The lawsuit Patricia Lawson filed Tuesday against Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas is a straightforward discrimination claim. Lawson, a 64-year-old surgical systems supervisor with two decades' experience at the hospital, says Presby fired her in October 2012 for being too old and a woman.
The hospital didn't admit that, of course. No sensible HR manager would fire a member of a protected class without first scrounging up some legally defensible justification. So, when the hospital told Lawson she was fired, it said it had caught her violating Texas Health Resources' code of conduct.
"More specifically," the lawsuit says, "[Lawson] was told she was fired for giving information regarding customary pricing for a surgical procedure to a doctor."
To review, Presby didn't fire Lawson because she was old, which would be illegal. It canned her because she provided information on what potential patients might expect to pay, which is totally kosher.
A spokesman for Texas Health Resources said he would take a look at the lawsuit but has not yet responded to a request for comment. But hospitals' opacity when it comes to pricing is well known.
Stephen Brill's piece in Time last year did a solid job of capturing the absurdity of the health care industry's pricing practices and prompted the federal government to release "chargemaster" data showing the base price hospitals bill Medicare for the most common procedures.
Presby, for the record, bills the feds at a lower rate than most Dallas hospitals. That's something, but the data say little about what insurance companies, or the uninsured, wind up paying, which varies widely based on circumstances and bargaining power.
A rational health care market, one in which patients can make fully informed decisions about which provider to choose based on cost and quality of care, is still a long way off. To get there -- if that ever happens -- prices will have to be posted up front, and there will have to be a relatively easy way to compare them. Also, hospitals will probably have to stop firing employees who tell customers what they'll be charged.
Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.