In tomorrow's Dallas Morning News, you will find this story about council member Angela Hunt's trips to both The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee and Africam Safari Park in Mexico. As the Friends know, the latter is where the Dallas Zoo is sending Jenny the elephant -- and Hunt was concerned that perhaps zoo officials had made the wrong choice. (It's a sentiment echoed by others in our news story about Jenny's relocation that ran July 3.) After her fact-finding trip, Hunt is convinced they have made a colossal mistake.
Also in tomorrow's paper, you'll find Steve Blow's column berating Hunt for interfering with "the professionals." After the jump, Hunt responds at great length to Blow's piece. She also provides more photos from her fact-finding sojourn. And, tomorrow, we'll go one better: video from Mexico! Really, does Hunt not know she's supposed to spend her summer vacation wasting her time? --Robert Wilonsky
From Angela Hunt:
Since Mr. Blow had not called me at any point prior to writing his article about Jenny the Elephant (in which -- in his words -- he was going to "gig me"), I called him to talk before his article went to print. It was online by 3:28 p.m.
At 3:44 p.m., shortly after receiving the message from my assistant that he was looking for me, I spoke with Mr. Blow about why I considered the matter of Jenny the Elephant important enough to travel thousands of miles to Puebla, Mexico and Hohenwald, Tennessee: No. 1, Since Jenny is our charge, we have a responsibility to ensure we find the best location for her to spend the rest of her life. And No 2. I've been inundated with e-mails, both from my constituents and from around the country, on this issue; I owe it to my constituents to be as informed as possible.
He asked why I didn't agree with staff's recommendation to move the elephant to Mexico. I explained that if the council never disagreed with city staff's recommendations, there would be no need for a city council. In this instance, as I explained to Mr. Blow, the Dallas Zoo belongs to the AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums), an organization that does not approve of relocating animals to facilities outside of its business association.
Because most sanctuaries are not members of the AZA (due to philosophical differences), the AZA opposed such a move and may threaten to sanction our zoo if we place Jenny with a sanctuary. I pointed out that, despite the AZA's position, many other zoos across the country had relocated animals to sanctuaries over the objections of the AZA, and even referred him to a 2001 article in The Washington Post on a similar situation in Detroit.
I also mentioned that Jenny is an elephant with special needs. She has behavioral issues (part of the reason she is being relocated), some of which include being afraid of cars. The Mexican zoo is a drive-through zoo: Cars will drive past her all the time. The Tennessee sanctuary doesn't allow the public to drive within the sanctuary and would further accommodate Jenny's special needs.
When Mr. Blow pointed out that the Mexican zoo did not treat their animals cruelly, I noted that I never said that they did. But I did note that if he had a sick child, he would want that child to go to the very best hospital possible. That wouldn't mean that all the other hospitals were torturing their patients, nor that the other hospitals weren't the perfect fit for other children with other medical conditions. It would simply mean he had selected the hospital that would provide the very best care for the particular ailment facing his child.
I tell you all of this because none of it -- not a single word of my conversation with Mr. Blow on this topic -- will be reflected in his column tomorrow because "it's already written." When I asked Mr. Blow to please call me in the future prior to writing his column, he informed me that he knew exactly what I was going to say about Jenny the Elephant because he had spoken to a metro reporter (Joanna Cattanach) who told him what I had told her. That's good reporting there.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
First of all, his statement that "Ms. Hunt seems to have fallen under the sway of PETA" is absurd. I don't think I've ever talked with anyone at PETA about this issue. PETA has nothing to do with my position on this issue or my interest in visiting both the Mexican zoo and the Tennessee sanctuary prior to taking a position on the issue.
Then he notes that he heard second-hand that I find zoos sad, and concludes I'd be a crummy date to the Dallas Zoo cuz I'm such a Debby Downer. ("Wouldn't she be fun on a field trip to the zoo? Cotton candy? Snow cone? Prozac?" Ha!) The fact is, when I go to zoos where animals look cramped up in little cages and bored out of their minds, yeah, I find that kind of -- what is the word? -- sad. But to conclude I want to close the Dallas Zoo ("Given her feelings, perhaps Ms. Hunt should propose closing the Dallas Zoo at the next go-round of city budget hearings") is ridiculous. That's quite a leap, especially when Mr. Blow never asked me my opinion on the subject (or ever talked to me at all before writing his column). The fact is, I don't think we should close our zoo, but I do think we should improve it, which is one reason I supported $3.5 million in the most recent bond package to make much needed improvements.
As to Mr. Blow's statement that I've got more important issues to deal with, he failed to ask me what else I've been working on this month during council recess. If he'd asked, he would have learned that I have been going through the City Manager's proposed budget line by line, that I've been gathering information on upcoming District 14 zoning cases, that I've been preparing for judicial candidate interviews, and that I've been working on a living wage for our sanitation workers.