Department of Justice Drops Objections to Texas Voter ID Law

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

As was hinted might be the case late last month, the U.S. Department of Justice will no longer support the lawsuit filed by Dallas U.S. Representative Marc Veasey and several voting rights groups against the state of Texas’ voter ID law. In a filing made late Monday afternoon, attorneys for the Justice Department asked that the federal government’s claim that the law is racially discriminatory be dismissed. Instead, the brief argues, the Texas state legislature should be given a chance to modify law during its current legislative session, echoing the state of Texas’ argument.

Former President Barack Obama’s Justice Department filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2013, winning a victory when a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled before the 2016 presidential election that the law was discriminatory in practice, if not intent. A temporary fix was implemented, allowing those without one of the seven government-issued photo IDs considered acceptable voter identification to sign an affidavit attesting to the reason they didn’t have ID in order to get a ballot. The law was then sent back to the U.S. District court to reevaluate whether the intent of the law was racial discrimination.

The Donald Trump Justice Department filed a motion on Inauguration Day asking that a scheduled hearing in the case be rescheduled for Feb. 28. Late last week Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos denied a further request for delay from the state and Justice Department lawyers.

J. Gerald Hebert, an attorney who represents multiple plaintiffs in the case, including Veasey, blasted the Department of Justice Monday afternoon.

"I am appalled and disgusted that D.O.J. would abandon their claims, that they have advocated for years, that Texas’ photo ID law was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose," Hebert said in a statement. "The facts on which they based those claims have not changed one bit. The only facts that have changed are Trump’s election and Jeff Sessions’s appointment as Attorney General."

Despite the feds’ withdrawal, Hebert and the other plaintiffs in the case intend to continue fighting the law in federal court.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.