More Arguing Over Viability of Hypothetical Dallas-Houston High-Speed Rail Link
Earlier this month, Harvard economic pro Ed Glaeser wrote a series of pieces for The New York Times's Economix blog in which he argued that a high-speed rail line between Dallas and Houston wouldn't be economically viable. (Keep in mind, this was all hypothetical, since the Obama administration's "Vision of High-Speed Rail in America," proposed in April, doesn't actually include a link between Houston and Dallas, as evidenced by the Federal Railroad Administration's map. Dallas instead is part of the so-called South Central Corridor connecting Tulsa, Oklahoma City, the DFW, Austin, San Antonio and Little Rock.) On the blog The Infrastructurist, Yonah Freemark argues otherwise in a lengthy post. This excerpt to get you warmed up:
By populating [Glaeser's] model with a better set of assumptions, we hope to show how badly the economist missed the mark even on his handpicked example of an HSR link between Houston and Dallas. In reality, a well-designed high speed intercity rail project between the two largest cities in Lone Star State would likely produce a net economic benefit -- nothing at all like the white elephant Glaeser conjures up. In this more comprehensive model that takes into account trivialities like regional population growth and a reality-based route, the total annual benefits $840 million compared with construction and maintenance costs of $810 million. Which is to say, our numbers show that HSR pays for itself rather handily.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you'll never miss Observer's biggest stories.