^
Keep Dallas Observer Free
4
| News |

The Fishes Wear Manolos

In case you missed it, there's been a tempest roiling at Southern Methodist University over the last couple of weeks completely unrelated to nekkid women. Professors from the science departments at SMU tried to shut down a conference beginning tonight at McFarlin Auditorium dubbed Darwin vs. Design, a program produced by the Discovery Institute. Intelligent Design, or the idea that life is too complex and wondrous to spring forth from haphazard unguided processes like natural selection and therefore must be the work some Big Kahuna, is not science,they say. It doesn't offer any testable hypotheses. How do you test for whatever mechanism this intelligence is?

The profs failed to shut it down. Something about free speech. But they did lodge their protests here and here. Lee Cullum was particularly wound up by the event, positing this gem in The Dallas Morning News: "The university does not have a First Amendment obligation to provide a venue to intellectually suspect arguments..." Wow. That's one bizarre statement coming from a respected journalist. Don't students deserve to know exactly why these arguments are suspect -- if, in fact, they are -- and draw their own conclusions? Isn't that what higher education is all about, intellectual rigor? Hmm. Not so much.

Larry Ruben, chair of SMU's biology department, said his beef was with the conference title, which he called dishonest. "It's not debate about the models for evolution versus intelligent design," he told me. "It is a program on intelligent design." So the Discovery Institute invited the science professors to duke it out with them at the conference. They declined.

And those folks folks at the dreaded Discovery Institute? Couldn't be happier. "I think inadvertently it has promoted it," says Stephen Meyer, a former SMU student and a featured speaker at the event. Also appearing is Michael Behe, biochemist from Lehigh University and author of the controversial book Darwin's Black Box. Behe made headlines in late 2005 during court testimony in a lawsuit against Pennsylvania's Dover Area School District, which required the presentation of Intelligent Design theory as an alternative to evolutionary theory. McFarlin should be fun tonight, unless you have other things to do. --Mark Stuertz

I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.

 

Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.