How Come Lawyer Against Beer, Wine Vote Didn't Pop Top on Case in State Supreme Court?

Andy Siegel

A Friend of Unfair Park was saying only yesterday he hadn't heard much in recent weeks about

the upcoming vote to get Dallas wet

from folks for or against the off-premise sale of beer and wine citywide. Which reminded me: Whatever happened to

election foe Andy Siegel's plan to take his election-killing writ to the Supreme Court of Texas

following 5th District Court of Appeals Judge Elizabeth Lang-Miers's decision to toss the thing out of her courtroom at the end of August? Checked the court's website and found nothing. So I called and e-mailed Siegel and asked: What happened? He replied via e-mail last night:

We've decided not to appeal at this late date b/c it's so unlikely a Court would stop an election from going forward. Thus, regrettably, we'll wait & see how the election turns out & reserve our right to contest a Wet election result. There's no doubt that the City did not properly call a lawful election. Indeed, the City has refused to provide any evidence that it validated the necessary number of qualified Petition signatures PRIOR to calling an election. ... Like it or not, an election called based on a prospective hope or finding of sufficient signatures, is void.

The city, of course, disagrees.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.