If It Makes You Feel Better, You’re Not the Only One Who Thinks Downtown Parking Sucks

Initially, MIG’s Downtown Dallas 360 plan was due to the city council right about now; but that was before the price tag jumped to more than $700,000 to cover the cost of parking, and now it’s scheduled to be put under City Hall’s Christmas tree, can’t wait. But late yesterday there were some new docs posted to MIG’s site.

We’ll get to the latest to-do list shortly, but first I’ll direct your attention to the Downtown Dallas Parking Strategic Plan Summary of Stakeholder Interviews, conducted with city officials, parking-lot owners and operators, downtown property owners and architects — all of whom repeat the same gripes you’ll get absolutely gratis from anyone who’s ever tried to, ya know, park downtown. Some highlights, or the opposite:

• While there is an overall surplus in parking,
  some of the office towers are failing because
  they do not have enough available parking
  associated with their leasable space.
• On-street parking is not convenient for
  guests and residents because of time
  restrictions during daytime hours.
• The creation of a centralized valet has been
  tried and did not work. To work effectively,
  the system needs to have one uniform
  operator.
• The perception of poor parking conditions
  is making retail less viable in the core — the
  City needs to help retailers understand that
  parking is available.
• The lack of retail is a direct result of the
  overall parking problem. Centralized parking
  to accommodate several different uses
  would be publicly supported. Tenants,
  residents, and downtown visitors have a hard
  time finding available parking. Consistent
  wayfinding may be a solution.
• Charging for parking on weekends is
  counterproductive to attracting retail
  business.

On the colorfully illustrated pages that follow are 25 “examples of successful strategies,” all of which are a bit, ya know, vague at present. (“Truly
integrate parks
and parking” — no, you don’t say. “Create ‘win-win’ solutions
through improved development
agreements and creative financing
strategies” — revolutionary.) But one thing everyone could agree on: “The group cited Fort Worth’s system
as a good example of how things could/should work.” I would have been happy to have provided this information for nothing.