Texas is Trying to Get Itself Sued Again Over Abortion Rights

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

The group of lawyers that shepherded the plaintiffs through the case that eventually led to the Supreme Court toppling most of Texas' onerous anti-abortion law, House Bill 2, is readying itself to take on the state again. This time the fight is over Texas Governor Greg Abbott's under-the-radar call to require facilities that provide abortion care or miscarriage management to bury or cremate all embryonic or fetal tissue resulting from miscarriages or abortions.

"I believe that it is imperative to establish higher standards that reflect our respect for the sanctity of life," Abbott said in a July email to supporters. "That is why Texas will require clinics or hospitals to bury or cremate all human remains."

Lawyers at the Center for Reproductive Rights say that Abbott's proposed requirement, which would become effective in September after a currently ongoing public comment period, would burden women and facilities providing abortion without providing a commiserate benefit. It's a similar argument to the women made by Center for Reproductive Rights Senior Counsel Stephanie Toti when she argued against state requirements that required admitting privileges at local hospitals for doctors providing abortions and that abortion clinics be outfitted as surgical centers: Requiring the fetal remains be interred or burned does nothing to make abortion safer, it simply makes getting one more onerous.

"Texas politicians are at it again, inserting their personal beliefs into the health care decisions of Texas women,” Toti said in a statement issued Monday. "The Center for Reproductive Rights is prepared to take further legal action to ensure that Texas women can continue to access abortion and other reproductive health care without interference by politicians."

A similar Indiana requirement, signed into law by Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence, was struck down by a federal court in June. In that case, Indiana Planned Parenthood affiliates argued that their cost could go up two to four times if they were required to change the way they handled fetal remains.

A public hearing to discuss the new regulations is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.