Ron Kirk's Crying Game

But enough about you. Let's talk about me. In "Selling Ron," last week's Dallas Observer cover story by Christine Biederman, former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk went on at some length about what a racist I am. Among other things, he said, "Jim is just as racist, in a liberal way, as anybody. He still wants to fit me into a box of how a black politician should be."

Two things off the bat: There was a legitimate reason for this issue to come up in an interview with Kirk by a writer for the Observer. Biederman was assuring Kirk, a candidate for Phil Gramm's Senate seat, that her piece would not wind up sounding like me. Fair enough.

Second: When someone as sophisticated as Ron Kirk accuses me of racism, I have to weigh very seriously the possibility that he may be right. As a white man of a certain age, I know that I suffer at least a narrowness of perspective born of growing up white in a divided society. And that can come out as racism. As Forrest Gump should have said, racism is as racism does. I watch for it.

But finally, enough.

After pondering this and repondering it over a period of years, I have come to a conclusion about Kirk. His whole thing about ending the blame game is an absolute sham. Kirk is the master of the blame game. He has taken the issue of race and turned it into his own fiendishly clever Las Vegas-style card trick. And because his use of the race card has major bearing on the immediate future of this city, he needs to be outed.

This isn't about Kirk's candidacy for the U.S. Senate. I am writing this before the March 12 Democratic primary, which will already have occurred when this column is published. He may or may not still be in the race when you read this.

My issue with Kirk and the race card is about Dallas, with immediate practical consequences for the city. His clever use of race is tied directly to the Trinity River plan, which he calls part of his "grand vision" as mayor and which is probably the single biggest public-policy puzzle on the city's plate right now for all sorts of reasons, one of which is that the city is broke.

Kirk has always used race as a kind of cover story and system of defense for the plan, which makes it really hard for the city to sort any of it out. But the plan itself, to rebuild the river where it runs through the center of the city, was in serious trouble even before we got broke.

Let's cut to the chase: Kirk and the public-works contractors and landholders who bankrolled his mayoralty were never interested in the lakes and parks and nature trails, the warm fuzzies that they used to sell the Trinity River plan. Nor were they interested in flood control. Nor were they interested in extending flood protection to black neighborhoods that had never been protected in the past.

What they wanted and still want is an eight- to 10-lane freeway built right on top of the river, flying over black neighborhoods such as Ideal and Bon-ton on elevated roadways without even an exit or an entrance. The road hustlers need new levees south of downtown in order to provide fill dirt and a foundation for their highway. That's all they want.

And in the process they are willing to commit an act of major environmental racism by ignoring the much safer and saner alternative that the people of the Cadillac Heights neighborhood have been seeking for years, a buyout with no levee.

It's a bad road. It doesn't relieve traffic. It goes from the wrong place to the wrong place. The traffic projections for it don't show enough people ever using this road to justify federal support or to pay the bonds for toll-road construction. The only conceivable reason for the road to be built is that it somehow benefits the narrow coterie of private interests who have lobbied for it so relentlessly in the last five years, among them Kirk's principal financial backers each time he ran for mayor.

One after another the government partners in this multibillion-dollar plan have been lining up against it in recent months. The White House has made the entire Trinity River plan a target in its war on wasteful public-works expenditures. It says the plan provides poor flood protection and was not presented honestly to the public.

The state of Texas is now saying it won't be coming up with its own share of the highway costs any time in the next 12 years. The North Texas Tollway Authority is admitting that its own plans are on hold.

KEEP THE DALLAS OBSERVER FREE... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Jim Schutze has been the city columnist for the Dallas Observer since 1998. He has been a recipient of the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies’ national award for best commentary and Lincoln University’s national Unity Award for writing on civil rights and racial issues. In 2011 he was admitted to the Texas Institute of Letters.
Contact: Jim Schutze