This probably won't shock anyone: I didn't see Central 214 chef Blythe Beck's television debut in The Naughty Kitchen.
I did hand the preview copy over to one of our writers, who made it part way through the opening episode before, as this writer put it, "her [Beck's] annoying voice forced me to turn it off. I couldn't take it anymore."
So much for a review. I realize such programs are meant as entertainment. But it seems like the networks roll them out on a conveyor. So why do we put up with this? Is The Naughty Kitchen worth watching? More importantly, are any of the 'reality food shows worth watching?
Results from last week, in which we asked if live music was a good idea in restaurants:
Until good ol' TG's post--"ask the Libertine. ha hahaha"--we had no idea that music editor Pete Freedman had DJ duties at The Libertine on certain nights. Pete doesn't talk to City of Ate staffers after that incident where we submitted a column titled "Why I Miss Line Dancing" under his name.
That was one revelation. Another came from Reified Beans, who pointed out that "Conjuntos and mariachis kick ass. If the Adolphus would bring some in, I'd eat at the French Room a lot more often. (Great mariachi acoustics in there.)"
In general, readers said restaurant managers need to show some sensitivity toward issues such as volume--diners want to converse at normal levels, even when the band or DJ is working--and the quality of performer they hire. To the former, tijbbari writes "I expect the band or DJ to be too loud at a bar or club, but at a primarily eating place (Sambuca & Terelli's I'm looking in your general direction), it is a turnoff when the music volume makes eating unpleasant and talking impossible." As far as quality is concerned, luniz points out "Most compilations that are played in restaurants just aren't very good, period...I'd rather have a DJ who knew what he was about. Or nothing (even better)."
But none want recorded music across the board. As RestaurantZoom says, "There is really a time and place for each yes? That's what makes life so great...choices:-)"
Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.