4

Creationists Fear Defeat in This Week's Biology Textbook Adoption

^
Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

The State Board of Education doesn't vote on new high-school biology textbooks until Friday, but the Discovery Institute -- an avowed foe of teaching evolution in public schools -- is bracing for the worst.

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, an institute board member, tells Evolution News and Views that the proposed textbooks will "leave students in the dark about contemporary mainstream scientific controversies over Darwinian evolution."

Meyer was appointed an expert reviewer in 2009, when the SBOE was drawing a new science curriculum. His faction's great victory was a small phrase that held vast implications. Students would be asked to "analyze and evaluate" the theory of evolution's guiding principles. Because courts have found that the teaching of creationism and intelligent design is unconstitutional, their advocates have had to subsist on hinting at nonexistent controversies and flaws they say undermine evolution.

As told in last week's cover story, institute fellow and expert reviewer Ray Bohlin and others faulted the new crop of biology texts for failing to teach the "analyze and evaluate" mandate. The publisher of one of the country's most widely used biology texts, Pearson, refused to accede to the reviewers' demands. It responded to their concerns without weakening the text by addressing what creationists call "gaps" in the fossil record, and other pet theories that have been soundly and repeatedly debunked.

See also: Creationists' Last Stand at the State Board of Education

The question on everyone's mind is how the SBOE will respond. Will it adopt the book as is when it votes Friday? Or will the culture wars be kindled anew, and will Pearson's text be rejected for failing to conform with the curriculum?

Meyer is already lamenting the creationists' defeat. The books adopted this week will remain in Texas classrooms for a decade or more. The institute and its supporters on the SBOE would see it as a decade lost to secularism and a materialist view of the natural world.

"Students should be trained to think independently, rather than be drilled in rote fashion," he said. "Unfortunately, because Texas is a major purchaser of textbooks, the board's action may have an adverse impact on science education across America for years to come."

H/T Texas Freedom Network

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.