Two years ago, the council's Economic Development Committee took a long, hard look at parking rates at Love Field and agreed with the recommendation that it gradually hike prices "over several years" for several reasons -- among them, Love Field's just too cheap, and it'll help offset some of the costs of updating the airport. Which is why the 3,079-space Garage A, the alleged short-term lot closest to the terminal, went from $10 a day to $12 in October '08, and why 3,965-space Garage B jumped from $7 to $8.
The plan was, and remains, to keep on increasing the pricing spread between the two garage's prices in order to shift people toward Garage B -- especially since, between the end of the Wright Amendment in 2014 and the Love Field Modernization Program scheduled to wrap around the same time, parking at the short-term lot's expected to get even more jam-packed, if such a thing's possible. Either get people the F outta A, which is usually close to full-up during peak hours, and back into B, or they'll have to build a new garage. And no one wants that.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
Which brings us to this morning's Economic Development Committee meeting, in which Aviation Administration Director Dan Weber proposes yet another parking rate hike: jumping Garage A to $14 a day, and bumping B to $10. And even that, says the briefing, is awful cheap compared to Dallas-Fort Worth International ($17 a day short-term), Austin Bergstrom ($20) and Houston Hobby ($17). If council says okee-doke on September 8, new rates go into effect October 1. I know, I know -- what about the People Mover? Got a spare quarter of a billion? That's what happened.