| Tennis |


The greatest current one-on-one battle in all of sports.
Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

As a stupid guy once famously said in a super movie, “Sorry I had ta fight in da middle of ya black pantha pawwty,” but I can’t let another day pass without opining on the greatest tennis match I ever did see.

(No worries. Another Greg Williams serving arrives this afternoon.)

I fully understand I’m in the minority, loving and playing tennis and all. But if you watched Sunday’s classic Wimbledon final between Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal I don’t have to sell you on why it can be the most riveting, fascinating and dramatic of all sports.

No timeouts. No coaches. No clock. Just mano y mano. And for an astounding four hours and 48 minutes, each point ascended in significance. Nadal, the boy who would be king, had three match points. Federer, the undisputed king, flirted within two points of a record sixth consecutive Wimbledon.

Finally, in darkness and in immortality, Federer netted a forehand that sent Nadal onto his back and into history with a 6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5-7), 6-7 (8-10), 9-7 victory. It was simply the best Wimbledon final I’ve ever seen, topping the one that first got me involved in the sport -- the 1980 match when Bjorn Borg beat John McEnroe in five sets despite losing an epic fourth-set tie-breaker by an amazing 18-16. In honor of my new Swedish idol, I started growing my hair long the next day.

Some of America agrees with me as the final drew a 4.6 TV rating, best for a title tilt not involving an American since ’91. But, of course, a repeat of America’s Funniest Home Videos earned a 5.5 later Sunday night so, yeah, the sport has a looong road back to relevancy.

We're not exactly on the brink of another WCT Finals in the Metroplex, but don't think Jerry Jones hasn't thought of packing his new Jonestown Coliseum with a Federer-Nadal exhibition. Or maybe that was me that just of thought it. Not bad, huh?

Roger vs. Rafa can yank tennis out of the sports sewer, even with U.S. men’s tennis at one of its all-time lowest points. (No American man made it out of the third round in London.) Nadal is 22 and Federer only 26, yet they’ve already met in six Grand Slam finals, something Borg-McEnroe or Sampras-Agassi ever accomplished.

When they play it’s like watching Ali-Frazier, or even Tiger vs. Tiger.

If you missed the match you can watch it on ESPN Classic round the clock over the next week. And if you caught it live, I don’t have to tell you that the U.S. Open final is set for Sept. 7. -- Richie Whitt

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.