The lesbian brain

"All women who've wanted to break out of the prison of consciousness...are strange monsters," declared travel writer and poet May Sarton, "who've renounced the treasure of their silence for a curious, devouring pleasure." She goes on to name Emily Dickinson, Christina Rossetti, and Sappho as examples, so we know she's referring to women writers. Well, guess what, Ms. Sarton. Being a young male critic in a roomful of older male family members--most of whom have commonsense jobs--and trying to explain exactly what it is you do, can make you feel like Frankenstein shambling through the countryside for a handout too. Women, and men for that matter, who have devoted their energies to breaking out of their consciousness for the devouring pleasure of big ideas have mutated into a shape wrought by this curious dependency. And it doesn't always play well with the folks back home or that first date sitting across the candlelit restaurant table.

This thought--and May Sarton's lyric line--whispered in my mind as I attended Echo Theatre's pristine production of Claire Chafee's feminist meditation Why We Have a Body. As time goes on and friends of both genders and every personality type get older, it seems more and more obvious from this corner that men and women are more alike than different. Yet because sham authors are out there making beaucoup bucks off field guides to Mars and Venus, it doesn't look as if there are many national advocates ready to trumpet this proposition. Why We Have a Body, which sometimes sails far out into the ozone, deals with quotidian issues like the desire to be desired, the difficulty (maybe even inability) to shed old family roles in adulthood, the wrenching discovery of previously unexpected emotions, and the struggle to accept a body that the social order condemns. So is being an insecure, family-entangled, out-of-shape individual who's uncertain how priorities will change an exclusively female fate? I think not.

Why We Have a Body breaks out of the playwright's consciousness as well as the conception of naturalistic comedy-drama with its deliberately imagistic language, its long monologues mixed with memory and imagination, and its lack of a clear resolution for its characters. These pursuits are laudable, the kind of stuff we flee into the theater seeking when life becomes mundane or unbearably linear, but they are just pitchers into which the playwright must drain the syrup of raw experience. The source of this syrup is the characters, and us, since we're watching the characters to find ourselves. But I heard more truisms than truths coming from female roles that were recognizable--but only after much squinting. Never fear. Director Pam Myers-Morgan and her expert cast are full of the right juices. They ensure audiences will get their fingers sticky with the sweet and sour sauce that seems missing from Claire Chafee's recipe on paper.

Chafee's play begins with a series of monologues that introduces the characters sort of the way Faulkner did in As I Lay Dying, dropping us chapter by chapter into the raging stream of their consciousness and leaving us to infer their importance to each other. Lili (Joanna Schellenberg) is a private detective who specializes in helping women track down missing husbands and is sister to Mary (Kelly Thomas), who specializes in knocking over 7-Elevens and studying Joan of Arc and Sylvia Plath for lifestyle hints. Lili is constantly bailing her mentally unstable sister out of trouble, but doesn't listen to the wise little hints (if only by example, crime notwithstanding) Mary drops about the ways in which Lili can begin to lift the heavy lid of the box in which she feels trapped. In part, she and Mary are yearning for the return of their errant mother Eleanor (Linda Comess), a pith-helmeted adventurer who, even while pregnant with her daughters, was "looking out across the desert dreaming of transportation." But Mary also is a private investigator who wants finally to be investigated, to be "the mystery." She hooks up on an airplane with Renee (Linda Marie Ford), an unhappily married woman who begins a tango of hesitance and smoldering attraction with her.

These are the framework situations, the window boxes inside which sprout various comic and wistful observations about family bonds, the search for love, and the struggle to accept an unconventional self in a conventional world. There are no cheerleader choruses here, and the author, to her credit, states in a program note that she is representing nobody's lesbian brain "but my own." Still, sapphic sisters and their brethren are likely to recognize certain hilarious brainwaves in this play, like psycho Mary's habit of playing therapy tapes for comfort while she's on the lam, a voice loop endlessly repeating questions like: "How did that make you feel? Is there a pattern here?" or a frightened Renee circling around the bed she will soon share with Lili, weaving memories and needs into one big, nervous, formal presentation instead of trusting the moment and diving head-first into the sack.

KEEP THE DALLAS OBSERVER FREE... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Jimmy Fowler