4
| Courts |

$2 Billion LBJ Project Would Block Billboards, So Billboard Companies Want Project Stopped

^
Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

Lamar Advantage Outdoor Company and Ralston Outdoor Advertising each own a handful of billboards along I-35 between the Loop 12 split on the south and the intersection with LBJ on the north.

Last year, the companies began to worry about the impact to their property of the LBJ Express Project, the $2 billion reconstruction of 635 that will also add elevated HOV lanes along the aforementioned stretch of I-35. In August they submitted, through their attorney, an open records request for the agency's "Takings Impact Assessment"

TxDOT failed to respond in timely manner to open records request seeking information on the agency's "Takings Impact Assessment," a document that spells out a project's potential effect on private property. After some delay, TxDOT responded that it had no such document. The companies discovered through other means that their property would indeed be impacted.

"Specifically, the elevated ramps that will connect Loop 12 and I-35E to I-635 will block several of our clients' billboard locations and prevent them from using the signs as they are being used and would otherwise continue to be used," their attorney, J. Allen Smith, wrote in a May 15 letter to TxDOT.

Smith also took the agency to task for failing to draft a TIA, which he said was required under Texas' Private Real Property Rights Preservation Act. Then, he issued an ultimatum: "If TxDOT does not immediately cease all construction, our clients will have no choice but to pursue all avenues available under Texas and federal law to protect their property rights."

Which explains the lawsuit filed yesterday in Dallas County by Lamar, Ralston, and the owners of the land on which their billboards stand. The complaint, first reported by Courthouse News, asks a judge to declare TxDOT's decision to pursue the project void, effectively slamming the breaks on the whole, $2 billion shebang.

Whether that happens will be up to a judge, and TxDOT, which has not yet returned a call for comment, is sure to fight the lawsuit tooth and nail. But Smith says the agency is "really proceeding at their own peril" by operating without a TIA, and he thinks a judge will agree the law is firmly on the billboard owners' side.

"I guess that's what bulldozers and cranes are for."

Update at 2:11 p.m.: TxDOT spokesman Tony Hartzel says the company does not comment on pending litigation.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.