Kemper, They Wanna a Piece of You

[
        {
          "name": "Air - MediumRectangle - Inline Content - Mobile Display Size",
          "component": "18855504",
          "insertPoint": "2",
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "2"
        },{
          "name": "Editor Picks",
          "component": "17105533",
          "insertPoint": "4",
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "1"
        },{
          "name": "Inline Links",
          "component": "18349797",
          "insertPoint": "8th",
          "startingPoint": 8,
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "7",
          "maxInsertions": 25
        },{
          "name": "Air - MediumRectangle - Combo - Inline Content",
          "component": "17105532",
          "insertPoint": "8th",
          "startingPoint": 8,
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "7",
          "maxInsertions": 25
        },{
          "name": "Inline Links",
          "component": "18349797",
          "insertPoint": "8th",
          "startingPoint": 12,
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "11",
          "maxInsertions": 25
        },{
          "name": "Air - Leaderboard Tower - Combo - Inline Content",
          "component": "17105535",
          "insertPoint": "8th",
          "startingPoint": 12,
          "requiredCountToDisplay": "11",
          "maxInsertions": 25
        }
      ]

SMU's Robert Kemper, who looks like he's just itching for a fight

Hey, Prof. Robert V. Kemper, Chair of SMU's Department of Anthropology, The Christian Post just called you a wussy for refusing to debate the "intelligent design" braintrust this weekend at the "Darwin vs. Design" "conference" at McFarlin Auditorium. Then again, it's probably hard to get worked up about all this when even supporters of intelligent design put themselves on the defensive whilst going on the offensive: "While the 'theory' of intelligent design may lack the technical components which would define it as such, the concept is definitely worth considering and worth discussing." Or not. --Robert Wilonsky