There's something rotten in Duncanville city government. Twenty-four of the past 30 months spent without a permanent city manager, a City Council bitterly divided, and now this: The city of Duncanville is suing Mayor Deborah Hodge.
Yes, that is a thing that can happen. The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday by the city attorney. The claim? That Hodge was arbitrarily requiring a two-thirds super-majority for basic council actions.
The squabble is best explained using the U.S. Senate as an analogy. For decades, the Senate has had a rule that, in effect, means you need a 60-vote supermajority to get anything done. The rule itself, though, could be changed by a simple majority, which is what finally happened when Democrats grew sufficiently frustrated with the slow progress of Obama's nominations.
Duncanville City Council rules also require a supermajority for certain things: closing debate, deviating from the agenda and removing the mayor pro-tem. In Hodge's view, changing the rules is also on that list, an insurmountable task when the council is immovably split 4-3.
Three times a majority of council members have voted to change the rules, and three times Hodge has declared the vote invalid -- illegally, says the lawsuit.
"Basically, we've had enough," says Councilman Patrick Harvey.
Harvey says the council's schism goes back years but that it has intensified under Hodge. He attributes it to a basic misunderstanding of the council-manager form of government.
"Every time [the motion to change the council's rules] comes up, she says 'I require a 2/3 vote,'" he says. "You're in a council-manager form of government, but you have a mayor who's acting like a strong mayor."
Hodge hasn't yet returned a call or emails seeking comment, but it's clear her opponents aren't the only ones who can toss out allegations of rule-breaking. At Tuesday's meeting, the council convened closed hearings to investigate complaints that Harvey and his three allies were violating the city charter.
Send your story tips to the author, Eric Nicholson.
Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.