallas Area Rapid Transit from 2002 to 2008.

But two big buttons got pushed for her earlier this year when DISD trustees, including Nutall, voted to close those schools in her community. At the same moment, Uplift Education, a charter school organization in Dallas, blundered into a brief but colorful zoning dispute over a school site Uplift had purchased in a neighborhood of bars. It didn't help that someone at City Hall surreptitiously slipped into a City Council agenda a measure to allow Uplift to use tax-exempt bonds to build more schools, in one of those not-quite-tricky-enough moves that always winds up making everybody crazy.

For Foreman, it was game on. She saw a pincer movement to shut down DISD schools and give the money instead to charters so they could snap up more real estate and skim easy-to-teach top students out of the district, leaving the truly challenged students behind to rot.

I asked her why anybody would want to do that.

"To continue to have an illiterate workforce that will work for menial pay," she said, "and who will not question the system."

That's a remarkably dark accusation. Foreman believes there are people in this city who would deform the minds of children in order to keep them in peonage.

"I believe that there are good people of all races," Foreman says. "Don't get me wrong. But if you just start looking at these do-gooders, who are all Park Cities people, wanting to come back here and just shower all of this good on DISD, it just baffles me."

The idea that rich white people would work deliberately to diminish the lives of black children — would pretend to do good while conspiring to do evil — is not unique to black Dallas. It reflects centuries of our national history, where, as a matter of fact, that happened.

James Tucker, publisher of the only black newspaper in Colorado Springs, Colorado, is involved in a dispute with Mike Miles, a school superintendent there who is about to take over leadership of DISD. Tucker believes Miles is in league with people whose deliberate aim is to prevent black students from becoming educated.

Tucker doesn't believe, as Foreman does, that rich white people would deliberately keep black kids uneducated in order to employ them in menial jobs. He believes white people want to keep black children in prison as slaves.

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
24 comments
Jboyer
Jboyer

There are many problems with our educational system but the worst is the way we educate our children. Back in the "olden days" when students attended a one room school house literacy rates were 95%. Home schooled children probably get the best education but not every one can do that. Montessori students have a 95% graduation rate and 88% go on to higher education. Wikipedia, Ebay, Facebook, Google were all founded by people w/ montessori educations. Given those stats vs the stats of traditional schools I can't believe the system wasn't overhauled years ago. Why do we continue to waste our time on traditional schools that were set up over half a century ago and have proved to be ineffective decade after decade. Until we change the way we educate we are just wasting resources on a system that will never work. Jboyer

Cesar39nt
Cesar39nt

UNFORTUNATELY, our citizens{white,well educated,stupid as all hell, and looking for worthless bridges to buy} will never see past these criminals in good suits, they keep piling into texas making us look like the hub of criminal activity in the southwest makes me ashamed to be white, but at least i see it and im not ignorant enough to cast my votes for those guys, mike rawlins, you bought the mayors office and i hope you get the same as your cohort john wilkey price

John_silencer
John_silencer

Just as I thought the sharks smell money. the predators are coming --charter schools

John_silencer
John_silencer

As I read this article it briings to mind Bain Capital. In the business world of DISD there is plenty of money laying around and all you have to do to raid it is to sdtick a few lenient rules or lines in the agenda and that person is in for the big bucks. Right now to get thsoe bucks just create another line of charter schools and shut down a few more schools and you have the dollars walking ithrough the doors of thsoe charter schools. so you have to kleep your eye onm Mr Weasel and also the chicken house or the chickens get eaten and you end up with no chickens, in otherwords the students are outsourced to a charter school

Been there!
Been there!

As long as the children and parents are considered "customers" when they are the ones paying, through taxes, for their own education, the outlook looks very dim. If these Great White Fathers (as we used to call W.T.White) care about education for all, then they should start with the Lege and actually support two- year colleges, smaller classes in secondary schools, etc. I perceive one huge flaw in all of this "Commit" stuff: this is not the Jr. league, and it is not a business. Joyce Foreman is right and Dallas should prove her wrong by demonstrating that we do want parents and children in public schools to care that all participating in the world of education become critical thinkers. This all reminds me of the current ads being pushed by EXXON whee they tout their funding of science education while simultaneously funding their opposing of climate change! Weird, but typical.

Bbetzen
Bbetzen

A more troubling side of DISD is reflected in the most recent version 4.1 of the DISD budget. A one page spreadsheet at http://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2012/06/dallas-isd-2012-13-budget-moving.html shows the correlation between student/teacher ratios in DISD high schools and how they generally go up, with more students per teacher, as the poverty level for the students in a school go up. This data comes directly from the 669 page DISD budget available online. This is nothing new, but it is sad to see this correlation continuing. If this bothers you, come to one of the budget meetings happening all over Dallas this evening.

Paul
Paul

I pretty much stopped at the opening line of "... was a successful fund manager at Goldman Sachs." What does "successful" mean at Goldman Sachs? Made money for the clients; or, generated lots of fees for Goldman Sachs? Why "was a successful fund manager", did he get canned for not being "successful"? Remember, this guy comes from a company that was at ground zero for the financial meltdown. This was the company that had no problem packaging up "far below subprime mortgages" presenting them as investment grade securities and then turning around and shorting the very same product. Do we really want someone from a company like Goldman Sachs to be within reach of the $1+ billion dollar DISD budget? Children will not excel and succeed academically at DISD until their parents light a fire underneath them. If children are not guided by their parents to excel in their education, they will not. There is an entry in the Unfair Park blog about "asian" children being successful academically. The reason why is that their parents place a premium on academic success and make sure that their children realize that. Get ready for another round of money wasting, race baiting, and payoffs ...

Cares About Kids
Cares About Kids

It's all about governance and getting a board that puts the interests of kids first in every decision vs. acting as a "jobs and spread the contract dollars around program". That's why people are screaming...because Miles is saying he is not afraid to create heavy turnover to get the right people in the right seats vs. hiring based on race or who you know. Only a kids first board will support those actions, and to get quality people to run you need to raise money so they don't feel all they are doing is asking for money which most people of integrity (who have no intention of paying favors later if elected) hate to do.

Downndallas
Downndallas

CAK, I hope you're right about Miles, and I do hope he will bring in fresh new faces who will put the needs of the children first. I get really upset when I see the same faces appointed/transferred/promoted to new boards due to cronyism, but those same people have miserably failed in their previous endeavors. Also, you're right- a "kids first" objective should be first and foremost with all involved, but we know that's not exactly the case in a lot of circumstances which is part of the reason why we're in the mess we're in today. It's unfortunate that so much money is needed in all elections whether federal, state, or local. The influence of money in this country will be our downfall.

Downndallas
Downndallas

As a taxpayer in DISD, I'm not sure what to think about this endeavor. On one hand, DISD is a mess and this District hasn't been able to improve their/our situation at all. Money has been embezzled and misused for years, while our kids have continued to struggle and suffer. So, the current status-quo is unacceptable. Now, we have wealthy North Dallas "businessmen" showing an interest in our children, or is this just another endeavor to try to rid the state of the public educational system, or some other right-wing conspiracy/agenda??? If this were any state other than Texas, I probably wouldn't be so suspicious of these wealthy white men, but this is the state that has re-elected a governor time and time again, that is notoriously anti-public education. Who's to say that this isn't just another "conservative" group with the same agenda??? Also, is money truly the ONLY problem with DISD??? I don't think so. The problems with DISD is the lack of parenting, kids who aren't motivated to learn, bad teachers (not all, but there are quite a few), and a corrupt administration. Throwing more money at these problems isn't going to help. However, I do feel that a grassroots effort such as the Commit! organization shows some promise. So, perhaps the North Dallas businessmen and Commit! should get together because it's going to take a community based effort to correct this catastrophic school system.

Cares About Kids
Cares About Kids

You have zero clue on what you are talking about...these guys are spending tens to hundreds of thousands (in Williams case literally millions) of their own money with zero ability or desire to participate in DISD contracts...for the most part they live in Dallas and pay DISD taxes except for Crow, so this isn't about making Highland Park real estate more valuable because of its schools...if DISD schools don't do well, their property values go down. All of these bloggers say follow the money, but the only money I see is flowing out of their pockets with no dollars in return. Only in a district as dysfunctional as DISD can some be vilified for giving a shit and putting their money where their mouth is while the cynical cranks in the popcorn section complain while offering zero solutions other than the status quo. They want to fire Miles and he hasn't even officially started yet. Wake up people!!!

Guest
Guest

Not that hard to figure the new game out, Jim. Rich white folks are down trolling for money out of the Dallas ISD budget, same as it ever was. The few hundred thousands you are drooling about is just chump change bait to set up the game. Same as ever, when there is some Billion Dollar$ all piled up together, it draws sharks, just like blood in the water. They need to buy influence, so that will go through with higher admin salaries and reduced pay for bottom end teachers -- ensuring a crap product for the bottom end kids. Have to keep in mind, you cannot have a Plantation Nation model with a Big House if you do not create the contrasting Slave Quarters. It is creating the crap end that makes the Top End premium. New game will be Charters in the Top End side of things. While many of the Charters on the South Side have been sort of crap, that will not be the game on the Top Side. New charters on the North Side will be sold as College Prep, with limited admissions. Do the money math on this, and you will see the Cash Flow.

Mustardseed
Mustardseed

They still can't say what the hell reform is - how is this a good article? Its nothing but crap - shame on you Jim - you are sitting on real journalism and refuse to write it.

Ck
Ck

yes miles please leave..

Bbetzen
Bbetzen

Marcus, school choice is not a solution. It is short term at best. Why allow schools that people would want to move their children out of? The complaints must be encouraged at the school level so the problems can be fixed. Demanding parents are the best resource there is for good education. Every school needs them. When they are neutralized by school choice you have removed the best resource for true school reform. We must value demanding parents, but too many schools in DISD don't. Drive up to any public school. If the parking places closest to the front door are for the staff, then you have a school that does not really invite parents in based on such "body language." If the school has the 10 spaces closest to the door designated for visitors, then you have a school that encourages parental envolvement. It is a different atmosphere.

Bbetzen
Bbetzen

If my memory of the reporting and fighting that went on in the press 16 years ago is correct, DISD and Dallas have come a long way. Is this real progress? Statistically it is! As recently as the DISD Class of 2007 almost 60% of the full enrollment of that original 9th grade enrollment for the Class of 2007 was missing at graduation - AKA dropouts. Then within 4 years, with the Class of 2011, that dropout calculation was less than 48% for the first time in well over 16 years in DISD! The Class of 2011 set graduation rate records, even with all the testing! DISD is making very real progress. Since 2005 the 9th grade bulge has virtually disappeared. One third of the 9th grade is no longer repeating the 9th grade at least once. That is a major achievement!! It used to be that most DISD dropouts never made it to the 10th grade. Now DISD has the highest 10th, 11th and 12th grade enrollments in years. While all this progress is happening we are NOT going backwards with SAT and ACT scores. We are not seeing real progress, but we are not going backwards either as the graduation rates rise. See http://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2012/05/dallas-isd-academic-graduation-rate.html The Class of 2012 should set another graduation rate record with the largest graduation class in decades. Now we need to work on getting higher SAT/ACT scores while we continue to get higher graduation rates. Motivation is the issue. We must more actively focus our students onto their own futures. We must make the future real. It can be done! Paying more attention to what is happening in DISD is the best investment possible for the future of Dallas. We are now finally, since 2005, seeing REAL progress! Just look at the charts linked above, and the SAT/ACT scores. We have a LONG way to go, but DISD has not been going backwards at all. All the data points to real progress, year after year since 2005. That progress needs to become normal as we focus more and more on the data every year. The DISD web site should have an ongoing spreadsheet online similar to the one at http://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2012/05/dallas-isd-academic-graduation-rate.html so as to allow an "official" tracking of DISD data over the years. The public will then know constantly how DISD is doing. Much of that data is now on the DISD web site, but it is not easy to locate.

Marcus D Cunningham
Marcus D Cunningham

The issue I have with these groups is twofold: 1) They refer to this new paradigm of school reform, one that is supposedly proven. If no one can accurately define the reform they're seeking, how is it proven? I have not seen one example of transforming public schools that is purely focused on mass-educating an inner-city population. Eventually it always comes back to school choice. 2) The only concrete plan for these reforms I got from the article is rooting out the bad teachers. Why are we so convinced that teachers are at fault? There's no union, so you can't blame them. After you take away most of the teaching experience out of the district, what happens then? Fill the schools with TFA? (this coming from someone who supports the org) Let's develop a credible measure for teacher impact before we decide which we should and shouldn't dump. I think there's reason to be suspicious of any groups who take a sudden interest in turning around education. However, I'll be happy to listen if they can provide actual plans that don't involve siphoning off the best students.

Marcus D Cunningham
Marcus D Cunningham

Its actually the opposite...HP's district is superior because of those high home vales. Funding is probably the biggest factor to district success.

asu87
asu87

it's probably a bit of chicken or the egg theory---but knowing what happens to your home value when you live across a district line is very interesting. At one time I lived across a creek that separated disd from plano isd...my disd based home took 6 months longer to sell than average and eventually brought much less than market value...all prospects on the home with children sited disd as a major issue. education is very important to parents, they will spend money on private school to make certain that their kids get the best...if disd delivered "the best" this would be a positive and more money would roll in from increased home values. problem is---disd is not very good in most cases. I believe it comes down to organization of the schools, not just money to the teachers.

Guest
Guest

Complete garbage. You've been hanging out with Joyce Foreman, whose primary skill (when she's not dreaming up similarly lunatic conspiracy theories) seems to be backing candidates in elections that always seem to lose.

stephen
stephen

they (the white, rich establishment) want to privatize public schools...it's not about helping disadvantaged kids...they could care less about that in reality, it's about doing away with Robin Hood and then doing away with public education. If you don't educate people, it's easier to to force them to work in menial jobs and keep them in their place...

Joe L
Joe L

I'd be inclined to question their judgment if they are white and can afford to send their kids and grandkids some where else, but send them to DISD. There is hostility to whites in the DISD as is evidenced in the racial sparring reflected here.

Poster Atat
Poster Atat

Aren't the Black Panthers a violent threatening racist group? Shouldn't that be illegal?

 
Loading...