If It Makes You Feel Better, You're Not the Only One Who Thinks Downtown Parking Sucks

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

Initially, MIG's Downtown Dallas 360 plan was due to the city council right about now; but that was before the price tag jumped to more than $700,000 to cover the cost of parking, and now it's scheduled to be put under City Hall's Christmas tree, can't wait. But late yesterday there were some new docs posted to MIG's site.

We'll get to the latest to-do list shortly, but first I'll direct your attention to the Downtown Dallas Parking Strategic Plan Summary of Stakeholder Interviews, conducted with city officials, parking-lot owners and operators, downtown property owners and architects -- all of whom repeat the same gripes you'll get absolutely gratis from anyone who's ever tried to, ya know, park downtown. Some highlights, or the opposite:

  • While there is an overall surplus in parking, some of the office towers are failing because they do not have enough available parking associated with their leasable space.
  • On-street parking is not convenient for guests and residents because of time restrictions during daytime hours.
  • The creation of a centralized valet has been tried and did not work. To work effectively, the system needs to have one uniform operator.
  • The perception of poor parking conditions is making retail less viable in the core -- the City needs to help retailers understand that parking is available.
  • The lack of retail is a direct result of the overall parking problem. Centralized parking to accommodate several different uses would be publicly supported. Tenants, residents, and downtown visitors have a hard time finding available parking. Consistent wayfinding may be a solution.
  • Charging for parking on weekends is counterproductive to attracting retail business.

On the colorfully illustrated pages that follow are 25 "examples of successful strategies," all of which are a bit, ya know, vague at present. ("Truly integrate parks and parking" -- no, you don't say. "Create 'win-win' solutions through improved development agreements and creative financing strategies" -- revolutionary.) But one thing everyone could agree on: "The group cited Fort Worth's system as a good example of how things could/should work." I would have been happy to have provided this information for nothing.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.