| Courts |

Jerry Jones Lawyers Deny Sexual Assault Allegations at Hearing

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

The lawyer for Cowboys owner Jerry Jones appeared in a Dallas courtroom Friday to argue that a lawsuit accusing Jones of sexual assault -- and the Cowboys of conspiracy to cover it up -- should be dismissed because of the statute of limitations.

Attorney Gregory Shamoun also said the claims made against Jones earlier this month were lies.

Jones never assaulted Jana Weckerly in June 2009, Shamoun said, so there could not have been a conspiracy between Jones, the Cowboys and Jones' longtime attorney -- and co-defendant in this case -- Levi McCathern.

In most circumstances, plaintiffs are limited to five years to file a sexual assault claim and two years to file conspiracy claim. Weckerly filed her lawsuit on September 8 this year.

Her lawyer Thomas Bowers argued, based on a 19th century state law, that the statute of limitations for the sexual assault extended each time Jerry Jones left the state during the intervening five years. Basically to find the actual statute of limitations, if Judge Dale Tillery buys Bowers' argument, someone would have to total up all the time Jones spent out of Texas between June 2009 and June 2014 and add it to the date the statute of limitations would have expired.

Shamoun and McCathern said that the law Bowers cited didn't apply in this case, because Jones could have easily been served by the plaintiff at any time.

"Nobody in the state is easier to find than Jerry Jones," McCathern said.

Judge Tillery was dubious that Jones' profile had anything to do with the case.

"You don't suggest that the law should be different for [Jones]?" he asked McCathern.

Bowers' claims regarding the conspiracy charges were clearer. Because Weckerly allegedly received payments from Jones, by way of McCathern, as late as July 2013, two years have not passed since the last act in the conspiracy.

Weckerly, Bowers said, accepted the money, which she didn't want, under duress and without a lawyer.

"Having just been a victim of sexual assault, she was coerced by forced payments and threats," Bowers said. "We've got a mountain of intimidation and threats."

McCathern, who represented himself, was clear.

"The facts pled here are false," he said. "If the conspiracy is true, there is no bigger actor [in the conspiracy] than Jana Weckerly."

Weckerly is the only party involved who received any money, the only one who benefited, McCathern said.

A final hearing and ruling on the defendants' statute of limitations claims is set for October 16.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.