Something Stinks About the News' Position on Moving Smelly Businesses Along the Trinity

Fine. Call me paranoid. I can take it. But there's a difference between being paranoid and being able to see through crap. Let's start with the crap:

On March 26, The Dallas Morning News ran an unsigned editorial/op-ed column in its Sunday "Points" section suggesting the city resolve the problem of smelly rendering plants and unsightly scrap yards along the Trinity River downtown by paying the operators to move their businesses to the new "Inland Port" trucking, rail and warehousing development in southern Dallas County.

The idea was painted as if it came from elected officials. But virtually all of the officials I contacted were opposed. Adamantly.

Seventeen different city officials made multiple visits to this rendering plant in a two month period. They said their visits, which produced no violation citations, were a coincidence. You believe that?
Seventeen different city officials made multiple visits to this rendering plant in a two month period. They said their visits, which produced no violation citations, were a coincidence. You believe that?

The story made it sound as if Dallas City Council member Pauline Medrano, whose District 2 includes some of the industries involved, had some reservations but was basically on board:

"[Medrano] says 'it's a win-win for everyone' if recyclers could be moved to more appropriate venues and compensated for their inconvenience," the article said.

That's definitely not what Medrano told me. She said she was called by Morning News editorial writer Tod Robberson, who told her the idea was his. She said she was skeptical, asking Robberson how the scheme would be paid for. "He says, 'Well, we'll get federal funding, and we'll do this.'"

Medrano says she said to Robberson, "'Oh, so, try to create a win-win.'" She says he answered, "'Oh yes, we'll do this.'" She says he told her, "'I've been thinking about this for over a year.'"

She asked him, "'And why now?'" She says he said, "'Oh, this thing just came up.'"

I called Robberson. He said, "The editorial speaks for itself. That's all I have to say."

I told him I thought Medrano's version made him sound like a liar. He said, "I have her on tape."

But why present this idea as coming from elected officials and not himself? Medrano thinks there is a bigger picture. She puts the Morning News piece together with things she is seeing at City Hall.

Somebody wants the land.

"I cannot put my finger on it," she said. "Someone has said something and a group has formulated to be part of this fantastic development. No one has told me anything. I'm just thinking it's gotta be. What else? And why all of a sudden?"

Another issue worth mentioning: The proposal that rendering plants and scrap-metal recyclers be pushed deeper into the southern sector makes a complete mockery of the Morning News' self-righteous "Bridging the Gap" campaign. For two years the editorial page has been calling for a spruce-up fix-up effort to make poor minority neighborhoods in the southern sector look nicer.

By sending them scrap yards?

Robberson's op-ed even suggested a specific site where the rendering and recycling operations could be sent—a large parcel owned by the city of Dallas within the part of the Inland Port that's inside the south-suburban city limits of Hutchins. The land was purchased decades ago for the announced purpose of a wastewater treatment facility.

Mayor Artis Johnson of Hutchins was blunt in expressing his opposition to the relocation: "It's ridiculous," he said. "That's the first time I had heard it, when I read it in the newspaper. I don't think the current zoning would allow that."

He made it plain that there will be major opposition in Hutchins to a zoning change to allow the industries to move in, starting with him: "They preach regionalism, so if you want people to be regional with you, you've got to keep the spirit of cooperation. I'm sure that would kill it."

Just to make sure I got his point, Johnson said, "Don't get shot in the foot trying to shoot me in the foot."

Gun references. Not a good sign.

Jeffery Steele, mayor of neighboring Wilmer, said the scheme to move rendering plants and scrap yards into the Inland Port would have a disastrous effect on future development. He also took issue with the News' patronizing description of the port area as the "struggling International Inland Port of Dallas, which has a heavy surplus of land and unused warehousing space."

"I was disappointed in the flavor of the story," Steele told me. "One thing I noticed was that there wasn't a byline credit. I also noticed that they defined the Inland Port as a struggling area needing business, and that's far from the truth.

"Here in Wilmer we are inking deals even in this depressed economy. We're fixing to announce a $40 million project next week."

Steele said allowing rendering plants and scrap yards to come into the Inland Port would work directly against the best interests of the area. "I don't think we would want to depress our taxable base by bringing in businesses such as that when we have competition for other entities that would bring in more viable business and a better tax base for us."

Steele added, "You wouldn't want to put a scrap yard next to Raytheon up in Richardson."

Oh, good point. For all the preaching about "bridging the gap," it didn't occur to the News to suggest that the rendering plants and scrap yards be sent north, did it? Maybe they just forgot about that direction.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help