Sports Guy Bill Simmons on Why DFW Shouldn't (And Should) Host the Super Bowl

We know how Sports Illustratred's Peter King feels about the situation -- as opposed to, say, The Situation. Below, a Friend of Unfair Park directs us to a Q&A conducted with ESPN's beloved Sports Guy, Bill Simmons, in which he provides a Top 10 list of things every city should have before it's allowed to host a Super Bowl. Among the entries:

2. If your city shuts down for drinking at 2 a.m., you probably shouldn't host the Super Bowl.

3. If your downtown isn't big enough to house everybody, so some visitors will have to stay in another city that's at least 35-40 minutes away, you probably shouldn't host the Super Bowl.

10. If the only reason the Super Bowl is in your city is "We just built a new stadium," you shouldn't host the Super Bowl.
The gunman, hardly lone at this point, proceeds to take a few more shots. But then Simmons concludes, if you can't have the game in Las Vegas, Miami, San Diego, New Orleans, etc., well, shit, it might as well be in Dallas.
It's a fun city to visit if you've never been there (the JFK assassination spot pushes it over the top); it's like going to another country (as I've said many times, I believe Texas should secede -- it already has its own flag and identity, now it just needs to start printing its own money); it brings a unique food experience to the table (Texas barbecue); and it offers the best state-of-the-art football stadium on the planet.
ESPN's folks are HQ'd in Fort Worth, though, right?

KEEP THE DALLAS OBSERVER FREE... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Robert Wilonsky
Contact: Robert Wilonsky