This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the case James LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Assoc., Inc., et al., which probably means nothing to you. Unless, that is, you're invested in your company's 401(k) plan, in which case, this Dallas-based case is plenty interesting.
Because, see, this morning the Supreme Court justices sided with LaRue, who's been trying to sue the Dallas-based management consulting firm, claiming the DeWolff, Boberg & Associates didn't allow him to make changes to his investment accounts, as he'd requested. LaRue figures the company's inaction cost him upwards of $100,000. The court didn't rule in the case; it only said it could move forward, reversing a lower court's earlier ruling. Reported Bloomberg News moments ago: "U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled they will let participants in 401(k) retirement plans file lawsuits claiming their accounts were mishandled." Seventy million Americans just got very interested in this case. Very. --Robert Wilonsky
Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.