Education

Federal Judge Tells Local Creationists They Didn’t Make Their Case For Master’s Degree

Seems we weren't the only ones following the case of the Institute for Creation Research v. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board; so too was The Chronicle of Higher Education, which alerts our attention to a ruling by U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks handed down Friday that has closed the case...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Seems we weren’t the only ones following the case of the Institute for Creation Research v. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board; so too was The Chronicle of Higher Education, which alerts our attention to a ruling by U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks handed down Friday that has closed the case. The federal judge took 39 pages to recap the litigation — which began in ’07, more or less, when the Royal Lane-based school first sought to offer a master’s degree in science from “a Biblical scientific creationist viewpoint” — and, ultimately, dismiss the suit filed by the school in April 2009, in which ICR claimed, among other things, that the state’s refusal was religious discrimination and a violation of its First Amendment rights.

Wrote Sparks: “The Court finds ICRGS has not put forth evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to any claim it brings.” Thus ends, for now, three years of ICR’s efforts to get that degree — though, surely, this isn’t the end of this case’s evolution in the courts. The entire ruling follows.

Judge Sam Sparks Ruling in ICR v. Texas Higher Ed Coordinating Board

Will you step up to support Dallas Observer this year?

We’re aiming to raise $30,000 by December 31, so we can continue covering what matters most to you. If the Dallas Observer matters to you, please take action and contribute today, so when news happens, our reporters can be there.

$30,000

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the This Week’s Top Stories newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...