“Pole Tax” Dances Into Texas Supreme Court

As you no doubt recall, the state of Texas has been trying for years to find a way to make its so-called "pole tax" stick. The first time around, a judge slapped down the $5-per-gentleman's-club-customer fee -- which was earmarked for sexual assault prevention programs -- as unconstitutional; last year's...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Keep Dallas Observer Free

We’re aiming to raise $10,000 by April 26. Your support ensures Dallas Observer can continue watching out for you and our community. No paywall. Always accessible. Daily online and weekly in print.

$10,000

As you no doubt recall, the state of Texas has been trying for years to find a way to make its so-called “pole tax” stick. The first time around, a judge slapped down the $5-per-gentleman’s-club-customer fee — which was earmarked for sexual assault prevention programs — as unconstitutional; last year’s second spin — which taxed a percentage of topless joints’ admission fees — was likewise tied up in litigation, and the $12 million raised so far is in an account waiting for the outcome of the case. State Sen. Royce West didn’t like it anyway: “Sexually
oriented businesses can wire around this by not charging an admission
fee.”

But as the Houston Chronicle reported over the weekend, a resolution’s due sooner than later: The case of the pole tax is going before the Texas Supreme Court in March. State legislators still want to see the tax levied. But a former Harris County prosecutor says this is really a tax on free speech. And with that, the quote of the week: “You start down a pathway that could lead to censorship-based government like that which exists in Iran.”

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the News newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...