The Rise of the Texas Atheist

With help from a former church boy from Dallas, the state's "nones" are getting organized and going public.

About a dozen DFWCoR members soon showed up and picked greens for several hours. Then they sent the pictures to the media.

Barely a month later, DFWCoR followed up with another media blitz, dubbed "Our Families Are Great Without Religion." It showed smiling pictures of families looking cheerful and un-Hell-bound. A planned billboard along Interstate 30 went up on schedule. The atheists also signed a contract with the Arlington location of Movie Tavern, paying around $3,000 for a six-month contract to show an ad before movie trailers.

But their godlessness foiled them again. Movie Tavern abruptly backed out of the agreement. "We have never in the history of Movie Tavern run an ad of a religious nature, and we never will," a spokesperson said at the time.

Zach Moore is the non-spiritual leader of Dallas' growing atheist movement.
Mark Graham
Zach Moore is the non-spiritual leader of Dallas' growing atheist movement.
David Stokes, a "street preacher" from Houston, entertains the convention-goers with his fire and brimstone exclamations.
Anna Merlan
David Stokes, a "street preacher" from Houston, entertains the convention-goers with his fire and brimstone exclamations.

Details

Email the author at anna.merlan@dallasobserver.com.

When Movie Tavern backed out, another theater, the Plano Angelika, agreed to run the ads, Moore said. "It's an Easter miracle!" he said in an interview. But the day after those words were printed, the Angelika claimed they had been deluged with angry phone calls. They refused to run the ad, too.


It's Sunday morning, a few weeks after the convention, and Zach Moore is heading to church. He's been invited to speak to a Sunday school class for adults and teens at Trinity Harbor Presbyterian in Rockwall. He's wearing a corduroy coat and jeans and looks right at home.

"I've never met a Christian I didn't like," Moore tells the parishioners when he arrives, his hands folded in his lap. That said, he adds, "I appreciate the opportunity to come here and tell you that all your most cherished beliefs are untrue." He smiles. A few people laugh uncomfortably. Most don't.

Moore speaks at churches fairly often; it's part of his mission to make atheists more visible. His other, arguably more challenging, goal is to make them more cohesive as a group.

To explain why that's necessary, he points back at the Pew poll from this year, showing the rise of "unaffiliated" Americans. "It's definitely encouraging to see that this trend is continuing, and especially so that it's even more pronounced in the millennial generation," he explains in an email. "I think the religious in this country know they have a serious demographic problem on their hands, but I think they're incapable of solving it."

That said, "It's also a bit concerning, because religious institutions do provide social support and community, as well as facilitate tremendous charitable initiatives. Those who leave a religious community lose much of that."

Moore and DFWCoR have been instrumental in organizing those "charitable initiatives" for DFW's atheists. A group of DFWCoR member groups recently sent teams to Light the Night, a walk raising money for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. The Fellowship of Freethought also adopted a stretch of Northwest Highway, which they clean every other month. They do the same with the shoreline of White Rock Lake. They also offer "Secular Sunday School" programs for children, along with Camp Quest, a weeklong summer camp for the children of atheist families.

Atheist groups and activities like these are badly needed throughout the South to convince non-believers that they're not alone, and to lend them a sense of community and purpose, says Elizabeth Cornwell, director of the Richard Dawkins Foundation. When Dawkins tours the United States on his frequent speaking engagements, the Bible Belt is where they get the best turnout.

"People feel beleaguered," Cornwell says. "The best thing is for people to be able to see one another." She's especially encouraged by atheists in Texas. "There seems to be a great deal of activism and organization here."

The lingering question is what non-religious communities should look like, and what role atheist groups should play in their members' day-to-day lives. There seems to be uncertainty or disagreement among them, about whether these groups should take the place of a religious organization or should look as little like one as possible.

The subject comes up during a Fellowship of Freethought board meeting, held in a tiny room at a Dallas community center. The windowless space is crammed with eight board members, about 15 people in the audience and two roaming, very bored toddlers, the children of board members.

"We all get isolated," says a guy named Chad. "My brother runs the soundboard at his church. My mother cleans hers. It's church in, church out."

This group also holds regular Sunday gatherings, ones that can feel, ironically, pretty churchy: music, speakers, rows of chairs.

That shouldn't turn people off, says Tim Brewer, a former youth pastor and preacher's son. He leads the local chapter of Recovering From Religion, a nationwide nonprofit that tries to help once-religious people ease their transition into non-belief. "Fellowship, music, getting to know people, becoming a better person — these are things we all need," he says. "Christianity doesn't have a monopoly on live music." After leaving the church, he says, he "fell into nihilism and loneliness" for a time. "Until I discovered Christianity doesn't have a monopoly on happiness either."

But not all atheists have come to terms with that. During the FOF meeting, they agree to immediately stop using the "pew/row formation" of chairs, to help de-church the vibe.

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
208 comments
zhorsh
zhorsh

In the context of human history there has been well over 10,000 gods throughout .When a person of faith can answer why they don't believe in the other 9,999 Plus other gods just tell them that is why I don't believe in yours

Carrie Cook
Carrie Cook

Wow, Observer.  You couldn't print one rubbutal to the anti-atheist rubbish printed this week?  Perhaps there weren't any?  Let me respond belatedly.  Most warmongers, drunks, and criminals believe in a deity, and that is because most HUMANS believe in a deity.  There is certainly no greater threat posed by atheists.  In fact, quite the opposite.  Atheists believe in the future, in protecting the environment, and in respecting all species. It is our duty to protect the earth, not sit around waiting for an apocalypse. We live and then we die, just like the great oak tree, the mighty whale, and the honey bee. We are not a 'special' animal. Yes, I'm partial to humans because I am one, and our brain is a wonder, but we're likely the most destructive, invasive species that has ever existed on this planet. This is an uncomfortable reality for all of us to live with. But I'll take reality over fantasy any day.

We believe in the natural world, not a supernatural fairy tale.  Therefore, I find the atheists I know to be the OPPOSITE of self-absorbed.  We're not some special species created by a deity that looks out for us and answers our calls.  We don't get to defy the laws of nature and live forever while everything else dies.  That would appear to be the height of self-absorption.

Montemalone
Montemalone topcommenter

"WARNING," it reads, in five-inch high orange letters. "Drunks,homosexuals, abortionist [sic], adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves,atheists, witches, idolaters, HELL AWAITS YOU."

Sign me the fuck up! If there's a room full of drunk homosexual fornicators, that's the place for me.

DOCensors
DOCensors

Oh cool.. let's turn being non-religious into an annoying religious cult. Count me out. 

Just go to church if you feel like you need to belong so badly. 

gomola
gomola

I believe that my belief in not believing in the belief of not believing is as believable as one believing in the belief of not believing but one should believe that forcing the belief of not believing is better than just not believing at all. Ergo. If an atheist fall in the woods does he make a sound? God only knows.

bizworldusa34
bizworldusa34

As bad as humans are with religion, they are worse without it. Ben Franklin observed as much in his letter.Regards Bizworldusa

bbracken677
bbracken677

We should all be aware, that in the US, we have Freedom OF Religion, not Freedom FROM Religion. 

A cornerstone of our country since it's inception has been Judeo/Christian values whether you like it or not.  

In fact, contrary to the revisionist philosophy our constitution does not provide for a separation of church and state. The passage that applies is: "Congress shall make no laws regarding the establishment of religion". Period....simply put, our federal govt cannot establish it's own religion (such as, at the time, the Church of England). This provided for Freedom of Religion. Oddly enough it leaves the door open for a state to establish it's own state religion....

Those who would argue that our founders intended it to mean a separation I have 2 questions: Why did they not just state that in the constitution (I am aware of Jefferson's musings as well as others) and why (if that was indeed the intent) did they include references to God in official documents as well as beginning govt functions with a prayer?  Oh...and why is the Supreme Court building filled with religious symbolism?  (ok..3 questions)

Do not get me wrong...personally I would prefer a separation but instead of just interpreting the constitution as we would like it to be, totally ignoring the actual words, we should put the appropriate words together, as a nation, and then pass an amendment. Taking the current approach is exactly the same as when the supreme court endorsed slavery, again, ignoring the words of the constitution. 

Pardon me for being a constitutionalist. 

If you choose to not believe...that's perfectly fine, but do not jam your non-belief down my throat.

Sotiredofitall
Sotiredofitall topcommenter

How does a pagan or deist belief system fit into all this?  

zachsmind
zachsmind

I'd like to know how Zach Moore has acquired this status of "nonspiritual leader of the Texas Atheist Movement." I'm in Texas. I am Atheist. I move around all the time. I'm not part of any official movement. I'm offended by anyone claiming all atheists in Texas are moving under some leader like we're all a bunch of pansy sheep Moonies or something. 

Atheism is NOT A FAITH! It's a doubt! I doubt your faith! That's it! Stop trying to mold us into something we're not! We are not even an us! Cut it out! 

dfwheathen
dfwheathen

Every year around the this we are bombarded with religion. This article is a breath of fresh air. I commend you for not shying away from this or twisting or perspectives. As you can tell from the comments, Texas needs to know that we are here, we are growing, and we are NOT dangerous.

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

Ra lets us know "foreign " academics laugh at our "lamentable politics". Really? which European Country has a black President with Muslim antecedents? Which Asian country would even contemplate a black man as a leader?

But then again if you give yourself a moniker like Ra , you must be a deity unto yourself (Ra was ancient Egypts sun god) (br)As for men like Stokes, well they represent themselves and not God. They speak without authority and about mysteries they are unaware of..

Then the author draws conclusions regarding the no church affiliation. No affiliation does not mean atheistFinally the modern atheist societies of say the USSR were hellish. North Korea is another prominent example of hell on earth. 

Hitler was an atheist and you may verify it by googling "You mean Hitler wasn't a priest" by David Shiflett.The Nazis killed 295 Lutheran ministers in east Germany (formally Prussia)

Authors such as Ayn Rand had a hellish view of life and some Christians have accepted this atheist's distorted view of society such as Paul Ryan

.and then we have this gem from the atheist site "Landover Baptist""Atheists are overweight. The stereotypes of typical Atheists are the trim, granola cruncher who jogs and plays racquetball or the vain hedonist, party-goer who worships only her full-length mirror, Recent studies have shown, however, that Atheists have become aware of these signifiers of their lack of faith. In order to blend in undetected with evangelical Christians, most Atheists now tend to be morbidly obese and will tell you, whether asked or not, that their enormous girth is the result of an undetectable thyroid condition and not the box of Little Debbie cakes they are holding."

After seeing Aron Ra ham it up on YouTube I have to agree. Atheists do have serious weight problems

.Let us conclude atheists have every right to protest, assemble and inveigh against religion. But like everything choices have consequences. The atheists states of the 20th century were not enlightened. In fact people who lived when atheists ruled have written such books as "Darkness at Noon"Most of the children of 20th century atheists have become Christians from Stalin's daughter Svetlana to Khrushchev's children. They were the atheist elite.From Svetlana on here conversion"It was there, in 1982, “on a cold December day, the feast of St Lucy… the decision to enter the Catholic Church came to me very naturally”, as she writes in her memoirs. This decision had been influenced by a long friendship/correspondence with an Italian Catholic priest and the support and kindness of a Catholic couple she had met in America.Svetlana writes that after her conversion “Only now I understand the wonderful grace that the Sacraments of Penance and the Holy Eucharist produce, no matter what day of the year, and even on a daily basis. Before, I was unwilling to forgive and repent, and I was never able to love my enemies. But I feel very different from before, since I attend Mass every day.The Eucharist has given me life."

I take la Dulce Vita of catholic Italy any day over the dark noon of atheism.

cbrandon60
cbrandon60

I'm not sure what bothers me the most.  The Atheist gathering to oppose Christianity, or the Christian dude waving a sign around that everyone is going to hell.  It's only by the Grace of God that any of us ever make it to heaven, and it's certainly anybody's right to not only disagree with God's teaching, but to totally denounce Him.  You see, my Christ that I follow had love and compassion for the lost.  He actually had more harsh words for the religeous zealots than He ever did for the lost. I have to wonder what would have happened if he had showed up and passed out water, sandwiches, coffee, and said nothing.  Just show love and compassion, and be there to give an answer if anyone wants to know why he did it.  That's not underhanded or sneaky, it's my Jesus' way.  We are saved through GRACE through Christ, not my posting hateful signs and yelling out in anger.  Wake up church. 

glenpearson
glenpearson

You named two wars, and they weren't started because Stalin was an Atheist. They were started because Hitler, a Roman Catholic, was to quote him 'Doing Gods, will', in eliminating the Jewish people. Notice the Jews, are no different than you and I, but Hitler felt they were less than human, because of their religion. There are 123 wars, where not only was religion the at the forefront of the conflict, but it was the main driving force, and issue.

rain391
rain391

@bbracken677  

Likewise, please don't shove your religious beliefs down my throat!

Fausta
Fausta

You need to go back and study the legislate history of the Establishment Clause. Congress considered several versions of the Establishment Clause before deciding on the most expansive version. Jefferson's phrase "Wall of Separation of Church and State" captures the legislative mood of the adopted versions of the Establishment and the Free Exercise Clauses. Jefferson's phrase is a legal term of art and the Supreme Court has explored it's meaning 15 times since 1879.

Also, the Establishment Clause has been extended to the states via the 14th Amendment and a state could no longer establish its own religion. Some religious parts of the early Texas Constitution that haven't been updated are now unconstitutional, are now just historical curiosities, and wouldn't be recognized even by a Texas State court.

Sandra Day O’Connor wrote a majority Supreme Court opinion in the 1980's that established that constitutionally acceptable religious symbols in federal and state government buildings are simply "ceremonial deism" not genuine religious worship. Basically they are just exercises to build respect for government institutions, something like the justices’ traditionally wearing black robs.

moorezw
moorezw

@zachsmind If you're not part of a movement, that's fine. But there is a movement of atheists, humanists, and freethinkers who are organizing, who have elected leaders, and are seeking recognition as part of the Texas cultural landscape.

hentai.jeff
hentai.jeff

@cedar_springs "Hitler was an atheist and you may verify it by googling "You mean Hitler wasn't a priest" by David Shiflett.The Nazis killed 295 Lutheran ministers in east Germany (formally Prussia)" So his numerous times claiming he was doing gods work and his insistence that every soldier in germany have "Gott Mitt Uns" or "God With Us" on their uniforms makes him an atheist? I never knew that my atheism made me a devout catholic.

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@cedar_springs 

Now, I'm no fan of YouTube Ra, never heard of the guy, but your snarky remarks on his weight seem quite unchristian.

Really, it's quite sunny and lovely where I am sitting. No god in sight, just this wonderfully complex universe.

snuffgod
snuffgod

IF ONLY all Christians did was wave signs around saying others are going to hell. As it is, they make and enforce laws based on their theology that are forced on everyone and they plaster their slogans even on the money everyone has to use and on the nation's official loyalty oath that children are made to say.  And a lot more.

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

@glenpearson 

Glen you need to read David Shifllets article "You mean Hitler wasn't a priest"   Hitler was biding his time to destroy Christianity.  

"Hitler was indeed a baptized Catholic, but his rejection of the faith was profound. "My pedagogy is strict," he once explained. "I want a powerful, masterly, cruel and fearless youth... There must be nothing weak or tender about them. The freedom and dignity of the wild beast must shine from their eyes... That is how I will root out a thousand years of human domestication."That domestication, of course, was in large part due to the influence of Christianity. Hitler was blunter still on other occasions. "It is through the peasantry that we shall really be able to destroy Christianity," he said in 1933, "because there is in them a true religion rooted in nature and blood." His countrymen would have to choose: "One is either a Christian or a German. You can't be both."

""In West Prussia, out of 690 parish priests, at least two-thirds were arrested, and the remainder escaped only by fleeing from their parishes. After a month's imprisonment, no less than 214 of these priests were executed... by the end of 1940 only twenty priests were left in their parishes — about three percent of the number of parish priests in the pre-war era." The toll of murdered Polish priests would rise into the thousands; their Protestant counterparts (though a much smaller group) fared no better, with many members of the clergy perishing in the camps."

research, research, research

pooua
pooua

@glenpearson Most historians and policy makers attribute Germany's drive to war to the crushing financial burden placed on it at the Treaty of Versaille. I have never seen any serious historical treatment of WW II that claimed that religion started it, except to say that exterminating some religions was a motivation in it. The fact that Stalin was engaged in war against religion is well-documented, particularly in his domestic policies. Stalin's destruction of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour was a huge scandal, but one predicted, based on Stalin's contempt for religion.

cbrandon60
cbrandon60

@glenpearson Hitler was not representative of Christ's love or of most Christians.  That is a weak claim.  Anybody can say the words.  He did, but did not walk the walk. You are correct though that facts should be correct. 

bbracken677
bbracken677

@rain391 @bbracken677  And was I doing that?  Nope...I was advocating an amendment supporting separation of church and state. I was also on a bit of a rant about our judicial system legislating from the bench. 

bbracken677
bbracken677

@Fausta  Actually...no I don't. Been there done that. You pretty much missed the whole point. 

Last I checked Jeffersonian correspondence was not part of the constitution and there is no addendum at the end of the Bill of Rights, nor the Constitution which says "see Jefferson's notes for further clarification". 

The sentence "Congress shall make no laws regarding the establishment of religion." is quite clear, concise, and understandable. There was no reason to seek further clarification by visiting Jefferson's writings (and other's) unless the meaning was not as desired. This has been precisely the case. 

Jefferson also felt that the US should remain an agricultural society and should not become industrialized....should we also take some phrase from the constitution to mean that all manufacturing industries are unconstitutional?

The Bill of Rights was written by the 1st Congress of the US. The start of every session was a prayer. (and still is)

Regarding your Sandra remark...sure...but for some reason that did not stop the ACLU from forcing the removal of a statue representing the 10 commandments from an Alabama courthouse in the 90s, now did it? Nor does that apply to Boy Scouts not being able to use a city park in San Diego due to "separation of church and state". 

Seems that we can interpret a simple sentence in the constitution or the bill of rights to mean pretty much whatever we want it to mean....

Just to give you some background, I have been researching the "Establishment Clause" since the Alabama incident...and I find the logic behind the interpretation to be disturbing. The intent is clear: It does not mean precisely what we wish it to mean, so we will interpret it our way, regardless...

Sotiredofitall
Sotiredofitall topcommenter

If there is a hell, you belong there.  As soon as possible.

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

@hentai.jeff 

did you read the srticle?  You cite Hitler saying he had God with us on the uniforms but you dont source it

I sourced my statements

Oh heres what I found out about your statement

It predates Hitler

"Gott mit uns (meaning God with us) is a phrase commonly used on armor in the German military from the German Empire to the end of the Third Reich, although its historical origins are far older. The Russian Empire's motto also translates to this.'

"Nobiscum deus ('God with us') was a battle cry of the late Roman Empire and of the Byzantine Empire, used for the first time in German by the Teutonic Order.

nice try though

oh by the way Stalin gave a stately Dacha to the primate of Moscow.  \

Even though he was a confirmed atheist he was looking to get a job as an orthodox priest  

do some research before opening your yap

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

@TheCredibleHulk @cedar_springs 

They weren't my snarky comments, they were from an atheist site. 

Loosing weight is salutary just ask the AMA.  Your bad cholesterol drops, your blood pressure drops and your sugar levels drops.

It seems a lot of atheists ignore simple biological facts.  from Christopher Hitchens to Madeleine O hare and her morbidly obese children to USSR Politburo fatties under Breznhev  who died in short order of heart attacks

"“Everything in moderation, including moderation.”  Oscar Wilde

oh and according to some physicists your complex universe may be a hologram

enjoy your game

cbrandon60
cbrandon60

@snuffgod I'm a Christian, and I have never made a law, enforced a law, put my beliefs on your money, or plastered my slogans anywhere but my personal space. I will cast my vote based on my beliefs, and you will probably do the same. If you ask me, I will tell you about my Christ. If you don't, I will love you with the love of my Christ and go on about my way. I can't save you, and I can't legislate your morality or anybody else's, only mine. I can only be who my Christ wants me to be. It is His job to save people, not mine. It is my job to attempt to exemplify Christ through my actions and words. 

You see, I know personally there is a God, and I know without a doubt I am not Him. I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I reject your inclusive charge about "they". I do find it strange that the self proclaimed atheist insist on their right to say what they want, but they want to take away my right to say what I want. You see, I am not a group, I am not a movement, I am not a government, I am not a founding father. I am me, just like you are you. I retain my rights...

cbrandon60
cbrandon60

@Sotiredofitall @cbrandon60 Or Christlike.  Have you even read the Gospels, the Great Commission.  Focus on the red words...do what they say, and watch your ministry grow. 

pooua
pooua

@cedar_springs @glenpearson According to Alan Bullock's, "Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives," which I don't have in front of me and I haven't read in several years, Hitler respected Catholicism because of, and only for, its long historical tradition and stability, its strength and durability. He had absolutely no use nor respect for Protestants, who, he said, "sweat profusely when you talk to them."

bbracken677
bbracken677

@TheCredibleHulk  Ok...how many different definitions that even remotely fit the context are there? 

When you consider how/why people came to the colonies, most involving religious freedom or to avoid religious persecution in England the meaning is rather clear. 

Granted, Jefferson was highly influential in the framing of the Bill of Rights, however it was the creation of the 1st Congress of the US as a whole...

If the intent was to "create a wall between govt and church" then why was it not worded more appropriately? Why is only one branch (Congress) mentioned? Why is it framed in such a narrow context? I can think of many ways to word it that would encompass the whole of the govt, including state govts, and extent as well. 

When you consider that our Supreme Court ruled in favor of slavery (how many times?) because they chose to "bend" meanings to suit their agenda, I find this particular one just as disturbing.  

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@bbracken677 

All depends on how you define the word "establishment", now, doesn't it?

CogitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum

@cedar_springs @tcufrog @hentai.jeff I think atheists who espouse state-sponsored atheism are few and far between. Most desire a state that is completely neutral and does not espouse any sort of religious or anti-religious stance. Many also are advocates for rationalism, or even humanism, in all aspects of life. Atheism is merely resultant of rationalism/humanism. All of those failed social experiments cited above would not have passed the humanism test by a long shot.

marcusmcspartacus
marcusmcspartacus

@godsux @cedar_springs @tcufrog @hentai.jeff

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics;

The People's Republic of China;

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea;

The Socialist Republic of Romania;

The German Democratic Republic;

Of course, in fairness, there is the as yet untried atheist utopia of Ayn Rand.

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

@tcufrog @hentai.jeff @cedar_springs 

Because atheists rant about what a perfect society we would have under atheism/  We already had atheist experiments in the 20th century.  Atheist societies were critical failures.

tcufrog
tcufrog

@hentai.jeff @cedar_springs 

While I'm no Hitler expert as a college librarian I wouldn't consider Wikipedia an authoritative subject since it is known to be wrong.  Also, why does it matter whether Hitler was an atheist or not since so many horrible things have been done in the name of religion?

surfsidetx3
surfsidetx3

@snuffgod  Mickey Mouse,  right

If you are an atheist there is no hell

whats your problem

People go to hell because they want to.  They hate God and they let Him know it.

"Our Lady showed me an abyss filled with fire to explain that this is the eternal fire," said the seer. "But she told me that hell is not fire. It is the eternal suffering of not seeing God, of being deprived of God."


ie the fire is symbolic language

"The last place we visited was a land of twilight where the only illumination was an unpleasant shade of red that reminded me of congealed blood," said this visionary, who still lives at Kibeho, seen often in deep prayer as she walks around the shrine. "The heat that rose from that world was stifling and dry -- it brushed my face like a flame, and I feared that my skin would blister and crack. I couldn't look at the countless people who populated that unhappy place because their misery and anguish pained me so greatly.




snuffgod
snuffgod

At least no one goes around insisting that Mickey Mouse is real and you'd better believe in him or roast in hell or maybe roast in this world too.  Mickey Mouse has got all the deities beat.

TheCredibleHulk
TheCredibleHulk topcommenter

@cedar_springs @TheCredibleHulk 

Pardon me, it wasn't clear in your post which words were yours and which were from the web site.

Also, I've seen more than my share of unhealthy believers, atheists haven't cornered the market on obesity by any means.

Let's look at this issue rationally for a moment: You posit that there is a God, but offer no tangible proof, other than your gut feelings and a book, written by men in ancient times and transcribed countless times over the centuries.

I posit that there is no God and offer no proof whatsoever.

What is the difference here? By definition, I have nothing to prove and the lack of evidence of your assertion just makes my position stronger, whereas, you have the burden of proof and the lack of evidence just makes your position weaker.

Also: If it is a hologram, so what?

cbrandon60
cbrandon60

@CogitoErgoSum @cbrandon60 @Sotiredofitall With all due respect, it is my right to believe in miracles, I have witnessed miracles, and I will fight for your freedom to not believe in them. Now religious dogma and superstitious crap? I don't know anything about all that. I'm sure there are churches and pastors that believe in that, but you won't find me sitting in their pew. :-) There is nothing superstitious about my Christ. He is all real to me. Thank you. 

cedar_springs
cedar_springs

@pooua @cedar_springs @glenpearson 

Hitler also praised Christianity   He still wanted to destroy it.  As for Protestants Hitlers right hand man was a Lutheran, Martin Boormann.  Goering was a Lutheran.  75% of the gestapo was Lutheran.  

Goering's second in command was Jewish as was Julius Streicher's second in command.  The two of them had it out in front of Hitler about Jews in their organizations. with Streicher losing and being put under house arrest.  

The Admiral of the Bismarck's wife was Jewish,

Dont look for rational behaviour among Nazis.  

hentai.jeff
hentai.jeff

@marcusmcspartacus blood libel is a jewish thing, catholics can't claim it. And voter support doesn't matter when the leaders of the church are constantly meeting with Hitler. It's not a false history at all, just one you don't agree with, fortunely history doesn't need you to agree with it, it just is.

marcusmcspartacus
marcusmcspartacus

@hentai.jeff @cbrandon60 @glenpearson

No it wouldn't. The communities with highest concentrations of Catholics showed the lowest voter support for the Nazis. This is false history and blood libel you are peddling.

 
Loading...