4
| News |

Sorry, DMN, That Really Was the Worst National Anthem Ever

^
Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

There are some things that are simply indefensible. One of those things is 11-year-old Harper Gruzins' rendition of the "Star-Spangled Banner" at Saturday's FC Dallas-L.A. Galaxy soccer match called out by Deadspin.

The Morning News didn't think so. Nancy Churnin wrote an indignant counter-post this afternoon: "Deadspin dead 'off' in attacking 11-year-old's rendition of the National Anthem."

So I listened to her rendition and I was flabbergasted by the vitriol. First, if you hate the way she sang the song that much, why are you posting it and encouraging readers to listen over and over? Just to make fun of her? Second, Deadspin compares this "worst ever" performance to renditions by Steven Tyler and Roseanne. Remember, they are adults, and they tampered with the song, with Roseanne grabbling her crotch with the misguided idea that everyone would think that was funny. Harper was off key, but she sang the song proudly, enunciating all the words and putting everything she had into it.

She concludes: "Although it's a funny thing, if you don't humiliate and tear those dreamers down, some of them may actually grow into their dreams. Seems worth the chance of refraining from attacks like this."

We wish Harper Gruzins the best. Maybe she just had an off night, but whose dreams are we talking about here? I'm sure there are millions of 11-year-olds who dream of being pop stars and think they can sing really well, but does that mean they should belt out the national anthem in front of a few million people? Does that mean she needs a manager and a promotional website?

That's where the parents should step in. There's a big difference between encouraging a child to dream and inflating their ego to unreasonable proportions, either through overindulgence of childish whims or through the parents' vicarious pursuit of glory.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.