Now That Don Hill's Been Found Guilty, What About "Business as Usual" at Dallas City Hall?

So, it turns out Patrick "Buzz" Williams was right. No matter how you do the accounting, how you structure the contracts, how you interpret arcane campaign finance laws and city ethics policies, getting caught on camera accepting 10 grand in cash out back of a church is still like getting caught naked in your neighbor's house.

Moments ago, of course, a racially diverse jury in the Dallas City Hall corruption trial in federal court picked up its ax and whacked through a dense tangle of counter-arguments by the defense: Guilty, guilty, guilty, the jury said of five defendants ranging from a popular former Dallas city council member to an unknown used car dealer.

Observer reporters have been talking to people around Dallas for the last two weeks about what this trial will have to say about Dallas City Hall. The overwhelming sentiment has been that this kind of verdict -- everybody guilty -- should go straight to the heart of the way this city does politics. Should. Assuming there is a heart.

Don Hill, elected to the Dallas city council in 1999, 2002, '03, '05 and '07 and once considered a serious contender for mayor of Dallas, is now a convicted felon. So is his wife, Sheila Farrington-Hill, also his appointee to the City Plan Commission, D'Angelo Lee, and his political crony Darren Reagan (proprietor of the Black State Employees Association of Texas which had no black state employees as members) and Ricky Robertson, a little-known little guy who wandered into the middle of a far-reaching extortion bribery plot.

The big theme offered by the defense was "politics as usual." In other words, the 14 defendants in this mess (several of whom pleaded guilty before the trial) were just doing business the way everybody does it at Dallas City Hall -- selling their votes for money filtered through consulting contracts and campaign contributions.

Most of the people we have talked to thought the defense was making a pretty good point. But they think it's an argument for why a hell of a lot more people ought to be headed to the pokey, not for why anybody should get off.

Remember that Don Hill sought and received opinions from the Dallas City Attorney telling him that his way of operating as copacetic. What does that tell you about copacetic?

The over-arching reality here is that the FBI and the Justice Department looked at Dallas City Hall's version of copacetic and said to themselves, "No, that's not copacetic. That's extortion." And a jury of 12 peers just agreed with them. So what happens now to business as usual?

KEEP THE DALLAS OBSERVER FREE... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Jim Schutze has been the city columnist for the Dallas Observer since 1998. He has been a recipient of the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies’ national award for best commentary and Lincoln University’s national Unity Award for writing on civil rights and racial issues. In 2011 he was admitted to the Texas Institute of Letters.
Contact: Jim Schutze