| Crime |

Very Brady: Inmate Scheduled for Execution May Have Had Rights Violated After All

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

Let's get back to Kim's item about Roderick Newton, scheduled to be executed by the state on Thursday, for just a minute. And let's go ahead and set aside the issue of  "mental retardation." Instead, focus on the second of three claims Newton's attorneys make in the writ filed today -- the one that alleges a so-called Brady violation, which refers to the burying of exculpatory evidence. It would appear that very thing happened when Newton was being tried for the murder of Jesus Montoya in March 1999.

According to the writ filed by attorneys David Finn and Clint Broden, Julian Williams -- who was with Newton when Montoya was killed -- met with Dallas County District Attorney's Office representatives only days ago. During that interview with Terri Moore and Mike Ware, Williams -- who testified at trial against Newton and received 10 years for his role in the crime -- told them he gave a statement to a Mesquite detective that was never admitted into evidence during the original trial in 2000. In that statement, included in today's filing, Williams acknowledged that it was he who pawned Montoya's necklace, not Newton.

Finn tells Unfair Park that Assistant District Attorney Kim Schaefer actually found the missing statement -- not in the District Attorney's files, but in the detective's. Included in today's filing is a July 10 e-mail from Moore to Finn and Broder in which she acknowledges, "We believe the defense never had the information. Therefore, there is a Brady violation." Unfair Park has been unsuccessful in reaching anyone in Craig Watkins' office this evening, but we will have something further in the morning.

"I gotta give Craig Watkins and Terri Moore credit," Finn says. "The way this Brady violation came about, they could have played hide the ball, and they didn't, which is a credit to the DA's office. They could have tried to bury this. ... I fully expect the Criminal Court of Appeals will postpone the execution, and we'll go back to court and fight it out."

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.